Category: Uncategorized

Scientific Government Advisers Complain About Pre-Election Purdah

Scientific Government Advisers Complain About Pre-Election Purdah

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

Scientists are being gagged from speaking to the public by a heavy-handed government media blackout before the general election, according to leading research institutions.

Civil servants have for more than a century been barred from talking to the press in the six weeks before polling day, a practice known as purdah that is meant to stop new policies or controversies from influencing the outcome.

This year, however, the veil of silence has been cast over independent researchers in what science bodies say is the strictest purdah they can remember. Several senior scientists sitting on government advisory panels have told The Times that the regime meant they could not speak out on issues such as climate change and air pollution. Some said they had been instructed not to speak to journalists, even on non-political matters.

A dozen organisations, including the Royal Institution, the Royal Statistical Society and the British Science Association, have warned that these restrictions risk hampering debate on the important scientific questions of the day.

In a letter to Sir Jeremy Heywood, the cabinet secretary, they have sought clarification about the rules amid fears that the guidance is being applied “in an ad hoc and arbitrary way which is not in the public interest” and is stifling freedom of academic expression.

“We cannot remember an election where purdah extended so far into the daily work of research-active scientists and we are extremely concerned that the public are being denied access to the best experts at the time when they are most needed,” they wrote. “We do not believe, however, that purdah was ever intended to stop research-active scientists from commenting on breaking news or critiquing important new studies.

“These activities are an important part of the scientific process, are not political, and should not be interrupted by an election without good reason.”

Full story

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

May 19, 2017 at 08:20PM

Colder Than Normal Eastern Pacific Ocean Temps Lower El Niño Bias

Colder Than Normal Eastern Pacific Ocean Temps Lower El Niño Bias

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

A number of  forecast models have reduced their El Niño bias for the spring. This is primarily due to colder than normal band of subsurface water in the eastern Pacific Ocean remaining a similar size or even growing in recent months, contrary to the normal El Niño trend.

source: Australian Bureau of Meteorology

El Niño refers to the extensive warming of the central and eastern tropical Pacific that leads to a major shift in weather patterns across the Pacific. El Niño events are often accompanied by cooler than normal sea surface temperatures (SSTs) in the western Pacific, and to the north of Australia.

Typically, the equatorial trade winds blow from east to west across the Pacific Ocean.

During the El Niño climate phenomenon the prevailing trade winds tend to weaken, or even reverse direction. These changes set up a feedback loop between the atmosphere and the ocean that boosts El Niño conditions.

In Australia, El Niño conditions are generally, but not necessarily, associated with below average rainfall, particularly over the eastern states.

Since 1900 there have been 27 recorded El Niño events. Two thirds of these have resulted in significant moisture stress across some or all of the winter cropping regions of the continent.

In the latest update from the Bureau of Meteorology (BoM), the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) for the tropical Pacific region is in neutral territory.

However, there has been a warming trend across the tropical Pacific Ocean since the start of 2017 and they are saying that there is still a 50 per cent chance that El Niño will develop in the second half of this year.

Another key indicator is the Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD). The IOD is the difference in sea surface temperature between two areas (or poles, hence a dipole) – a western pole in the Arabian Sea (western Indian Ocean) and an eastern pole in the eastern Indian Ocean, south of Indonesia.

Four out of six climate models currently suggest a positive IOD is likely to develop during the southern hemisphere winter. In years when a positive IOD coincides with El Niño the pattern of below average rainfall extends further west than it typically would under El Niño alone.

In recent weeks a number of the long range forecast models have reduced their El Niño bias for the spring. This is primarily due to colder than normal band of subsurface water in the eastern Pacific Ocean remaining a similar size or even growing in recent months, contrary to the normal El Niño trend.

In April the US model was forecasting a steady increase in the development of El Niño throughout the southern hemisphere spring. By early May their confidence in this forecast had actually reduced, with the mean prediction now below El Niño levels throughout our spring.

Full story

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

May 19, 2017 at 07:52PM

Industrial Scale Battery Storage of Wind & Solar Would Cause Surge in CO2 Emissions

Industrial Scale Battery Storage of Wind & Solar Would Cause Surge in CO2 Emissions

via STOP THESE THINGS
http://ift.tt/2kE7k62

Californian carpet-bagger, Elon Musk has been threatening South Australia with a plan to scoop up at least $150 million of the $550 million its hapless Labor government is about to squander on non-fixes for its self-inflicted wind power disaster. So no time like the present to reflect on just how ‘green’ is SA’s plan to … Continue reading Industrial Scale Battery Storage of Wind & Solar Would Cause Surge in CO2 Emissions

via STOP THESE THINGS http://ift.tt/2kE7k62

May 19, 2017 at 07:30PM

Shale Isn’t OPEC’s Only Problem

Shale Isn’t OPEC’s Only Problem

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

A wave of new petroleum production from countries like Canada and Brazil is adding a new problem for OPEC nations who until now had been primarily preoccupied with U.S. output.

When OPEC meets in Vienna next week to discuss an extension of the production cut agreement it brokered with eleven other non-cartel petrostates, America’s shale producers won’t be the only suppliers on its mind: a number of other non-OPEC nations are also notching production increases that, taken together, are counterbalancing the petrostate effort to reduce the global oversupply of crude. The WSJ reports:

Not counting the U.S. and the 24 countries in the OPEC-led coalition, the next five biggest producing countries are poised to increase their combined output by around 300,000 barrels a day, according to a Wall Street Journal survey of five oil research agencies and investment banks.

Canada and Brazil, the world’s seventh and 10th biggest suppliers, are projected to record the fastest production growth outside the U.S. this year as long-planned projects come online. Norway and the U.K. are also seen as raising production this year, though by smaller amounts. Of the five countries, only China’s output is expected to fall this year.

This is part of the new oil reality that Daniel Yergin recently described as one characterized by a “cost recalibration.” Outside of the petrostate stalwarts, producers are adjusting to today’s lower price environment by trimming the fat and reaping efficiency gains (enabled by information technology) to stay profitable even at $50 per barrel crude. We’re seeing that most clearly in America’s shale formations, but Brazil, Canada, Norway, and the UK are on the same track.

OPEC & co. will almost certainly agree to extend their cuts through the end of the year next week. Saudi Arabia and Russia, the two biggest producers by output in this makeshift coalition, have already expressed a willingness to constrain output through March of next year. At this point, a majority of OPEC’s membership has come out in support of more cuts, which could make next week’s summit “a bit of a non-event,” according to commodity analyst Jan Edelmann.

Full post

 

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

May 19, 2017 at 07:30PM