Category: Uncategorized

Snow in the Rockies, Cascades, and Sierra Nevada – in June!

Snow in the Rockies, Cascades, and Sierra Nevada – in June!

via Watts Up With That?
http://ift.tt/1Viafi3

Snow in the Rockies, Cascades, and Sierra Nevada – in June!

Via weather.com and NOAA:

Several inches of snow are possible in parts of the Cascades and northern Rockies starting this weekend. Snow levels could fall to as low as 5,000 feet by Sunday. Campers in this region should prepare for cold temperatures. Snow is in the forecast starting this second weekend of June in the higher elevations of the mountain West, as an unseasonably cold air mass infiltrates the northwestern United States. The cold air will build in beneath a strong southward dip in the jet stream, or upper-level trough, that will develop this weekend as a result of a weather pattern flip.

National Weather Service Sacramento CA
1039 PM PDT Sat Jun 10 2017

…Late Season Snow Over Northern Sierra and Lassen Park This Weekend…

.A cool weather system will bring late season snow to the mountains of northern California this weekend. Snow levels are expected to drop to near 5000 feet late tonight into Sunday. Although snow levels could be locally lower, the main snow
accumulations are expected above 5500 feet. There could be around 5-10 inches of snow across Lassen Park with 1-4 inches possible over the Sierra. Motorists traveling across the Sierra on Sunday should be prepared for winter driving conditions.


While this is not unprecedented, the last time I can remember having winter weather and snow in the Sierra Nevada was right after Mt. Pinatubo filled the atmosphere with particulates, and caused global cooling.

in Snow, Weather.

via Watts Up With That? http://ift.tt/1Viafi3

June 11, 2017 at 05:23AM

Major breakthrough in solar-planetary theory: Barycentre research vindicated

Major breakthrough in solar-planetary theory: Barycentre research vindicated

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop
http://ift.tt/1WIzElD

As long time regulars at the Talkshop know, our ongoing research into the links between planetary motion and solar variation has occasionally borne fruit in unexpected ways. The ‘shorthand’ for the sum of all planetary vectors is the Sun’s motion with respect to the barycentre of the solar system. This is the path the Sun is forced to follow by the ongoing evolution of the motion of all the planets. We have found various tantalising near-correlations between aspects of this motion and solar activity levels suggestive of some kind of mechanistic linkage.

Last year, we featured a post concerning the work of Shepherd, Zharkov and Zharkova, who have been coming at the solar variation problem from another angle. They resolved the solar-hemispheric components of the solar polar fields into two separate curves, representing shallow and deep solar ‘dynamos’.

ApJ501502_aptepseps.dvi

Combining the curves together produces a good representation of changing solar activity levels. Their prediction is, like ours from our planetary model, for a big solar slowdown extending through the middle decades of this century. The mainstream climate scientists tried to get her press release revoked…

zharkove-apj501502f3_lr

Looking at the red curve in the top panel of the first figure, which becomes the blue curve in Fig 2 of the paper, I decided to compare it with the solar angular momentum around the solar system barycentre. The match is good.

zharkova-solar-am

This plot removes all doubt. The motion of the planets which drives the motion of the Sun around the system barycentre is intimately involved with the evolution of the Solar Dynamo.

I was in contact with Valentina Zharkova last year by email, and she was interested in our research. I’ll send her this latest result.

I can smell revolution in the air.

 

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop http://ift.tt/1WIzElD

June 11, 2017 at 05:09AM

Trump Correct To Reject…Founder Of German Environmental Movement Calls Paris Accord A Bad Deal!

Trump Correct To Reject…Founder Of German Environmental Movement Calls Paris Accord A Bad Deal!

via NoTricksZone
http://notrickszone.com

One of founders of Germany’s modern environmental movement and former renewable energies executive has publicly announced that President Donald Trump’s rejection of the Paris Accord was the right thing to do.

USA starts the PREXIT

At his climate science critical website, Die kalte Sonne, Prof. Fritz Vahrenholt says the USA has de facto “begun the exit out of the Paris Climate Accord“, or PREXIT, and that among world leaders at least Donald Trump comprehends that natural factors are at play.

Moreover Vahrenholt notes that upon really reading the Paris Accord for the first time, it is only now that the media have become surprised that it is not even a binding agreement, and instead one that only involves intentions by the rich countries to transfer cash to developing nations to the tune of $100 billion annually beginning in 2020.

He wonders why “neither Obama nor Merkel, Juncker nor Macron have found it necessary so far to explain to their citizens the agreement burdens their own citizens to the benefit of no. 1 emitters China, and India“.

Vahrenholt calculated the 2030 per capita emissions China allowed by the Paris Accord:

In 2030 Europeans would have to lower their emissions to 4 tonnes per capita, while China’s would be allowed to rise to 14 onnes per capita and the USA would have to fall to 10 tonnes per capita. One has to ask, who signed, cheered and celebrated such an agreement and welcome it with tears of joy?”

Vahrenholt describes an agreement that is totally in favor of China, which plans to construct 368 coal power plants by 2020 and India plans to construct 370. In his view the Paris Accord is a free ride for China. Overall the Paris Accord will hardly have any effect on total emissions.

We can be happy that the American President Trump has seen this anachronism, and what on earth moved his predecessor to such a disadvantageous agreement?”

In Vahrenholt’s view the agreement is neither about the climate nor the environment, and that its real intention was made clear by Prof. Edenhofer of the Potsdam Institute Potsdam:

Through climate policy we will de facto redistribute global wealth… One has to free himself of the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy.”

Also the German professor of chemistry writes that European leaders cannot expect Trump to simply defraud his voters by not keeping his campaign promises, no matter how controversial some may be.

Vahrenholt, a member of the SPD socialist party, says Trump’s decision is nothing to criticize, and those who do criticize “either do not understand the mechanism of Paris, or have an interest to deindustrialize Germany and the bad USA.”

Vahrenholt also questions Germany’s Ministry of Environment (UBA) proposals to tax privately driven kilometers so that German citizens will finally stop driving and ride their bicycles more often, remarking: “There was once such a society: China 25 years ago.”

Overall Vahrenholt sees the Paris Accord as “practically dead” because “Trump’s most important announcement is a stop of all finances to the green climate fund, which as to be supplied with $100 billion beginning in 2020.” The USA’s share is 22%.

Vahrenholt also blasts the IPCC climate conference circuses of Cancun, Bali, Durban, etc..

The USA gave $55 million annually for this travelling climate circus to go to the most exotic locations of the world so that the Schellnhubers and Edenhofers of the globe could act like they are doing important things on the taxpayers’ dime.”

He then cites Prof. Judith Curry. She wrote earlier this year (2017) that the IPCC climate models are not suitable for to explain the causes of the 20th century warming or to forecast regional and global climate changes over decades, let alone a hundred years, and that they are are not adequate for acting as a base for policymaking. Curry adds:

There’s growing evidence that the climate models are running too warm.”

Prof. Vahrenholt concludes his piece by advising EPA chief Scott Pruit to heed Curry’s recommendations.

 

via NoTricksZone http://notrickszone.com

June 11, 2017 at 02:37AM

Climate Feedback Rates Dellers’ Latest Effort – Not the Sceptics’ Messiah, Just a Very Naughty Boy

Climate Feedback Rates Dellers’ Latest Effort – Not the Sceptics’ Messiah, Just a Very Naughty Boy

via Climate Scepticism
https://cliscep.com

    Dellers is on the naughty step again as reported at Climate Feedback Apparently, Five scientists analyzed the article and estimated its overall scientific credibility to be ‘very low’. A majority of reviewers tagged the article as: Cherry-picking, Derogatory, Flawed reasoning, Inaccurate, Misleading. Ooh dear, Delingpole is not the messiah then, he’s just a … Continue reading Climate Feedback Rates Dellers’ Latest Effort – Not the Sceptics’ Messiah, Just a Very Naughty Boy

via Climate Scepticism https://cliscep.com

June 11, 2017 at 02:02AM