Category: Uncategorized

Hottest Day? At Heathrow, Maybe–But Not In The Rest Of The Country

Hottest Day? At Heathrow, Maybe–But Not In The Rest Of The Country

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

By Paul Homewood

image

http://ift.tt/2rQt7wn

 

It has certainly been uncommonly hot these past few days. Many outlets have talked about a “record breaking” heatwave, such as this report in the Telegraph. This is a grossly misleading claim, because it relates to a record temperature for a single day, in this case June 21st.

There are, of course, thirty days in June, and in a record going back 100 years you would on average see a “record daily temperature” about every three years.

I also noticed last night that the BBC TV weatherman actually put a large newsflash on screen which claimed a temperature of 35C at Heathrow, when the actual temperature was 34.5C. A typically dishonest stunt from the BBC!

But how hot has it really been, in comparison to previous Junes?

 

Eagle eyed readers will already have spotted that the highest temperature was set beside the runway at Heathrow. Coincidence? I think not, as Heathrow was also the scene of the highest temperature on Tuesday as well.

 

ScreenHunter_883 Jun. 21 22.40

 

Even with the help of the tarmac, the Heathrow temperature fell well short of the highest June temperature of 35.6C, which was set in 1957, and equalled in that record breaking summer of 1976:

 

image

 

But to get a better perspective, we need to look at the more representative Central England Temperature series, which provides daily temperatures averaged over a wide area, rather than a collection of individual sites which cannot be compared with each other, and are often biased by artificial local factors.

So far this month (including yesterday), the top three temperatures on CET were 28.2, 28.9 and 29.1C. An analysis of days in June of 28C and over shows that there is nothing at all exceptional about this month’s weather.

 

image

http://ift.tt/1Ag4tlV

 

Many days in the series have been much hotter. Obviously 1976 stands out as the exceptional year, but there other really hot June days prior to then, in years such as 1878, 1941, 1947 and 1950.

Since 1976, there have been no days approaching those sort of temperatures.

This all puts a rather different complexion on claims of “hottest day” and “record breaking” that the BBC and others have been propagating.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

June 22, 2017 at 10:03AM

Why are countries laying claim to the deep-sea floor?

Why are countries laying claim to the deep-sea floor?

via Principia Scientific International
http://ift.tt/1kjWLPW

Around the world, countries are claiming obscure and difficult-to-reach tracts of the deep-sea floor, far from the surface and further still from land. Why? There is a long history of claiming newly discovered territories, of planting the flag at far outposts of the known world. In the early 20th Century, explorers raced to the South […]

Click title above to read the full article

via Principia Scientific International http://ift.tt/1kjWLPW

June 22, 2017 at 09:59AM

We pay a fortune for renewable energy when we should be exploiting fossil fuels

We pay a fortune for renewable energy when we should be exploiting fossil fuels

via Climate Change Dispatch
http://ift.tt/2jXMFWN

Sens. Matt Canavan and Ian Macdonald with ‘Don’t take my coal job and I won’t take your soy latte’ stickers. Sally Rugg via Twitter

QUEENSLAND must set itself up as the “cheap power” capital of Australia to make the most of our abundant resources and kickstart our economy.

Forget “green energy” – until the technology to make it viable is invented – let’s withdraw from the Paris Agreement and let’s throw open the doors to business.

Why should we allow other countries to dictate how we power our industry and economy? Especially when Australia’s CO2 emissions are about 1 percent of the global total?

We should be extracting coal, gas, coal seam gas, oil and uranium and reaping the bounty of cheap energy and lower power bills.

Mines mean jobs, jobs mean taxpayers and consumers, and fossil fuels mean lower bills for everyone.

And our environmental and safety rules mean there are few better places to set up mines.

Cheaper power will attract even more businesses, so that will mean more jobs and greater prosperity.

Petrified politicians kowtow to the UN and to green groups peddling unprovable prophecies of questionable scientific origin.

The result is that our power bills have doubled in the past 10 years and will only continue to go up astronomically under the latest findings by Australia’s chief scientist, Alan Finkel, urging us to rely more on unreliable, intermittent renewable energy.

The Institute of Public Affairs recently reported that Australia’s wholesale electricity price, largely provided by coal was between $30 to $40 per megawatt hour between 2000 and 2006 before rapidly rising to over $100 in 2017 as heavily subsidised solar and wind power started pushing gas and coal out of the market.

While Finkel has now become the new poster boy for the green energy lobby with his statement, he’s also the man who said studies of coal seam gas “fracking” sites worldwide showed no evidence that well-managed fracking contaminated groundwater.

Political commentator Andrew Bolt followed up in 2016: “ … a report for the NSW Chief Scientist reviewed the evidence from 2.5 million fracking wells around the world and failed to identify a single case of one contaminating groundwater.”

The Greens didn’t want to know Finkel’s opinion about fracking back then but now that he has given a nod to global warming and a financially disastrous lurch towards renewable sources, he’s suddenly back in vogue.

No more proof is needed that those who scream loudest about accepting “the science” are only willing to accept the science they agree with.

The area of Queensland is 185 million hectares. Adani’s Carmichael Mine will cover about 28,000 hectares … or 0.015 percent of the state.

The green lobby tries to make us believe this veritable pinprick on the map is going to directly destroy the entire state’s environment, and indirectly that of the whole world.

But you could have 66 Carmichael mines and still only cover less than 1 per cent of Queensland.

We should rake in the billions of dollars on offer to build better roads, improve our schools, pay teachers and nurses more, and eliminate the Queensland Government’s $36 billion in debt.

Unfortunately, too much of the voting public and lazy, scared politicians have succumbed to relentless green brainwashing, and we are paying a high price for that propaganda victory. While wages stagnate, costs of living soar, and now green groups and politicians insist that families pay more for the necessity of electricity.

We’re being sold a lie that renewables are the only way, but Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace, suggests in a recent report that our use of fossil fuels has staved off our extinction from not enough CO2.

Australia’s actions will not impact global temperature one iota, but they will reduce your standard of living if we continue on the renewable path.

One reader suggested dumping all subsidies for power companies and letting the public choose what sort of power to buy. Exposing renewables to the savagery of the open marketplace will cause their instant death, but you can’t blame people for turning to better alternatives.

Even the RACQ this week showed that the costs of running a Tesla electric car are $25,000 a year compared to the cheapest petrol car at $5000.

The numbers just don’t stack up in favour of abandoning coal, oil, and gas, not to mention the grid would destabilise if required to rely too much on renewables, causing blackouts.

The greenies peddle a dream that is, in fact, a nightmare for businesses and working families. The evidence is everywhere, yet our politicians refuse to see it and we pay the cost.

Read more at Cairns Post

via Climate Change Dispatch http://ift.tt/2jXMFWN

June 22, 2017 at 09:56AM

Paris climate signatory offers oil firms record number of Arctic leases

Paris climate signatory offers oil firms record number of Arctic leases

via Climate Change Dispatch
http://ift.tt/2jXMFWN

Norway on Wednesday proposed to open up a record number of blocks in the Barents Sea to oil exploration despite protests from environmentalists and others fearing possible damage to the Arctic region.

The Norwegian oil and energy ministry offered oil companies 93 blocks in the Barents Sea and nine others in the Norwegian Sea, all located beyond the Arctic Circle.

“New exploration acreage promotes long-term activity, value creation and profitable employment in the petroleum industry across the country,” Energy Minister Terje Soviknes, a member of the right-wing government, said in a statement.

Public bodies such as the Norwegian Environment Agency, the Directorate of Fisheries and the Norwegian Polar Institute had opposed the opening of several dozens of these blocks, wary of their proximity to the sea ice and the effect of disruptive surveying techniques on valuable fish stocks, among other things.

“This shows that Norway’s government has no respect for the climate goals they signed onto in the Paris agreement,” the head of Greenpeace Norway, Truls Gulowsen said, referring to the 2015 COP21 accord aiming to keep global warming to under two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) from pre-industrial levels.

Read more at the Daily Times

via Climate Change Dispatch http://ift.tt/2jXMFWN

June 22, 2017 at 09:56AM