Month: July 2019


*including imported goods
This article by Natacha Engel, who was our Fracking Czar until she resigned over the government’s lack of support, lays bare the fallacy that the UK is on target to achieve 100% emission reductions by 2050. What is actually happening is that instead of making stuff ourselves, we are now importing most of it from places like China and India. This means that we are not emitting the CO2 ourselves, but outsourcing them, along with the jobs that go with them. So instead of feeling self-satisfied by the government’s figures that we have cut emissions by 43.5% we ought to be feeling cheated and let down by our governments of all stripes. This is just another example of statistics being simply used to distort the truth.

via climate science

July 1, 2019 at 01:30AM

Renewable Energy vs. Africa’s Renaissance

Thirteen of the world’s 20 least electrified countries are in Africa. Around 630 million people live without access to electricity in sub-Saharan Africa.

“What will help Africa defeat energy poverty: glorified renewables or time-tested, dense, reliable conventional energies?”

The African energy renaissance never happened. Most of the continent is still in the dark and far behind the rest of the world in energy production.

the challenges faced by Africa’s energy sector have only been complicated by European
interests in climate policy-driven renewable energy

What will help Africa defeat energy poverty: glorified renewables or time-tested, dense, reliable conventional energies?

African Energy Situation

Africans are very nearly 1/6th of the world’s people, but they consume just 1/30th of the world’s primary energy. Thirteen of the world’s 20 least electrified countries are in Africa. Around 630 million people live without access to electricity in sub-Saharan Africa.

Among those who do have electricity access,
reliability is a big issue. Fewer than one out of three of sub-Saharan African
hospitals and healthcare facilities have access to reliable electricity, and
over half have no electricity at all.

Around 730 million people in Africa rely on highly polluting biomass for cooking. Wood for fuel and charcoal for cooking together make up most of the primary energy consumed in the continent. Though it’s a renewable resource, most of the world has already moved away from biomass because of its low quality and harms to health.

In South Africa—the most advanced energy state in Africa—electricity production is dominated by coal power. South Africa is the only nation in Africa to produce electricity from nuclear sources, with nearly 14,202 gigawatt-hours of electricity produced in 2013.

As they are for any developed economy in the West, and for other developing economies in the East, fossil fuels are key to Africa’s energy sector. They act as the propellants of the fast economic development necessary to alleviate poverty and meet basic energy demands.

However, there is a very serious threat to Africa’s plans of consolidating and developing fossil fuel resources.

Renewable Inefficiency

The climate-change movement has taken firm control of
the political institutions in Europe, which is a major contributor of capital
for Africa’s development.

As a result, those in authoritative positions in the
European Union, United Nations, and various non-profits are keen on developing
renewable energy resources—especially wind and solar—in Africa, as they believe
it is environment friendly and prevents climate change.

However, the inefficiency of renewable resources in
generating electricity is well documented.

Unlike coal, oil, natural gas, and nuclear, the electricity generated from renewables is intermittent–and unpredictably so. Both wind and solar are weather dependent, and there are frequent short-term (a few hours) and long-term disruptions (12 hours every day for solar, and many months for wind) in electricity generation.

Currently, there are no backup solutions as standby
for this variability in production. The only solution is to support the
renewable grid with conventional energy sources when these renewable sources go
off. But that means paying twice for energy: once for the renewable generators,
which work some of the time, and again for the conventional and nuclear
generators, which work all the time—and paying twice is exactly what Africans,
with their poverty, cannot afford to do.

Geographically too, the feasibility for energy
generation from these sources is very limited. For example, wind potential exists
only in the countries
of Morocco and Egypt, with significantly lower
potential in Tunisia, South Africa, and Tanzania.

Even during their operational hours, peak production
from wind and solar does
not match well
with the peak of demand during busy hours.

And even if they do miraculously manage to produce the
right amount of energy, the cost of production remains very high and will
likely be passed on to the consumers in a continent barely able to afford
electricity. Renewables are also significantly
more expensive
than coal-powered energy.

These are the major reasons why renewable energy has
not taken off.

Contrary to the media reports, the use of renewable
energy has gone down drastically in the past two centuries. In the 19th
century, most of the world’s energy came from human
labor, wood, and domestic animals
. During the latter half of the
20th century, renewable energy provided only around 14
of the total energy.

the worldwide progress in wind and solar technology during the past four
decades, renewables contributed only a minor percentage of world’s total energy

2015, total contribution of renewables (excluding hydroelectric) to global
electricity production was just around 6.7 percent.
Solar energy produced only one percent of all electricity used globally. The
current business-as-usual scenario of the Paris agreement
suggests that only 16.5 percent of energy in 2040 will come from all renewables
(including hydroelectric and biomass).

The Future

There is not a single major economic superpower in the world that became so by depending on renewable energy. Each of the current economic powerhouses was fostered and supported by a vibrant and fast-growing fossil-fuel industry.

Africa’s energy demand is projected to multiply six
times by 2040. The threat from the pro-renewable, anti-fossil fuel entities
could prove to be the biggest hurdle for the development of the continent’s
energy sector—and consequently for its conquest of poverty.

Africa’s future will be determined by its ability to
produce and provide energy to the vast regions, with their hundreds of millions
of people, that remain powerless. Doing so requires bypassing the restrictive
energy policies promoted in the name of climate change. Fossil fuel based
energy is the most affordable and reliable.

Fiona Kobusingye, former chairwoman of the human rights and economic development group CORE Uganda, best conveyed this in her article, “End environmental experiments on Africans!“:

China and India put up with immoral eco-colonialism for decades…..Finally, they had enough. They refused to be the environmentalist’s experimental pawns any longer. They took charge of their own destinies, charted their own future, financed their own projects, and refused to be stopped again by anti-development green policies, politicians, and pressure groups.”

Africa should do the same.


Vijay Jayaraj (M.Sc., Environmental Science, University of East Anglia, England) is Research Associate for Developing Countries for the Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation. He lives lives in Bangalore, India. His previous posts at MasterResource examined China coal policies and India energy needs. (Other Jayaraj posts can be seen here.)

The post Renewable Energy vs. Africa’s Renaissance appeared first on Master Resource.

via Master Resource

July 1, 2019 at 01:20AM