Month: April 2017

Paris Climate Agreement should be exited by U.S.

Paris Climate Agreement should be exited by U.S.

via Climate Change Dispatch
http://ift.tt/2jXMFWN

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt appeared on “Fox & Friends” April 13 and said, “Paris is something we really need to look at closely, because it’s something we need to exit, in my opinion.” Why? “It’s a bad deal for America. China and India had no obligations under the agreement until 2030, we front-loaded […]

via Climate Change Dispatch http://ift.tt/2jXMFWN

April 17, 2017 at 11:43PM

Election 8th June – a Scottish perspective

Election 8th June – a Scottish perspective

via Scottish Sceptic
http://ift.tt/1wv5Sjx

In 2014 the Scottish people voted against leaving the UK and for remaining part of the UK. Last year we in Scotland having committed to take decisions like brexit as part of the UK agreed to leave the EU. As … Continue reading

via Scottish Sceptic http://ift.tt/1wv5Sjx

April 17, 2017 at 10:48PM

Trump Administration May Not Find Middle Ground on Paris Climate Deal

Trump Administration May Not Find Middle Ground on Paris Climate Deal

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

As the Trump administration debates whether to stay in the Paris climate agreement, observers are skeptical that opposing wings of the administration will reach a middle ground.

President Donald Trump’s top advisers are expected to meet Tuesday to discuss whether the U.S. should remain in the agreement, Politico reported. The White House did not confirm on Monday that the meeting would happen.

Trump has been critical of the Paris deal’s potential effect on the U.S. economy, and told Reuters during last year’s presidential campaign that he may “renegotiate” the deal. But it seems unlikely that the debate could lead to a compromise in which the U.S. stays in the Paris agreement while reducing its commitment to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

Michael McKenna, an energy lobbyist who led the Department of Energy’s transition team, said the text of the deal does not allow countries to reduce their commitments, and anything but a full-fledged withdrawal would undermine Trump’s focus on rolling back environmental regulations.

The agreement’s text specifically allows a country to adjust its greenhouse gas targets if it is “enhancing its level of ambition,” but not to reduce promises.

“There’s no way to square this circle,” said McKenna, who supports a full-fledged exit from the Paris agreement. “The president is going to have to decide, you’re in or you’re out.”

Trump’s efforts to roll back other environmental regulations, including the Clean Power Plan and auto-emissions standards, are “window dressing” if the administration maintains its promises under the Paris agreement, McKenna said in a phone interview on Monday.

Full post

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

April 17, 2017 at 08:42PM

Trump Administration Divided Over Obama’s Paris Climate Deal

Trump Administration Divided Over Obama’s Paris Climate Deal

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

President Donald Trump’s key advisers remain divided on the issue of climate change as they prepare to discuss whether the United States should remain a party to the Paris Climate Agreement.

“Senior officials will meet this week to discuss the options, with the goal of providing a recommendation to the President about the path forward,” a senior White House official told CNN.

A State Department official offered: “As with many issues, the administration is reviewing the United States’ international climate change policies. At this point, we do not have any decisions to announce.”

Two distinct camps have formed within the administration along fault lines separating the anti-establishment wing from the more moderate wing of the White House.

On one side are chief strategist Steve Bannon and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt, who want the United States to back away from the agreement. Pruitt told “Fox & Friends” last week: “Paris is something that we really need to look at closely, because it’s something we need to exit in my opinion.”

They’ve found themselves at odds with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who has argued the deal gives the United States an important seat at the table in international negotiations, and that withdrawing now could erode faith in US leadership, particularly with China and key allies in Europe.

During his confirmation hearing, Tillerson said climate change “will require a global response.”

“Countries that attempt to influence this by acting alone are probably only harming themselves,” he added. “I think it’s important that the US maintain a seat at that table so that we can also judge the level of commitment of the other 189 or so countries that are around that table, and again, adjust our own course, accordingly.”

The agreement has 194 countries that are signatories and 143 countries that have ratified the agreement.

The President’s daughter, Ivanka Trump, and her husband, Jared Kushner — both top White House advisers, are also reportedly in favor of the climate accord.

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

April 17, 2017 at 08:20PM