Category: Uncategorized

Junk Science Week: Behind the scientific fraud that claims air pollution is killing people

Junk Science Week: Behind the scientific fraud that claims air pollution is killing people

via JunkScience.com
https://junkscience.com

My column for the Financial Post‘s “Junk Science Week.” Junk Science Week: Behind the scientific fraud that claims air pollution is killing people: Studies about people dying from air pollution are all funded by regulation-happy EPA, based on secret data, rubberstamped by EPA grantees By Steve Milloy, June 20, 2017, Financial Post What’s the biggest … Continue reading Junk Science Week: Behind the scientific fraud that claims air pollution is killing people

via JunkScience.com https://junkscience.com

June 21, 2017 at 04:27AM

Australia’s Chief Scientist Explains Why “Climate Policy” Has Nothing To Do With Climate

Australia’s Chief Scientist Explains Why “Climate Policy” Has Nothing To Do With Climate

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

June 21, 2017 at 04:18AM

Why Did CPRE Commission Renewable Lobby Outfit, Regen?

Why Did CPRE Commission Renewable Lobby Outfit, Regen?

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

By Paul Homewood

 

 

image

http://ift.tt/2rPQTbU

I posted on the story of Philip Bratby’s report for the CPRE into renewable energy in the South West.

It was covered by Devonlive.com, who quoted critical comments from an outfit called Regen South West:

Regen South West, an independent not-for-profit organisation set up to promote renewable energy in the region, has hit back at the CPRE report.

Regen chief executive Merlin Hyman has pointed out Mr Bratby’s "views on climate change and renewables are somewhat at odds with those of the scientific community and indeed of CPRE nationally who commissioned Regen to look at how we can meet the Paris Climate Change Agreement whilst minimising landscape impacts".

http://ift.tt/2to6pZR

So who are Regen? The label “not for profit” is often used to persuade people that such organisations are some sort of goody goody outfits, a bit like a charity, and operating in the public interest rather than chasing a profit.

Unfortunately if you believe that, you are probably being conned.

Regen’s website states:

Regen passionately believes that sustainable energy has a vital role at the heart of a successful economy and thriving local communities.

We are an independent not for profit that uses our expertise to work with industry, communities and the public sector to revolutionise the way we generate, supply and use energy.

They clearly have strong beliefs in these matters, and there is no problem with that.

But they obviously don’t work for free, and neither do their suppliers. So who pays the bills?

This is where it starts getting murky!

Regen rely on membership subscriptions, as their website tells us:

 image

http://ift.tt/2rPQTbU

Altogether they earned £1.1m in 2015, according to their latest accounts.

And, naturally, the businesses who were happy to pay these fees were the very same businesses who stand to  make a fortune from renewable subsidies and the whole renewable scam.

In short, Regen, for all of their fancy words and mission statements, are nothing more than a lobby outfit for renewables.

Nothing wrong with that, but perhaps the media, from the lowly of the low, such as Devonlive, to the gullible journalists of the Telegraph, might recognise that, and not continually afford them and their ilk the veneer of authority, with which they would like to clothe themselves.

One might also ask why the CPRE decided to commission Regen in the first place?

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

June 21, 2017 at 03:34AM

Alan Finkel’s Bogus Adventure: Staggering Costs of Clean Energy Target Hidden From View

Alan Finkel’s Bogus Adventure: Staggering Costs of Clean Energy Target Hidden From View

via STOP THESE THINGS
http://ift.tt/1hVO48X

One thing time Finkel will never be accused of is under-selling his 42% renewable energy target, re-boxed and badged as a clean energy target ‘CET’. However, the trouble with hubris is that it does not take very long to prick the over-eager salesman’s balloon. As we pointed out in yesterday’s post, Finkel’s forecast power price … Continue reading Alan Finkel’s Bogus Adventure: Staggering Costs of Clean Energy Target Hidden From View

via STOP THESE THINGS http://ift.tt/1hVO48X

June 21, 2017 at 02:30AM