Category: Uncategorized

Huge reserves of natural gas under East Texas will fuel the future economy, experts say

Huge reserves of natural gas under East Texas will fuel the future economy, experts say

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop
http://ift.tt/1WIzElD

Credit: tylertexasonline.com

Some experts call it ‘unprecedented’. But as the Tyler Morning Telegraph reports: ‘there’s a caveat. Technically recoverable doesn’t mean profitable – yet.’

As far back as 1911, geologists predicted that significant mineral wealth lay below East Texas, in what was then called the Woodbine Stratum – a formation above the Haynesville Shale.

And Columbus Marion “Dad” Joiner proved them right in 1930, when the Daisy Bradford No. 3 well struck oil just outside Henderson in western Rusk County.

It was really just a drill stem test – they weren’t expecting to hit anything. But at 3,592 feet, Joiner tapped into what was for years thought to be the largest oil and gas reserves in the world. But no-one predicted the vastness of the energy wealth available here.


Last month, the U.S. Geological Survey announced a re-evaluation of the Haynesville and Bossier shale formations. Instead of the previously estimated 61.4 trillion cubic feet of natural gas available (as of 2011), USGS now said there’s 304 trillion cubic feet.

“These estimates, the largest continuous natural gas assessment USGS has yet conducted, include petroleum in both conventional and continuous accumulations, and consist of undiscovered, technically recoverable resources,” the USGS says.

This is big news for East Texas and the nation as a whole.
“The new maps are very impressive,” said Ernest LaFlure, who retired as vice president of EOG Resources’ Tyler division in 2015. “I’d say they’re unprecedented.”

These huge reserves under East Texas, along with two important trends – the export of liquid natural gas and the conversion of the nation’s electrical generation from coal to cleaner and cheaper natural gas – will have a positive long-term effect on the East Texas economy.

Continued here.

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop http://ift.tt/1WIzElD

May 22, 2017 at 06:27AM

NASA’s Josh Willis Destroys Whatever Credibility He Had Left

NASA’s Josh Willis Destroys Whatever Credibility He Had Left

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

By Paul Homewood

 

 

Dave Burton has written a very good retort to a rather ridiculous new video by NASA’s Josh Willis:

 

image

Notice that “catastrophic” is apparently not scary enough, these days. Global warming is now “the Apocalypse.”

The video starts out with two guys crawling along the parched ground under the blazing desert sun. One of them says to the other, “We’re gonna die out here, man. If only society had done more to fight climate change.” And it goes downhill from there.

There’s really nothing new in his video, nor in this article debunking it. So if you’re a “regular” at WUWT, and you’re hoping to learn something new, you needn’t bother reading the rest.

I counted eight claims in Josh Willis’s video. Let’s look at them, one by one:

Claim #1. “Record high global temperatures may have exacerbated our current situation.”

Wrong. “Global warming” mostly just warms higher latitudes. It makes harsh, cold climates milder. The warming effect at low latitudes is slight, and mostly increases nighttime lows, not daytime highs.

If those fellows are dying in the hot desert, they obviously are not at higher latitudes. Where they are, global warming is slight.
In fact, higher CO2 levels make plants more drought-resistant. So, thanks to anthropogenic CO2, deserts and near-deserts are shrinking and greening, most strikingly in the Sahel & Sahara. Even the severely politicized National Geographic admits that it is happening, though they don’t mention CO2:

 

 

 

The full essay is worth reading here.

But Josh Willis has form, which Greg commented over at WUWT:

 

image

 

 

What Greg is referring to is the ARGO data.

NASA take up the story:

 

CORRECTING OCEAN COOLING

On a Thursday evening in February 2007, Josh Willis stood in front of his laptop, his wife cajoling him to get ready to go out to dinner. He looked with a sinking feeling at the map he had just made. Willis, a scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, specializes in making estimates of how much heat the ocean stores from year to year.

Photograph of Josh Willis

Josh Willis is an oceanographer at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory who specializes in sea level trends and the response of the oceans to global warming. (Photograph courtesy Josh Willis.)

“The oceans are absorbing more than 80 percent of the heat from global warming,” he says. “If you aren’t measuring heat content in the upper ocean, you aren’t measuring global warming.”

In 2004, Willis published a time series of ocean heat content showing that the temperature of the upper layers of ocean increased between 1993-2003. In 2006, he co-piloted a follow-up study led by John Lyman at Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory in Seattle that updated the time series for 2003-2005. Surprisingly, the ocean seemed to have cooled.

Not surprisingly, says Willis wryly, that paper got a lot of attention, not all of it the kind a scientist would appreciate. In speaking to reporters and the public, Willis described the results as a “speed bump” on the way to global warming, evidence that even as the climate warmed due to greenhouse gases, it would still have variation. The message didn’t get through to everyone, though. On blogs and radio talk shows, global warming deniers cited the results as proof that global warming wasn’t real and that climate scientists didn’t know what they were doing.

http://ift.tt/2qIc2Tm

 

What follows is a quite shameless account of how the ARGO data was tampered with.

Greg is spot on with his criticism.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

May 22, 2017 at 06:18AM

The Heatwave Of May 22, 1925

The Heatwave Of May 22, 1925

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

On May 22, 1925 the US was experiencing an incredible heatwave, with half of the country over 90 degrees, and 100 degree temperatures in California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, Iowa, Minnesota and Illinois.

Danville, Illinois was 103 degrees on May 22, 1925. Today’s forecast at Danville is 72 degrees, cooling down to 61 degrees on Wednesday. New Ulm and Fairmont, Minnesota were over 100 degrees.

May 22 temperatures in the US have been plummeting over the last 90 years, with the last few years being among the coolest on record. Hot temperatures like May 22, 1925 are incomprehensible now.

This is of course the exact opposite of what we hear from the criminals known as US government climate scientists, whose job is to spread propaganda, not disseminate scientific fact.

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

May 22, 2017 at 05:16AM

Astronomers propose a new type of planetary object

Astronomers propose a new type of planetary object

via Watts Up With That?
http://ift.tt/1Viafi3

From the American Geophysical Union and the “Pluto is still denied planetary status” department comes this idea:

WASHINGTON, DC — Scientists suggest in a new study the existence of a planetary object called a “synestia,” a huge, spinning, donut-shaped mass of hot, vaporized rock, formed as planet-sized objects smash into each other.

The structure of a planet, a planet with a disk and a synestia, all of the same mass.
Credit: Simon Lock and Sarah Stewart.

At one point early in its history, Earth was likely a synestia, said Sarah Stewart, a planetary scientist at the University of California Davis and co-author of the new study in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.

Stewart and Simon Lock, a graduate student at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts and lead author of the new study, explore how planets can form from a series of giant impacts. Current theories of planet formation hold that rocky planets such as Earth, Mars and Venus formed early in the solar system when smaller objects smashed into each other.

These collisions were so violent that the resulting bodies melted and partially vaporized, eventually cooling and solidifying to the nearly spherical planets we know today.

Lock and Stewart are particularly interested in collisions between spinning objects. A rotating object has angular momentum, which must be conserved in a collision. Think of a skater spinning on ice: if she extends her arms, she slows her rate of spin. To spin faster, she holds her arms close by her side, but her angular momentum stays constant.

Now consider two skaters turning on ice: if they catch hold of each other, the angular momentum of each skater adds together so that their total angular momentum stays the same.

In the new study, Lock and Stewart modeled what happens when the “ice skaters” are Earth-sized rocky planets colliding with other large objects with both high energy and high angular momentum.

“We looked at the statistics of giant impacts, and we found that they can form a completely new structure,” Stewart said.

Lock and Stewart found that over a range of high temperatures and high angular momenta, planet-sized bodies could form a new, much larger structure, an indented disk rather like a red blood cell or a donut with the center filled in. The object is mostly vaporized rock, with no solid or liquid surface.

They have dubbed the new object a “synestia,” from “syn-,” “together” and “Estia,” Greek goddess of architecture and structures.

The key to synestia formation is that some of the structure’s material goes into orbit. In a spinning, solid sphere, every point from the core to the surface is rotating at the same rate. But in a giant impact, the material of the planet can become molten or gaseous and expands in volume. If it gets big enough and is moving fast enough, parts of the object pass the velocity needed to keep a satellite in orbit, and that’s when it forms a huge, disc-shaped synestia, according to the new study.

Previous theories had suggested that giant impacts might cause planets to form a disk of solid or molten material surrounding the planet. But for the same mass of planet, a synestia would be much larger than a solid planet with a disk.

Most planets likely experience collisions that could form a synestia at some point during their formation, Stewart said. For an object like Earth, the synestia would not last very long – perhaps a hundred years – before it lost enough heat to condense back into a solid object. But synestia formed from larger or hotter objects such as gas giant planets or stars could potentially last much longer, she said.

The synestia structure also suggests new ways to think about lunar formation. The moon is remarkably like Earth in composition, and most current theories about how the moon formed involve a giant impact that threw material into orbit. But such an impact could have instead formed a synestia from which the Earth and Moon both condensed, Stewart said.

No one has yet observed a synestia directly, but they might be found in other solar systems once astronomers start looking for them alongside rocky planets and gas giants, she said.

###

This research article is open access for 30 days. A PDF copy of the article can be downloaded at the following link: http://ift.tt/2qa9w5y.

via Watts Up With That? http://ift.tt/1Viafi3

May 22, 2017 at 05:09AM