Month: April 2017

The WMO’s Dubious Omissions…Arctic Of The 1930s And 1940s Just As Warm As Today!

The WMO’s Dubious Omissions…Arctic Of The 1930s And 1940s Just As Warm As Today!

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

By Paul Homewood

 

image

http://ift.tt/2oMArE7

 

I have long been showing the current relative warmth in the Arctic is not unprecedented, and that conditions were very similar there in the 1930s and 40s. Both events are directly linked to the AMO.

Dr Luning and Prof Vahrenholt have now written on the subject, as Pierre Gosselin reports:

 

 

Climate alarm at the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) was reported on 21 March 2017 at the German online derwesten.de:

Heat waves in the Arctic – climate scientists sound the alarm
[…] During the winter in the Arctic temperatures reached near the melting point. It wasn’t the only weather extreme that climate scientists reported on. Such a heat wave occurred in the Arctic at least three times at the start of 2017, so reported the World Weather Organisation (WMO) in Geneva. Mighty Atlantic currents had delivered warm, moist air to the Arctic. At the peak of winter in the period when it should be freezing, temperatures reached near freezing on some days. The polar jet stream – a wind current that circles the planet at high altitudes – thus impacts the global weather.”

Do we really find ourselves on the verge of disaster? Is it getting hotter and hotter in the Arctic?

Let’s look at the HadCRUT4 temperatures in Arctic (Fig. 1). One clearly sees the warming phase of 1990-2005. Before and after that there were a bit wavy temperature plateaus. There hasn’t been any significant warming in the Arctic in 10 years.

Fig. 1: Arctic temperature since 1957. Data: HadCRUT4, Chart: Climate4You.

Now let’s extend the time scale and look back 100 years. What a surprise: In the 1930s and 1940s there were two heat decades in the Arctic which were almost as warm as today (Fig. 2). This is just a small fact that went missing in the WMO press release and in the derwesten.de article.

Fig. 2: Arctic temperature since 1920. Data: HadCRUT4, Chart: Climate4You.

The earlier Arctic heat years are impressive when we look at the temperature plot of the Iceland city of Akureyri (Fig. 3):

Fig. 3: Temperature plot of the Arctic location of Akureyri since 1880. Source: NASA/GISS.

Now what could have caused it to warm up in the 1930s and 1940s? Here it is enough to look back at the 60-year Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO). This is easily done at the NOAA website (Fig. 4).

Figure 4: AMO

The curves at Wikipedia or elsewhere are perhaps more colorful, but they often don’t include the last years. The main drive behind the Arctic warming of the 1990s and 2000s was the simultaneously strong rise in the AMO.

The heat waves reported by the WMO happen to fit very well with the current high plateau of the AMO (Fig. 4). You don’t need to be a fortune teller to realistically estimate what remains ahead: the AMO plateau could continue for a few more years. A continued massive warming is not expected because the AMO peak has already been reached.

Eventually sometime in the coming years the drop in the AMO will begin. And correspondingly so will the Arctic temperatures . A look back at the climate history really pays off.

Winston Churchill long knew:

The further one looks back in the past, the further one sees into the future.

Some day the ladies and gentlemen at the news media will realize this. The art of fact-checking seems to have been left on the wayside since the invention of the copy-and-paste function.

http://ift.tt/2o60uYA

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

April 5, 2017 at 11:00PM

China’s Hunger For Cars

China’s Hunger For Cars

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

By Paul Homewood

 

 

Statista is a statistics portal, which comes up with all sorts of weird and wonderful stats.

Today, they have got this one:

 

chartoftheday_8842_sales_of_passenger_cars_in_selected_countries_worldwide_n

http://ift.tt/2nNtfH2

 

With a population of 1.386bn, car sales in China work out at one for every 57 people.

This is not far away from the US ratio of 1 per 47.

 

It’s one more indication that energy use is going to continue to rise rapidly in China.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

April 5, 2017 at 09:30PM

NuGen nuclear project facing uncertainty as Engie exits

NuGen nuclear project facing uncertainty as Engie exits

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

By Paul Homewood

 

image

http://ift.tt/2nIG5Xb

 

The plot thickens. From PEI:

 

Toshiba has announced it will buy out partner Engie’s  40 per cent stake in the operator of the proposed NuGen nuclear power project at Moorside in the UK for $138m after Engie asked for the step under the terms of their contract.
The purchase means that for now,
Toshiba will be more deeply involved in a business it is hoping to exit-nuclear power projects outside Japan.
Last week, Toshiba’s US nuclear unit, Westinghouse Electric Co., filed for
bankruptcy protection following huge cost overruns at various nuclear-reactor projects.

Toshiba said the Westinghouse bankruptcy triggered a clause in its contract with France-based Engie that gave Engie the right to sell its stake in the companies’ UK joint venture, NuGeneration Ltd. or NuGen. Toshiba already owns 60 per cent of NuGen.
NuGen has been trying to build three reactors using Westinghouse’s AP1000 model in West Cumbria, in northwest England. On March 30, NuGen said U.K. nuclear regulators approved the AP1000 design.

However, it is unclear whether the reactors will be built. Toshiba said that although it has to take full ownership of NuGen, it ultimately wants to sell the company. Toshiba’s chief executive has made clear that it wants to withdraw fully from the nuclear power plant business overseas to wall off the risk of further losses.

http://ift.tt/2nIG5Xb

 

Engie are no doubt delighted to be able to trigger this clause. It is one more indication that Moorside is a dead duck.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

April 5, 2017 at 09:30PM

The Deepening Crisis of Post-Modern Science

The Deepening Crisis of Post-Modern Science

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

‘That we now live in the grip of post-factualism would seem naturally repellent to most physicists. But in championing theory without demanding empirical evidence, we’re guilty of ignoring the facts ourselves.’

Two excellent articles about science, facts, and post-factualism.

Sabine Hossenfelder just published a superb essay in Nature Physics, entitled Science needs reason to be trusted.  Subtitle: That we now live in the grip of post-factualism would seem naturally repellent to most physicists. But in championing theory without demanding empirical evidence, we’re guilty of ignoring the facts ourselves.

Most unfortunately, this essay is behind paywall. [read here via readcube]. Here are some excerpts:

I’m afraid the public has good reasons to mistrust scientists and — sad but true — I myself find it increasingly hard to trust them too.

The reproducibility crisis is a problem, but at least it’s a problem that has been recognized and is being addressed. From where I sit, however, in a research area that can be roughly summarized as the foundations of physics, I have a front-row seat to a much bigger problem.

But we have a crisis of an entirely different sort: we produce a huge amount of new theories and yet none of them is ever empirically confirmed. Let’s call it the overproduction crisis. We use the approved methods of our field, see they don’t work, but don’t draw consequences. Like a fly hitting the window pane, we repeat ourselves over and over again, expecting different results. But my issue isn’t the snail’s pace of progress per se, it’s that the current practices in theory development signal a failure of the scientific method.

In particle physics, jumping on a hot topic in the hope of collecting citations is so common it even has a name: ‘ambulance chasing’, referring to the practice of lawyers following ambulances in the hope of finding new clients. What worries me is that this flood of papers is a stunning demonstration for how useless the current quality criteria are. 

Current observational data can’t distinguish the different models. And even if new data comes in, there will still be infinitely many models left to write papers about. The likelihood that any of these models describes reality is vanishingly small — it’s roulette on an infinitely large table. But according to current quality criteria, that’s first-rate science.  The accepted practice is instead to adjust the model so that it continues to agree with the lack of empirical support.

But in the absence of good quality measures, the ideas that catch on are the most fruitful ones, even though there is no evidence that a theory’s fruitfulness correlates with its correctness.

The underlying problem is that science, like any other collective human activity, is subject to social dynamics. Unlike most other collective human activities, however, scientists should acknowledge threats to their objective judgment and find ways to avoid them. But this doesn’t happen.

If scientists are selectively exposed to information from likeminded peers, if they are punished for not attracting enough attention, if they face hurdles to leave a research area when its promise declines, they can’t be counted on to be objective. That’s the situation we’re in today — and we have accepted it.

Full post

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

April 5, 2017 at 09:27PM