Month: May 2017

OPEC Still Fundamentally Misunderstands The U.S. Shale Revolution

OPEC Still Fundamentally Misunderstands The U.S. Shale Revolution

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

What the Saudi market share strategy failed to understand was the rapid innovation by the U.S. shale industry.  They did not anticipate that service companies and shale producers would be able to dramatically lower costs and increase recoveries over the past three years through the development of new technologies.

A new report from OPEC estimates that crude oil production from non-OPEC nations will increase by 950,000 barrels per day during 2017.  This is a dramatic increase from last month’s estimate of a non-OPEC rise of 580,000 during the year.

This new, much higher estimate has raised concerns within the OPEC cartel that its efforts to balance the global supply/demand equation will require it to either extend its current production limitations into 2018, or to agree to even deeper cuts in its member countries’ own production levels.  Based on these concerns, the new report urges all non-OPEC nations to limit their own production:

A large part of the excess supply overhang contained in floating storage has been reduced and the improvement in the world economy should help support oil demand. However, continued rebalancing in the oil market by year-end will require the collective efforts of all oil producers to increase market stability, not only for the benefit of the individual countries, but also for the general prosperity of the world economy.

The report singles out U.S. shale producers as the main culprit for the lingering over-supply situation.  This is not surprising, given that overall U.S. oil production has risen by a whopping 800,000 bopd since last October, as U.S. producers have activated more than 250 new drilling rigs and implemented higher drilling budgets for 2017.

This expectation that U.S. producers are somehow going to join together with the national oil companies and controlled markets of OPEC, Russia and other countries to intentionally limit production betrays the same fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of the U.S. oil and gas industry that created the global supply glut  and resulting price collapse in the first place.

To review, back in 2014, Saudi Arabia, concerned about the loss of market share it had absorbed as the U.S. shale revolution almost doubled U.S. overall production from 2009 through early 2014, embarked on a strategy in which it would intentionally crash the global crude price by dramatically increasing its own production and exports.  The thought at that time was that, by crashing the price of oil, drilling in the U.S. would collapse, and producers who were focused on drilling these capital-intensive horizontal shale wells would by and large go out of business.  Even better, because the 2014 break-even price of the average U.S. shale well was in the range of $70/bbl, the U.S. industry would remain depressed so long as the price remained below that level.

This strategy had the shortcoming of only being half-right.  Drilling in the U.S. did indeed collapse, as the oil rig count dropped like a stone, from more than 1,600 to fewer than 400 in very short order.  While few companies ultimately went out of business, well more than 200 U.S. upstream companies have gone through the bankruptcy process, with the assets of some being absorbed by other producers.  So that part was right to a large extent.

But what the Saudi market share strategy failed to understand was the impressive nimbleness and aptitude for rapid innovation possessed by the U.S. oil and gas industry.  They did not anticipate that service companies and shale producers would be able to so dramatically lower costs and increase recoveries over the past three years through the development of new technologies, the strategic capture of economies of scale, and refinement of internal processes.

Because of that, they also did not anticipate that the break-even cost associated with drilling shale wells in the U.S. would fall to as low as $40/bbl in the Permian Basin, and into the $50/bbl range in some other major shale basins.  Saudi Arabia and the other OPEC countries more recently also failed to understand the urgent need for U.S. producers to drill wells in order to remain going concerns.  They apparently had never heard the old oil industry saying that “if you aren’t increasing your production, you’re going out of business.”  This saying may be old, but it remains as true in the U.S. today as it was a century ago.

Full post

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

May 12, 2017 at 03:29AM

Glacial Lake Missoula Flood – Dry Falls – Video

Glacial Lake Missoula Flood – Dry Falls – Video

via Ice Age Now
http://ift.tt/2qcAwB3


A fascinating “Nick on the Rocks” video about Dry Falls in Washington state.



Nick describes it as “An ice-age flood, with water rocks, mud and icebergs 3½ miles wide on a thundering journey to the Pacific Ocean.”

The flood raced down the Columbia River with 10 times the power of all the world’s rivers combined.

Note:
I discuss this flood in detail in “Not by Fire but by Ice,” (Chapter 15, “Noah’s Deluge”).

I’ve made it a point to visit many of the viewing locations including Dry Falls, the Wallula Gap, and the Clark Fork River. That’s where a tongue of ice, the Purcell Lobe, moved south from Canada and dammed up the river to create Glacial Lake Missoula.

Glacial Lake Missoula was bigger than all five Great Lakes put together. When the ice dam broke, the ensuing flood, also known as the great scablands flood, created Dry Falls. 

When you view the video, even when you visit the area in person, it is almost impossible to understand the vast scale of what you’re seeing. This photo showing the visitor center in relation to the size of the falls helps a little.



Nick Zentner is the science outreach and education coordinator for the Department of Geological Sciences at Central Washington University. He has produced more than 40 short videos about Central Washington geology.

Note:
I’ll be posting more fascinating episodes of “Nick on the Rocks” in the days to come.


The post Glacial Lake Missoula Flood – Dry Falls – Video appeared first on Ice Age Now.

via Ice Age Now http://ift.tt/2qcAwB3

May 11, 2017 at 09:15PM

In Norway it should be sunny, instead it is snowing

In Norway it should be sunny, instead it is snowing

via Ice Age Now
http://ift.tt/2qcAwB3

“At least I do not have to worry about the neighbors
noisy barbeque parties.”

Hello Robert.

I am writing to you
from Norway. we are in the spring
month of may. By this of the year it
is usually warm and summer like
conditions.

And it has been snowing outside this
night.

I have a strange feeling that the
spring may be delayed or we see the sign
of a new ice age.

I am also beginning to wonder about
this so called global warming….

Something does not feel right. At least i
do not have to worry about the neighbors
noisy barbeque parties.

Carl Frederik (Norway)

The post In Norway it should be sunny, instead it is snowing appeared first on Ice Age Now.

via Ice Age Now http://ift.tt/2qcAwB3

May 12, 2017 at 03:17AM

Finland Is Worried That It Is As Warm As 1939!

Finland Is Worried That It Is As Warm As 1939!

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

By Paul Homewood

 

h/t Patsy Lacey

 

From the Guardian, via Yahoo:

 

image

Finland, the new chair of the Arctic council, has appealed to climate change scientists to fight the threat of the US and Russia tearing up commitments to combat global warming.

The Nordic country takes up the two-year chairmanship of the body, increasingly a forum where arguments about climate change play out, at a ministerial meeting on Thursday in Fairbanks, Alaska, where the US secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, will represent the Trump administration.

The meeting is due to set targets to reduce black carbon in the Arctic, a pollutant that traps atmospheric heat, but comes amid fears the US is poised to downgrade its commitments made at the 2015 Paris conference on climate change.

Harri Mäki-Reinikka, the Finnish ambassador for northern policies, called for the Paris treaty to be respected.

“We hope there will be no deals over the heads of others – these are very global issues. Arctic conditions are changing. If the temperatures are two degrees higher globally that can be four degrees higher, or even six degrees in the Arctic,” he said.

“What is even more worrying is that ice and snow are melting faster than we estimated, and that will change the composition of the waters and even the sea level might be rising. If we have two countries, Russia and the US, not sharing the view that climate change is happening or is manmade or how much it is manmade, it is very difficult to proceed.”

Mäki-Reinikka said “a month ago Putin said climate change is not man made” but recent reports of bubbles of methane gas forming in Siberia, potentially putting more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, could mean “a vicious circle of climate change and global warming will be faster, and the Paris climate change agreements will need to be stronger”.

http://ift.tt/2q9vxV5

 

Finland only has one long running GHCN station in the Arctic Circle, the small town of Sodankyla.

As we keep on finding around the Arctic, temperatures there were just as high in the 1930s as they are now.

 

station

http://ift.tt/2r8iIY6

 

As for sea levels, they are actually falling in that part of the world:

 

index

http://ift.tt/2r8fOmi

 

 

As with all such bodies, the Arctic Council is no more than an excuse for bureaucrats and junk scientists to enjoy well paid jobs that enable them to pretend they are doing something important, instead of having to work for a living.

 

 

PS Maybe I’m being a bit thick, but can anybody explain to me how black carbon can “trap atmospheric heat”?

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

May 12, 2017 at 03:09AM