Month: April 2017

Environmentalists Lose Big In Battle To Stop Fracking

Environmentalists Lose Big In Battle To Stop Fracking

via Climate Change Dispatch
http://ift.tt/2jXMFWN

Environmentalists lost a major lawsuit against hydraulic fracturing Wednesday, clearing one of the last major roadblocks to fracking in Britain. The Preston New Road Action Group (PNRAG) sued to stop fracking in Lancashire, England. High Court Justice Ian Dove threw out the suit, dealing PNRAG a huge setback. Dove ruled PNRAG’s lawsuit was groundless, and […]

via Climate Change Dispatch http://ift.tt/2jXMFWN

April 12, 2017 at 05:31AM

For U.S. Shale, Another Boom On The Horizon

For U.S. Shale, Another Boom On The Horizon

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

If oil prices hold above $50 a barrel, the fledging comeback in U.S. drilling could crescendo into another oil boom over the next two years.

In a report Tuesday, the Energy Information Administration said it believes a second burst of shale drilling could bring U.S. oil production close to an all-time record by the end of 2018. That analysis, if correct, would mark a swift turnaround for an industry devastated by low oil prices in recent years, and challenge OPEC’s efforts to rein in the global oil glut.

“OPEC knew the likelihood of U.S. shale picking up, but what they didn’t know – and what none of us know – is how strong it will come back,” said Neil Atkinson, head of the oil markets division of the International Energy Agency.

The EIA projected the nation’s output could vault above 10 million barrels a day by the fourth quarter next year, an increase of 1.2 million from current levels. A surge of that size would put U.S. oil production within 30,000 barrels a day of the nation’s record, set in November 1970.

One big reason the EIA expects output to climb is that companies are shelling out more money to pump oil. Forty-four U.S. oil producers hiked spending in the fourth quarter by a combined 72 percent, or nearly $5 billion, compared with the same period the year before.

Another reason is that shale drillers have likely already seen the worst of the sharp oil production declines that come with drilling wells into dense, stubborn shale rock.

Full story

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

April 12, 2017 at 05:21AM

Paris Climate Accord Is A Dead Deal Walking As $100 Billion Climate Fund Disappears

Paris Climate Accord Is A Dead Deal Walking As $100 Billion Climate Fund Disappears

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

By Paul Homewood

 

image

http://ift.tt/2ooSa4Q

 

From The American Interest:

 

Shocking news—the magic $100 billion climate fund appears not to be taking shape! Even optimistic estimates say the fund is $40 billion short, and developing countries say that understates the problem. The Financial Times:

Climate ministers from Europe, India, Brazil and South Africa have gone to Beijing in recent weeks, hoping to sustain momentum from the Paris talks despite the Trump administration’s dismantling of US regulations meant to limit American emissions.

But discussions have quickly run up against the issue of financing.  “Developed countries have not met their commitments. In their reports a lot of their commitment is in the form of development aid. That doesn’t meet the commitment to contribute to new funds,” China’s top climate change negotiator, Xie Zhenhua, told a briefing on Tuesday. “A lot of countries don’t want to chip in. I said to the European minister: that’s your problem as developed countries. It’s your responsibility to work together and sort it out.”

First world donors have been busily relabeling other foreign aid as contributions to the climate kitty. For developing countries, this is a cheat—they expect $100 billion in new money.

Or, to put it more accurately, they are not nearly stupid and naive enough to believe the lies Western diplomats tell when trying to bamboozle naive green voters at home that they are “Doing Something” about climate change. So they don’t really expect all that money, but hope to use these commitments to pry something out of the West. Also, since the West will certainly default on these bogus commitments, developing countries have all the justification they need to blow off their own commitments when the time comes.

This, one notes, is the house of cards that the last Administration claimed was a big piece of its legacy.

In any case, China, who the clueless Western press has tried to spin as the new hero and leader of the climate movement, is craftily working to widen the north south rift, piously calling on the selfish northern countries to make good on the $100 billion in new money. This failure will, of course, provide China with justification to walk away from any targets it wishes. After all, the West welshed first.

Climate diplomacy has become the leading forum in our time for hypocritical posturing and the politics of pretense. Until the green movement wises up, develops a serious and pragmatic agenda, and pursues a strategically sound political approach, this sorry state of affairs is likely to continue.

http://ift.tt/2ooSa4Q

 

 

Meanwhile, the Financial Times reports that China is busy converting some of their vast coal reserves into oil and gas:

 

coal-conversion

An existing coal conversion plant in Ningdong © Getty

Water-guzzling coal-conversion projects are springing to life in arid western China, setting the stage for the large-scale deployment of what was previously a niche industry.
A three-year downturn in coal prices has revived projects that convert coal to motor fuel, petrochemical feedstock or gas, after many were shelved in 2008 because of concerns about water supply and pollution.
Successful development in China opens the door to the export of coal-intensive technologies, undercutting international efforts to limit emissions of carbon and other greenhouse gases.
Coal conversion is not only highly polluting, it also consumes large amounts of water.  “It’s certainly something China is focusing on,” said Benjamin Sporton, chief executive of the World Coal Association.  “As the energy mix diversifies, coal producers are coming under pressure and they are looking at other ways to use coal.”
Chinese coal-conversion projects have been stop-start for years. They are plagued by technical difficulties, billions of dollars in losses and bureaucratic reversals. New coal conversion targets were set in January after Chinese president Xi Jinping endorsed a mammoth coal-to-oil plant in Ningxia, a desert region with some of the world’s richest coal reserves.  […]
China’s coal giants want to promote coal conversion overseas, especially as part of China’s “Belt and Road” initiative. “We are pushing overseas projects where there are low-cost coal resources,” Mr Zhang said.
Projects that work in China’s state-dominated economy may not be practical elsewhere. Coal conversion has become profitable in China because of an unusual combination of low coal prices relative to state-set gas or petrol prices.
Coal-to-liquids projects normally make economic sense only when oil prices are high or supply is limited. The technology was first developed in Nazi Germany, and commercialised in apartheid-era South Africa.
Natural gas prices are set relatively high in China to justify pipelines running thousands of miles from central Asia to population centres in the east. That gives an opening to gas derived from coal, which is projected to supply 12 per cent of China’s gas consumption by 2020. The switch to gas forms part of Beijing’s Paris agreement pledge for emissions to peak around 2030.

http://ift.tt/2p6hJdP

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

April 12, 2017 at 04:30AM

Environmentalists Lose Big In Battle To Stop Fracking

Environmentalists Lose Big In Battle To Stop Fracking

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

Environmentalists lost a major lawsuit against hydraulic fracturing Wednesday, clearing one of the last major roadblocks to fracking in Britain.

Fracking-green

The Preston New Road Action Group (PNRAG) sued to stop fracking in Lancashire, England. High Court Justice Ian Dove threw out the suit, dealing PNRAG a huge setback.

Dove ruled PNRAG’s lawsuit was groundless, and “not made out in substance.”

“Today’s decision also sets a terrible precedent for other communities facing the unconventional gas industry,” PNRAG said in a statement. “The fracking industry does not constitute as sustainable development and is a backwards step for the UK’s commitment to mitigating climate change and upholding the Paris Agreement.”

U.K.-based energy company Cuadrilla began assembling the first large-scale fracking site in Lancashire in January. British officials approved the operation in October, and Cuadrilla expects to begin drilling in the second quarter of 2017.

“We always remained confident that [sic] that the planning consent would stand, particularly after such a lengthy and thorough review of the application and positive recommendations for approval by both the professional Planning Officers at Lancashire County Council and subsequently an experienced Planning Inspector,” Francis Egan, CEO of the Cuadrilla, said in a statement.

“Work continues on the construction of the exploration site and we look forwards to progressing to the drilling stage of our operations within the next couple of months,” Egan said.

The U.K. is one of the few countries in Europe to allow fracking, but local governments had repeatedly refused to give energy companies permits for years. The central government approved fracking in Lancashire over local objections and issued the first fracking permits in Western Europe since 2011.

“We have been through an exhaustive environmental impact assessment on this,” Egan told BBC News. “We have assessed everything: noise, traffic, water, emissions, etc. The Environment Agency are entirely comfortable with it.”

That hasn’t quelled environmental activists. Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth gathered more than 186,000 signatures to petition the government to ban fracking.

PNRAG and other groups claim fracking has caused earthquakes and groundwater contamination. The British Geological Survey have investigated environmentalist claims about fracking since May and found no evidence to substantiate them.

Full post

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

April 12, 2017 at 04:23AM