Category: Uncategorized

New Power Capacity For Iran & Pakistan

New Power Capacity For Iran & Pakistan

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

By Paul Homewood

 

 

Two reports from PEI this week in juxtaposition:

 

 

image

Iran’s installed renewable power capacity is set to reach 700-850 MW within the country’s calendar year (which began on 21 March), the energy ministry announced this week.

The increase would more than double Iran’s current installed renewable capacity, which deputy energy minister Seyed Mohammad Sadeqzadeh put last month at around 340 MW.  

According to the Mehr news agency, Sadeqzadeh said this week that the bulk of the expected capacity would come from wind and solar photovoltaic (PV) farms, which are set to provide 90 per cent of the total amount to be installed.

The new plants will be between 10 MW and 30 MW and will be built across the country, Sadeqzadeh said. Five waste-to-power plants are also under construction, for a total capacity of 9 MW.

http://ift.tt/2ocdNES

 

 

 

 

image

A ground-breaking ceremony took place on Wednesday at will be a 1,320 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant in the Hub district of Pakistan’s Balochistan province.

The plant has a capacity of providing electricity to about four million families after its completion in 2019, state-run Xinhua news agency reported.
It is the second major project after Gwadar port in the restive province under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). The project, which is one of the "priority projects" under the CPEC, is being constructed by the China Power International Holding Ltd and Hub Power Company Limited
Chinese state-run Xinhua news agency reported that the plant will have a capacity to provide electricity to about four million families after its completion in 2019. China has committed to building a number of energy projects in Pakistan to ease power crisis.

http://ift.tt/2nHtLsN

 

 

Iran

Iran are planning to add about 400MW of renewable capacity this year, doubling the current level.

Although this sounds impressive, it is actually distinctly less so, as such claims usually are.

If we assume a generous utilisation of 20% for the mix of wind and solar, this would generate 700GWh annually.

Iran’s total electricity output in 2015 was 281.9TWh, so the new renewable capacity will add just 0.2%.

 

 

 

Pakistan

In contrast, the new coal power plant in Pakistan would be capable of producing 9.25TWh a year, assuming 80% utilisation.

This will amount to 8% of Pakistan’s total generation.

They must be glad China is so keen on building some proper power plants for them, and not making them do with airy fairy wind and solar power.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

March 27, 2017 at 11:00PM

Understanding Global temperatures X – 1970s Global cooling and 2000s Pause

Understanding Global temperatures X – 1970s Global cooling and 2000s Pause

via Scottish Sceptic
http://ift.tt/1wv5Sjx

In previous articles I explained how the 1970-2000 warming was very likely caused by pollution reduction measures: Understanding Global Temperature VIII – It was the greens wot warmed us!! Understanding Global Temperature ix the role ofCO2 Today prompted by some … Continue reading →

via Scottish Sceptic http://ift.tt/1wv5Sjx

March 27, 2017 at 10:56PM

Swiss National Science Foundation: ‘Weaker Sun Could Reduce Global Temperatures By Half A Degree’

Swiss National Science Foundation: ‘Weaker Sun Could Reduce Global Temperatures By Half A Degree’

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

For the first time, model calculations show a plausible way that fluctuations in solar activity could have a tangible impact on the climate. Studies funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation expect human-induced global warming to tail off slightly over the next few decades. A weaker sun could reduce temperatures by half a degree.

medienmitteilung-einfluss-der-sonne-auf-den-klimawandel_560x260

There is human-induced climate change, and there are natural climate fluctuations. One important factor in the unchanging rise and fall of the Earth’s temperature and its different cycles is the sun. As its activity varies, so does the intensity of the sunlight that reaches us. One of the key questions facing climate researchers is whether these fluctuations have any effect at all on the Earth’s climate. IPCC reports assume that recent solar activity is insignificant for climate change, and that the same will apply to activity in the near future.

Researchers from the Physical Meteorological Observatory Davos (PMOD), the Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (EAWAG), ETH Zurich and the University of Bern are now qualifying this assumption. Their elaborate model calculations are supplying a robust estimate of the contribution that the sun is expected to make to temperature change in the next 100 years. For the first time, a significant effect is apparent. They expect the Earth’s temperature to fall by half a degree when solar activity reaches its next minimum.

According to project head Werner Schmutz, who is also Director of PMOD, this reduction in temperature is significant, even though it will do little to compensate for human-induced climate change. “We could win valuable time if solar activity declines and slows the pace of global warming a little. That might help us to deal with the consequences of climate change.” But this will be no more than borrowed time, warns Schmutz, since the next minimum will inevitably be followed by a maximum.

Strong fluctuations could explain past climate

At the end of March, the researchers working on the project will meet in Davos for a conference to discuss the final results. The project brought together various research institutions’ capabilities in terms of climate effect modelling. PMOD calculated what is known as “radiative forcing” taking account of particle as well as electromagnetic radiation, ETH Zurich worked out its further effects in the Earth’s atmosphere and the University of Bern investigated the interactions between the atmosphere and oceans.

The Swiss researchers assumed a greater fluctuation in the radiation striking the Earth than previous models had done. Schmutz is convinced that “this is the only way that we can understand the natural fluctuations in our climate over the last few millennia.” He says that other hypotheses, such as the effect of major volcanic eruptions, are less conclusive.

Exactly how the sun will behave over the next few years remains a matter of speculation, however, since appropriate data series have only been available for a few decades and they reveal no evidence of fluctuations during this time. “To that extent, our latest results are still a hypothesis,” says Schmutz, “and it remains difficult for solar physicists to predict the next cycle.” But since we have been observing a consistently strong phase since 1950, it is highly likely that we will experience another low point in 50 to 100 years’ time. It could be every bit as intense as the Maunder Minimum, which brought particularly cold weather during the 17th century.

Important historical data

The research project also placed great importance on the historical perspective. The Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of Bern compared data series on past solar activity with other specific climatic conditions. People have been recording the number of sunspots, which correlates well with solar activity levels, for some three centuries now. However, it is much more difficult to quantify exactly how cold it was on Earth back then. “We know that the winters during the last minimum were very cold, at least in northern Europe,” says Schmutz. The researchers still have a fair amount of work to do before they have a detailed understanding of the relationship between solar activity and the global climate both in the past and in the future.

Full story

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

March 27, 2017 at 10:21PM

GWPF Calls On Government To Come Clean On Cost Of Renewable Energy

GWPF Calls On Government To Come Clean On Cost Of Renewable Energy

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

By Paul Homewood

 

image

http://ift.tt/2nnxUAh

 

The GWPF have issued this press release:

 

 

The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) is calling on the Government to release the uncensored report on the total system costs of renewable energy which was published last Friday in a version that deleted all quantitive cost estimates.
After an unexplained delay of a year since completion the UK’s Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) last Friday published a report by Frontier Economics on the total system costs of uncontrollably variable renewable generators, a topic of crucial importance in understanding the cost-effectiveness of current climate policies.
The study is not only very late, but contains no quantitative estimates of additional system costs. However, examination of the peer reviews, which are published with the study, reveals that an entire table of numerical cost estimates, some of which were described by the external reviewer as “very high”, were in fact present in the version sent out for comment in mid 2015, but have been subsequently removed.
Remarkably, the document is dated February 2016, and the peer reviews are dated late July to very early September 2015. The Department has been in possession of the final work for over a year before releasing it to the public, and aware of its conclusions for something like a year and a half.
It appears that the consultants, Frontier Economics, are not to blame for this omission, since their draft as sent to the Department of Energy and Climate Change in mid-2015, did in fact include such cost estimates.
Dr John Constable, the GWPF’s energy editor said:
‘Given the sensitive nature of the subject, it is entirely reasonable to suspect deliberate suppression of embarrassing estimates. BEIS should without delay publish the unredacted study so that the interested public can assess the true cost of renewable energy.’
More information about the Frontier Economics report here: 
http://ift.tt/2nnxUAh

 

This is not the first time the government has attempted to cover up the real cost of the climate change act, but this really is a disgraceful one.

Clearly the findings of the report must be extremely embarrassing, otherwise it would have been published straightaway.

In the meantime, expect howls of anguish from the BBC, Committee on Climate Change and Bob Ward that the GWPF is prepared to challenge the climate juggernaut.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

March 27, 2017 at 10:00PM