Category: Uncategorized

Yosemite’s Very Hot Past

Yosemite’s Very Hot Past

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

Yosemite National Park is currently buried in snow, and people are getting lost in the snow.

People are getting lost on Yosemite’s snow-covered trails – SFGate

But Yosemite wasn’t always cold in July. Yosemite rarely reaches 100 degrees anymore, but prior to forty years ago 100 degree days in Yosemite were quite common. During July, 1915 Yosemite was over 100 degrees every day except for one.

July 1915 was much hotter than July 2016 – which the US government says was the hottest year ever. Yosemite is buried in snow now, but on On July 20, 1936 Yosemite reached 115 degrees.

The heat of 1915 at Yosemite was completely unprecedented.

And this was only two years after July 1913, when California reached 134 degrees – hottest temperature ever recorded on Earth. Yosemite was also having a massive heatwave that year.

Climate experts are working hard to erase California’s hot past – because they are not scientists. Rather they are criminals who depend on global warming scam funding for their income.

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

July 9, 2017 at 05:51AM

The real cause of climate change over the last millennium

The real cause of climate change over the last millennium

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop
http://ift.tt/1WIzElD

lgl-steinhilber-tsi-mann08-temp

Fig 1. Integration of solar data departing from long term average as a proxy for OHC

OK, this the last post before I go. This is a comment I made this morning over at Pierre Gosselin’s place (awaiting approval at time of writing this).

To understand the effect of solar variation on a large heat capacity mass like Earth’s oceans, you have to integrate the solar data to get a reasonable proxy for ocean heat content. If you look at empirical comparisons of average sunspot number during periods when the ocean temperature is steady, you can derive a value of approximately 40 sunspots per month. This also happens to be the average sunspot number over the period of record from 1749 to today. Integrating the sunspot numbers as a running total departing from this average produces a reasonable proxy for OHC.

Calibrating the Steinhilber et al TSI reconstruction based on 10Be to the same baseline, we obtain a reconstruction which compares well to the Mann et al 2008 millennial temperature reconstruction, as seen in Fig1.

Adding in the detrended AMO and PDO oceanic oscillations and a CO2 value giving around 0.4C per doubling as per Richard Lindzen’s estimate, we obtain a curve which reproduces HADSSTv3 to an R^2 of 0.9 for monthly values since 1870 in Fig 2.

sst-model

Fig 2. Combining the solar integral with detrended AMO, PDO, and CO2 at 0.4C/doubling to replicate HASsst3 (lower panel)

The continuation of the model in blue in the lower panel is based on our planetary solar model plus a replication of the AMO from the C20th. It shows a moderate drop in global SST to 2050.

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop http://ift.tt/1WIzElD

July 9, 2017 at 03:42AM

Climate Astrology: Climate Scientists Now Predict Wet Future For California

Climate Astrology: Climate Scientists Now Predict Wet Future For California

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

Climate scientists now expect California to experience more rain in the coming decades, contrary to the predictions of previous climate models.

University of California, Riverside, 6 July 2017

“Most previous research emphasized uncertainty with regards to future precipitation levels in California, but the overall thought was California would become drier with continued climate change. We found the opposite, which is quite surprising.” –Robert Allen,  University of California, Riverside

Normalized precipitation over Western North America (five-year mean) from 22 climate models used to formulate the 2013 IPCC report, as summarized by Schwalm et al., 2012, Reduction in carbon uptake during turn of the century drought in western North America.

Image result for Washington Post logo

Most scientists agree that California, like most places, will get warmer through the end of the century. And until now, most agreed California would get drier. New research out of the University of California, Riverside, however, suggests otherwise.

The new models predict the state will enjoy a 12 percent increase in precipitation totals through 2100.

 

Both central and northern California will get wetter, according to the models, while Southern California will experience slightly less precipitation through the end of the century. Most of the increase in precipitation will be during the winter months.

“Most previous research emphasized uncertainty with regards to future precipitation levels in California, but the overall thought was California would become drier with continued climate change,” Robert Allen, an associate professor at UC Riverside, said in a news release. “We found the opposite, which is quite surprising.”

Weather variability makes it difficult to project how climate change will affect rain and snow totals. Predicting future precipitation totals in California is further complicated by the fact that the northern half of the state is expected to get wetter while the southern half is predicted to get drier.

But predictive climate and weather models are growing more sophisticated, allowing scientists to quiet the noise of yearly variability and focus on longterm patterns.

The new research — detailed in the journal Nature Communications — suggest increasing surface temperatures in the tropical eastern Pacific Ocean, lying to the 2,500 miles east, will encourage a local trade wind delivering a larger number of storm systems to the California coast.

“Essentially, this mechanism is similar to what we in California expect during an El Nino year,” Allen said. “Ultimately, what I am arguing is El Nino-like years are going to become more the norm in California.”

In other words, California’s future is likely to look more like the past two years, during which the state enjoyed record rainfall totals.

Full story

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

July 9, 2017 at 03:34AM

Pizzagate true or false? Verdict: likely both a real scandal AND fake news.

Pizzagate true or false? Verdict: likely both a real scandal AND fake news.

via Scottish Sceptic
http://ift.tt/1wv5Sjx

I’ve been hearing about “Pizzagate” for a while. Reading another tweet without hearing any media commentary I decided to try to have a look to find out how convincing, if at all, the “evidence” was. The first thing I notice … Continue reading

via Scottish Sceptic http://ift.tt/1wv5Sjx

July 9, 2017 at 03:17AM