Month: March 2017

The DNA Of Oil Wells: U.S. Shale Companies Enlist Genetics To Boost Output

The DNA Of Oil Wells: U.S. Shale Companies Enlist Genetics To Boost Output

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

A small group of U.S. oil producers has been trying to exploit advances in DNA science to wring more crude from shale rock, as the domestic energy industry keeps pushing relentlessly to cut costs and compete with the world’s top exporters.

DNA

Shale producers have slashed production costs as much as 50 percent over two years, waging a price war with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).

Now, U.S. shale producers can compete in a $50-per-barrel oil market, and about a dozen shale companies are seeking to cut costs further by analyzing DNA samples extracted from oil wells to identify promising spots to drill.

The technique involves testing DNA extracts from microbes found in rock samples and comparing them to DNA extracted from oil. Similarities or differences can pinpoint areas with the biggest potential. The process can help cut the time needed to begin pumping, shaving production costs as much as 10 percent, said Ajay Kshatriya, chief executive and co-founder of Biota Technology, the company that developed this application of DNA science for use in oilfields.

The information can help drillers avoid missteps that prevent maximum production, such as applying insufficient pressure to reach oil trapped in rocks, or drilling wells too closely together, Kshatriya said.

“This is a whole new way of measuring these wells and, by extension, sucking out more oil for less,” he said.

Biota’s customers include Statoil ASA, EP Energy Corp and more than a dozen other oil producers. Kshatriya would not detail Biota’s cost, but said it amounts to less than 1 percent of the total cost to bring a well online.

A shale well can cost between $4 million and $8 million, depending on geology and other factors.

Independent petroleum engineers and chemists said Biota’s process holds promise if the company can collect enough DNA samples along the length of a well so results are not skewed.

“I don’t doubt that with enough information (Biota) could find a signature, a DNA fingerprint, of microbial genomes that can substantially improve the accuracy and speed of a number of diagnostic applications in the oil industry,” said Preethi Gunaratne, a professor of biology and chemistry at the University of Houston.

Biota has applied its technology to about 80 wells across U.S. shale basins, including North Dakota’s Bakken, and the Permian and Eagle Ford in Texas, Kshatriya said. That is a tiny slice of the more than 300,000 shale wells across the nation.

EP Energy, one of Biota’s first customers, insisted on a blind test last year to gauge the technique’s effectiveness, asking Biota to determine the origin of an oil sample from among dozens of wells in a 1,000-square foot zone.

Biota was able to find the wells from which the oil was taken and to recommend improvements for wells drilled in the same region, said Peter Lascelles, an EP Energy geologist.

“If you’ve been in the oilfield long enough, you’ve seen a lot of snake oil,” said Lascelles, using slang for products or services that do not perform as advertised.

Lascelles said DNA testing helps EP Energy understand well performance better than existing oil field surveys such as seismic and chemical analysis. The testing gives insight into what happens underground when rock is fractured with high pressure mixtures of sand and water to release trapped oil.

Biota’s process is just the latest technology pioneered to coax more oil from rock. Other techniques include microseismic studies, which examine how liquid moves in a reservoir, and tracers, which use some DNA elements to study fluid movement.

Full story

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

March 29, 2017 at 01:44AM

Why Won’t The UK Gov’t Tell The Costs Of Green Energy?

Why Won’t The UK Gov’t Tell The Costs Of Green Energy?

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

Britain’s government seems to have specifically removed quantitative estimates of the costs of wind and solar power from an official report.

The report was  published roughly one year late and has seemingly had most of its cost estimates removed. The few stats that remain are entirely qualitative and do not include numerical approximations, like dollars per megawatt hour, which would normally be considered the principal output of such research.

This means that instead of giving a dollar figure, the report makes statements such as labeling operating expenses on wind and solar power systems “small relative to the direct costs.”

“Given the sensitive nature of the subject, it is entirely reasonable to suspect deliberate suppression of embarrassing estimates,” Dr. John Constable, the GWPF’s energy editor, said in a press statement. “BEIS should without delay publish the unredacted study so that the interested public can assess the true cost of renewable energy.”

U.K. residents pay a whopping 54 percent more for electricity than Americans, and energy taxes cost residents roughly $6.6 billion every year. Green energy subsidies in the U.K regularly exceed spending caps, accounting for roughly 7 percent of energy bills, according to a government study.

Subsidies for green energy will make up 25 percent of power bills by 2020, according to a U.K. Parliament committee. The House of Lords committee warned U.K. power prices increased by 58 percent over the past decade, harming industry and costing families.

“In 2014, 10 percent of the cost of electricity for domestic users was due to climate change policies,” the committee reported. “The Government’s own analysis indicated that this is expected to rise to around a quarter by 2020. This is not transparent however as the cost of the policies is incorporated into electricity bills.”

Full post

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

March 29, 2017 at 01:44AM

US Coal Production On The Rise As Gas Prices Go Up

US Coal Production On The Rise As Gas Prices Go Up

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

After falling in six out of seven quarters since mid-2014, coal production rose in the third and fourth quarters of 2016.

graph of U.S. quarterly coal production, as explained in the article text

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Weekly Coal Report and Quarterly Coal Report and U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration

Among the coal supply regions, the Powder River Basin in Montana and Wyoming saw the largest increases in the second half of 2016. The increases in coal production were driven by an increase in coal-fired electricity generation, which occurred as natural gas prices increased.

graph of net electricity generation and average Henry Hub spot price, as explained in the article text

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Monthly, and New York Mercantile Exchange

Electricity generation accounts for more than 90% of domestic coal use. During the third quarter of 2016, warmer-than-normal temperatures led to increased electricity generation—the highest on record for those three months combined—which resulted in higher consumption of coal compared to the first half of 2016. In the fourth quarter, even as electricity generation declined, because natural gas prices remained higher than in previous quarters, the natural gas share of electricity generation fell and coal consumption increased slightly. During December, the coal share of monthly electricity generation surpassed that of natural gas for the first time since January 2016.

graph of U.S. quarterly coal production by basin, as explained in the article text

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Quarterly Coal Report, and U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration

Full post

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

March 29, 2017 at 01:14AM

Fresh doubt over Moorside power project as Toshiba’s nuclear unit Westinghouse files for bankruptcy

Fresh doubt over Moorside power project as Toshiba’s nuclear unit Westinghouse files for bankruptcy

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

By Paul Homewood

 

image

http://ift.tt/2nKVXLC 

From the Telegraph:

 

Toshiba’s nuclear unit Westinghouse has filed for bankruptcy protection, throwing fresh doubt on the UK’s plans to build Europe’s largest nuclear power plant.

The move, which had been expected, follows a series of heavy losses that have plagued the Japanese parent company.

Toshiba is expecting a loss of £3.5m for April-December of last year, including a £5bn hit from its embattled nuclear business.

The UK’s plans to build a giant 3.8GW nuclear power plant in Moorside in Cumbria have been at risk due to Toshiba’s struggles.

Toshiba is a 60pc shareholder in the NuGeneration consortium, which plans to develop the Moorside project alongside France’s Engie, formerly known as GDF Suez.

Toshiba has been struggling because of the difficulties in the nuclear arm

Toshiba has been struggling because of the difficulties in the nuclear arm Credit: EPA/CHRISTOPHER JUE

The new plant is slated to use the AP1000 nuclear reactor, which is made by Westinghouse.

Toshiba acquired Westinghouse in 2006 with much fanfare, making nuclear power an important part of its strategy.

But after the nuclear disaster in Fukushima in March 2011, costs in the business ballooned due to growing safety concerns and regulations, and a souring of sentiment toward nuclear power in some countries, such as Germany.

Toshiba has been eager to get Westinghouse, which has debts of £7.9bn, off its books to improve its plight.

The company reiterated its view that at the root of the problem was the acquisition of US nuclear construction company CB&I Stone and Webster in 2015.

An artist's impression of how the Moorside nuclear plant in Cumbria may look

An artist’s impression of how the Moorside nuclear plant in Cumbria may look Credit: PRESS ASSOCIATION

Toshiba, which has delayed the reporting of its financial results, said it would monitor Westinghouse’s rehabilitation proceedings and disclose information as quickly as possible.

Its chairman has resigned to take responsibility for the company’s troubles.

The Japanese company’s reputation has also been tarnished in recent years by a scandal over the doctoring of accounts to meet unrealistic profit targets.

Toshiba has said it will no longer take on new reactor construction projects and will focus on maintaining the reactors it already has. But it is also involved in the decommissioning of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant, which suffered multiple meltdowns after the March 2011 tsunami.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

March 29, 2017 at 12:30AM