Uh, oh. Science Journal Nature editorial on #ParisAgreement: “Better out than in”

Uh, oh. Science Journal Nature editorial on #ParisAgreement: “Better out than in”

via Watts Up With That?
http://ift.tt/1Viafi3

From nature.com and the “that’s going to leave a mark” department:

By Luke Kemp

Continued US membership in the Paris Agreement on climate would be symbolic and have no effect on

US emissions. Instead, it would reveal the weaknesses of the agreement, prevent new opportunities from

emerging, and gift greater leverage to a recalcitrant administration.

After the election of President Trumand a two-house Republican majoritymany fear for the future of US climate policy. The new administration has indicated that they will abolish Obamas climate legacthrough executive orders.

The repeal of domestic measures will likely result in the US missing its first nationally determined contribution (NDC) under the Paris

Agreement, which is an inadequate target of reducing emissions by 26–28% compared to 2005 levels by 2025. If other countries

adopted comparable targets, global warming would likely exceed 2°C (ref. 2). The US would need to implement the Clean Power

Plan and additional measures to reach its NDC.

Preliminary research suggests thathe policies of the Trump administration would instead lead to emissions increasinthrough to 2025.

Now the predominant concern fomuch of the international community is that the US will withdraw either from the Paris Agreement, or the overarching United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The former would take four years and the latter only one. Both arlegally possible and within the presidential mandate.

The conventional wisdom is thaa US withdrawal would be a worst-case scenario for international climate policy.

However, a sober analysis of the political, legal, and financial impacts suggests otherwise. The modified matrix of risks posed by a recalcitrant US administration summarized in Table1, and explored in detail below, highlights the paradox oUS participation: a rogue US can cause

more damage inside rather than outside of the agreement.

via Watts Up With That? http://ift.tt/1Viafi3

June 1, 2017 at 09:02AM

Leave a comment