Category: Uncategorized

Comparing Cameras

Comparing Cameras

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

Canon SX-720 pocket camera.

Nikon P-900

 

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

May 3, 2017 at 03:52PM

Smart Prosperity Institute’s Cleantech for Climate Change Report is Flawed- Canada Must be Grounded in Reality

Smart Prosperity Institute’s Cleantech for Climate Change Report is Flawed- Canada Must be Grounded in Reality

via Friends of Science Calgary
http://ift.tt/2on3Vep

Cleantech and decarbonization are the Holy Grail of investment and government subsidy hype, but practically speaking there have been numerous catastrophic failures of cleantech in recent years, both as investments and as subsidized programs. Tried and true natural resources are required to produce all clean tech products and innovations. This document – “Grounded in Reality” – examines some of the key success factors of nations like Finland, Israel, Denmark and Sweden which feature ‘cluster’ qualities touted by Harvard economist and author Michael Porter as competitive factors for economic success. This report reviews these markets and looks at some comparative factors regarding Canada’s competitiveness among nations.

LINK to report:

GROUNDED IN REALITY May 03 2017 FINAL

Prosperity Institute issued a policy brief in April 2017 entitled “Accelerating Clean Innovation in Canada.”  This document responds to that brief, rebutting and deconstructing much of the ‘cleantech’ hype with a more grounded approach.

In “Accelerating Clean Innovation in Canada”  the premise appears to be that if government would just underwrite ‘clean’ industries with subsidies, set clean energy standards (such as no emissions or low-carbon standards), put a price on carbon, engage in proactive procurement of goods to give clean industries a financial lift and market profile (i.e. buying Tesla cars for government fleets, installing fast charging stations), and establish clean tech/hi-tech ‘clusters,’ then it will follow that there will be success. Smart Prosperity claim that then Canada will “tap into a fast-growing global market expected to be worth as much as C$2.5 trillion by 2020.”

Likewise, reference is made to countries like Finland, Israel, Denmark and Sweden (FIDS) which have become world leaders in cleantech.  Friends of Science Society offers a general overview of some of the demographic, historic, cultural and contextual factors that appear to be the key drivers of the FIDS success, as a platform for discussion about the challenges Canada faces in a globally competitive environment.
Friends of Science Society argues that Smart Prosperity presents selective information without context, thus misleading the public on the actual costs and probabilities in developing a competitive clean tech cluster.

One thing is clear; no product in the world can be made without mined resources, reliable power and fossil fuels.  Fossil fuel by-products create a cascade of products and services that all people rely on everyday.  Canada has an existing Supercluster of oil/gas/oil sands/coal.  Hi-tech leaders like Samsung operate from South Korea, a country with no fossil fuels.  We buy their ‘clean-tech.’  They buy our coal. It is unlikely we can compete with them on clean-tech, though we may find and develop niche markets.

One of our findings is that all successful cleantech countries also feature busy ports with global transportation networks.  The smooth flow of goods and services is key to a country’s success. Canada’s vast distances and challenging geography and weather make this harder for all industries to succeed.  On top of that, Canadian ports and export markets for oil and gas are subject to blockades and regulatory challenges by Canadian anti-oil/LNG/tanker activists.

Contrary to Smart Prosperity’s position, replicating clean-tech success is not a matter of more government subsidizes, more regulation, more onerous standards, and more (carbon) taxes. It’s a matter of having a unified national vision and purpose, cadres of highly qualified scientists and technicians, championing entrepreneurs, and most importantly, moving goods to market. We examine some of these relevant factors in this report.

Smart Prosperity Institute issued a policy brief in April 2017 entitled “Accelerating Clean Innovation in Canada.”  This document responds to that brief, rebutting and deconstructing much of the ‘cleantech’ hype with a more grounded approach.

In “Accelerating Clean Innovation in Canada”  the premise appears to be that if government would just underwrite ‘clean’ industries with subsidies, set clean energy standards (such as no emissions or low-carbon standards), put a price on carbon, engage in proactive procurement of goods to give clean industries a financial lift and market profile (i.e. buying Tesla cars for government fleets, installing fast charging stations), and establish clean tech/hi-tech ‘clusters,’ then it will follow that there will be success. Smart Prosperity claim that then Canada will “tap into a fast-growing global market expected to be worth as much as C$2.5 trillion by 2020.”

Likewise, reference is made to countries like Finland, Israel, Denmark and Sweden (FIDS) which have become world leaders in cleantech.  Friends of Science Society offers a general overview of some of the demographic, historic, cultural and contextual factors that appear to be the key drivers of the FIDS success, as a platform for discussion about the challenges Canada faces in a globally competitive environment.
Friends of Science Society argues that Smart Prosperity presents selective information without context, thus misleading the public on the actual costs and probabilities in developing a competitive clean tech cluster.

One thing is clear; no product in the world can be made without mined resources, reliable power and fossil fuels.  Fossil fuel by-products create a cascade of products and services that all people rely on everyday.  Canada has an existing Supercluster of oil/gas/oil sands/coal.  Hi-tech leaders like Samsung operate from South Korea, a country with no fossil fuels.  We buy their ‘clean-tech.’  They buy our coal. It is unlikely we can compete with them on clean-tech, though we may find and develop niche markets.

One of our findings is that all successful cleantech countries also feature busy ports with global transportation networks.  The smooth flow of goods and services is key to a country’s success. Canada’s vast distances and challenging geography and weather make this harder for all industries to succeed.  On top of that, Canadian ports and export markets for oil and gas are subject to blockades and regulatory challenges by Canadian anti-oil/LNG/tanker activists.

Contrary to Smart Prosperity’s position, replicating clean-tech success is not a matter of more government subsidizes, more regulation, more onerous standards, and more (carbon) taxes. It’s a matter of having a unified national vision and purpose, cadres of highly qualified scientists and technicians, championing entrepreneurs, and most importantly, moving goods to market. We examine some of these relevant factors in this report.

cover grounded in reality smart prosperityGROUNDED IN REALITY May 03 2017 FINAL

via Friends of Science Calgary http://ift.tt/2on3Vep

May 3, 2017 at 03:22PM

Colorado Early Spring

Colorado Early Spring

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

Colorado Early Spring

Experts tell us that declining spring snow cover and an early spring are proof of global warming. I have been hearing this for years.

Snowpack is above normal across almost the entire western US.

Basin Snow Water Content Map (SNOTEL)

April 29 was the 4th coldest on record here in Boulder. Last year was 5th coldest. It was the first time we ever had two consecutive cold April 29th’s in a row.

We had 8 inches of snow on April 29, second largest April 29 snow on record. It snowed last year too.

Last year I attended a meeting of the Boulder Clean Power Plan at the University of Colorado. People there said they were very traumatized by climate change. I asked a prominent educator how she perceived the local climate was changing. The only thing she could think of was :

Well it seems like it snows more in the Spring than it used to.

I just took this picture with a Canon SX-720 pocket camera.

This entry was posted in

Uncategorized

. Bookmark the

permalink

.

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

May 3, 2017 at 03:22PM

Extent Of Multi-Year Ice Has Tripled Over The Past Decade

Extent Of Multi-Year Ice Has Tripled Over The Past Decade

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

The fake news press continues to bombard the public with claims that Arctic multi-year sea ice is disappearing. As recently as one hour ago.

As with almost everything else reported by the press about climate, the claims are completely fraudulent. The coverage of multi-year sea ice has tripled since 2008.

This animation shows the huge increase in the areal coverage of multi-year ice.

In 2009, experts announced that Arctic sea ice was “effectively gone.” Since then, the coverage of multi-year sea ice has more than tripled, and experts say it is “disappearing.”

Multiyear Arctic ice is effectively gone: expert | Reuters

You can reproduce my work on a Linux, Mac or Cygwin system using this script. On the other hand, you can’t reproduce the work of government climate scientists, because they are doing propaganda, not science.

#!/bin/tcsh

set MONTH=`date -v -1d +%m`
set DAY=`date -v -1d +%d`
set DATE=${MONTH}${DAY}
rm -f MYI_${DATE}.csv

foreach year (2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017)
    set LABEL=${MONTH}/${DAY}/${year}
    rm -f ice_type_nh_${year}${DATE}1200.jpg
    rm -f ice_type_nh_${year}${DATE}1200.gif
    echo ice_type_nh_${year}${DATE}1200.jpg
    echo http://ift.tt/2lUVJSa
    curl -O http://ift.tt/2lUVJSa
    convert ice_type_nh_${year}${DATE}1200.jpg -gravity center -pointsize 72 -background blue label:$LABEL -append                 ice_type_nh_${year}${DATE}1200.gif
    rm ice_type_nh_${year}${DATE}1200.jpg
    convert ice_type_nh_${year}${DATE}1200.gif ice_type_nh_${year}${DATE}1200.txt
    echo $year","`grep '#F' ice_type_nh_${year}${DATE}1200.txt | wc | awk -F" " '{print $1}'` >> MYI_${DATE}.csv
end

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

May 3, 2017 at 12:51PM