Category: Uncategorized

Hating America At The New York Times

Hating America At The New York Times

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

The New York Times is very angry that the US has been so successful, helpful and productive over the past 150 years.

The U.S. Is the Biggest Carbon Polluter in History. It Just Walked Away From the Paris Climate Deal. – The New York Times

Apparently the New York Times prefers the traditional Chinese model of low CO2 emissions, when millions of people starved to death every year for thousands of years.

15 Jun 1931, Page 6 – Montana Butte Standard at Newspapers.com

China’s CO2 emissions are skyrocketing now, people there aren’t starving any more, and US emissions are going down.

But facts don’t matter to the New York Times. It is all about hating America.

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

June 1, 2017 at 04:39PM

Petition to Sack the Defence Imam

Petition to Sack the Defence Imam

via Errors in IPCC climate science
http://ift.tt/1F9oSq3

A tiny little opportunity to make your view count thanks to Bernard Gaynor.

via Errors in IPCC climate science http://ift.tt/1F9oSq3

June 1, 2017 at 02:59PM

Three Cheers for President Trump’s Action Today

Three Cheers for President Trump’s Action Today

via Carlin Economics and Science
http://ift.tt/1gVT2t3

I have to hand it to President Trump. He has now done what he said he would do by removing the US from the Paris climate non-treaty “Treaty.” The climate alarmists have predictably gone bonkers even though there is no objective basis for their concerns. Mr. Trump based his decision on the disproportionate cost of the “Treaty” to the US. He is absolutely right about this, of course. The less developed countries signed onto the “Treaty” on the assumption that Uncle Sugar would pay hundreds of billions to them. And if Mrs. Clinton had been elected, that very likely would have happened despite the US Government’s slipping finances. I see no basis for doing so.

Happily, it turned out that more CO2 molecules in the atmosphere do not make a significant contribution to global warming in the real world. And there is a need for more atmospheric CO2, not less, if plants are to survive future ice ages. And some added warmth would help too, so long as there is no catastrophic global warming. So everyone wins. Plants get more CO2; humans and other animals get to use more plants. Humans get to use fossil fuels to aid them in their work. And as a free bonus for plants, humans emit increased CO2 for their use. What’s not to like? No one planned it that way, but there are no known reasons to abandon the industrial/energy revolution that has had such dramatic effects on the human standard of living and made possible the enormous improvements in the the environment in recent centuries. Limits to Growth stimulated the current climate alarmist movement, but happily it was wrong again.

The Alarmists’ Shrill Complaints Can Be Dismissed

Unfortumately, the climate alarmists got the science backwards, and their shrill complaints can be dismissed as nonsense. President Trump has saved the US and its citizens hundreds of billions if not trillions. And these savings have no adverse effects on anyone other than those hoping for a redistribution of wealth to the less developed world. Hopefully the less developed world will lose interest now that the honey pot has been taken away.

So three cheers for President Obama’s action today on the US involvement (or the lack thereof) in the climate “Treaty.” There remains a need to revoke the EPA Endangerment Finding so that the alarmists cannot easily renew their war on plants if they should come to power again. But the removal of the US from the “Treaty” is a very good start.

via Carlin Economics and Science http://ift.tt/1gVT2t3

June 1, 2017 at 02:21PM

Insane offshore wind farm planned for eastern Victoria

Insane offshore wind farm planned for eastern Victoria

via Errors in IPCC climate science
http://ift.tt/1F9oSq3

Sayeth the ABC our GreenLeft media HQ. Offshore wind farm proposed for waters off Victoria’s Gippsland 2 June 2017
Words fail me that Australia could consider embarking on this hightened level of economic idiocy – at a time when existing renewables are already fueling rocketing electricity prices hastening the destruction of our industries. This proposal is for even more expensive offshore wind. Brilliant chart of “…average commodity price of retail electricity paid by Australian businesses.”

via Errors in IPCC climate science http://ift.tt/1F9oSq3

June 1, 2017 at 01:59PM