Month: September 2017

New Study Identifies Natural Driving Forces Of Climate Change

 

Abstract

The identification of causal effects is a fundamental problem in climate change research. Here, a new perspective on climate change causality is presented using the central England temperature (CET) dataset, the longest instrumental temperature record, and a combination of slow feature analysis and wavelet analysis. The driving forces of climate change were investigated and the results showed two independent degrees of freedom —a 3.36-year cycle and a 22.6-year cycle, which seem to be connected to the El Niño–Southern Oscillation cycle and the Hale sunspot cycle, respectively. Moreover, these driving forces were modulated in amplitude by signals with millennial timescales.

Figure 1

Figure 1: The Driving force constructed using CET dataset and SFA with embedding dimension m = 13.

Introduction

Causality analysis in climate change is an active and challenging research area that remains highly uncertain. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)1 advocates that human activity is the most important driving force of climate change, while some researchers have argued that natural forces might be the main cause. These different views are mainly due to a lack of methods to address the complexity of climate system and insufficiency in observational climate data.

Global circulation model (GCM) simulations are generally used to investigate the causality of climate change. However, due to the limited knowledge of the climate system, large uncertainties are still associated with GCMs; therefore, the improvement of current GCMs to meet the requirements for causality analysis is still an urgent issue. An alternative method to GCMs is to use long-term observational climate data to study the driving forces of climate change, a method that has recently benefited from the great progress made by physical and biological scientists in studying the driving forces in non-stationary time series. The main advantage of this approach is that observational data can be used to directly extract the driving forces of an unknown dynamical system. This can be achieved by two techniques. The first technique involves finding the driving forces by studying the connections among different physical factors. These types of relations cannot be established using general correlation analysis, but only in dynamical directional influences. Granger causality2 is a pioneering approach for achieving this task. Mutual information and transfer entropy3 are used to identify cause-effect relationships between components which is equivalent to Granger causality in the linear case and some attempts have been made to extend Granger causality to the nonlinear case4,5. Recently, Sugihara et al.6 presented another effective method known as convergent cross-mapping (CCM) to justify causality in some biological complex systems. Tsonis et al.7 used CCM to identify a causal relationship between cosmic rays and interannual variation in global temperature.

The second technique is to directly extract the driving force information behind the observational data. For example, cross-prediction error8 and slow feature analysis (SFA)9 have been successfully applied to extract slowly changing driving forces from non-stationary time series. To evaluate SFA, a modified logistic map has been used to test the ability of SFA to construct the driving forces from an observational time series, and the results showed that there is a good agreement between the constructed and the true driving forces with a correlation coefficient of 0.99810. This suggests that SFA is suitable for extracting the driving force from observational time series.

Using SFA and the wavelet transformation technique, Yang et al.11(hereafter, Yang16) reconstructed and analyzed the driving forces for the monthly mean surface air temperature anomaly time series in the Northern Hemisphere, and found that the driving forces for this temperature climate system included two independent degrees of freedom that represented the effects of a 22-year solar cycle and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) on the climate system. Furthermore, they found that the driving forces are modulated in amplitude by signals with much longer time periods, this is, a long-term natural trend determined by the modulating amplitude signals.

The application of this method to climate change, which involves nonlinear and complex systems, is at a preliminary stage. The difficulties inherent in climate signal detection led us to further investigate the mechanism of the driving forces of the climate system. The present analysis for the temperature anomaly time series in the Northern Hemisphere needs to be verified and increased excavating and understanding of the causal effects directly from climatic observations is necessary with the longest instrumental record, the central England temperature (CET) dataset, which covers the Little Ice Age and some episodes of natural and anthropogenic warming of multidecadal duration.

Full paper

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)

http://ift.tt/2gulrHF

September 3, 2017 at 07:14AM

Weekend Unthreaded

For all the other stuff…

Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

via JoNova

http://ift.tt/2evc0as

September 3, 2017 at 05:34AM

Zeke Hasufather – The Climate Fraud Plausible Deniability Guy

Zeke Hausfather is the go to guy for climate fraud plausible deniability. Every time a story comes up about NASA/NOAA temperature adjustments cooling the past, he tells the press that NOAA adjustments actually warm the past. An example would be the urban heat island of Buenos Aires, where NOAA has indeed warmed the past.

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis

A closer look shows how Zeke is misleading the public.  In 1950 there were only about ten GHCN stations in South America with daily temperature data.

Two of those stations were located near Buenos Aires. One was in Buenos Aires and the other was a rural location 35 miles away in Uruguay, which stopped recording in 1996.

Buenos Aires had a strong warming trend from 1930 to 1995.

The rural station cooled by an equal amount.  

Both stations showed a decrease in the number of hot days.

NOAA did warm the past in Buenos Aires, but not enough to account for UHI. They show warming around Buenos Aires, where they should show cooling. NOAA then homogenized the UHI infected Buenos Aires data into the nearby rural data, and turned a cooling trend into a warming trend.  They also filled in South America with imaginary warming data in countries where they didn’t have any thermometers.

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Global Maps from GHCN v3 Data

NOAA shows warming from 1930 to 1995 near Buenos Aires, where they should show cooling. Zeke tells a tiny percentage of the story, in order to justify the unjustifiable.

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

http://ift.tt/2iQXQWd

September 3, 2017 at 05:22AM

5 Hurricane Charts Climate Alarmists Don’t Want You to See

There will be some who attempt to exploit national crises like Hurricane Harvey for political gain. But the most important thing is to look at the facts.

In the wake of the disastrous Hurricane Harvey, and another powerful hurricane developing in the Atlantic, there has been a ceaseless stream of attempts to link the natural weather events to man-made climate change.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, socialist-democratic Senator from Vermont and former Democratic presidential candidate, said that he thinks “it is pretty dumb” not to ask if the extraordinary damage caused by Hurricane Harvey is tied to climate change.

Here are five charts that provide context to the trend of hurricanes leading up to the huge national disaster that is Hurricane Harvey.

1. Nine Of The Ten Deadliest Atlantic Hurricanes

The historical record on the deadliest Atlantic hurricanes shows that many thousands of people died in hurricanes that occurred during atypically cold years. The Pacific hurricane record is similar.

Hurricane Harvey is projected to inflict $90 billion in damage to Texas and Louisiana, and at least 40 people have tragically died in the hurricane. It is important to realize that due to economic development, along with massive improvements in communications and transport, the financial amounts of damage from hurricanes are increasing, but the fatalities inflicted have drastically decreased.

An exhaustive research published at Reason Policy Studies shows deaths from extreme weather events have declined by 98% since 1900.

2. Global Tropic Cyclones at 45-Year Low

Dr. Ryan Mau/Twitter

Dr. Ryan Maue, a Phd.-credentialed meteorologist and hurricane expert, shows that global tropical cyclones (includes typhoons, hurricanes, and cyclones, which only vary in terminology by location) were at a 45-year low, up to figures compiled in April 2015.

3. Global Hurricane Frequency

Dr. Ryan Maue/Policlimate

Dr. Maue provides data from the last four decades of hurricane research showing no discernible uptick in the frequency of global hurricanes.

4. Global and Northern Hemisphere Accumulated Cyclone Energy

Dr. Ryan Maue/Policlimate

5. “Atlantic Tropical Storms Lasting More Than 2 Days Have Not Increased in Number”

The National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration provides a longer data set on Atlantic storms extending back to 1876.

Gabriel A. Vecchi and Thomas R. Knutson of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory/NOAA at Princeton, New Jersey, assesses the trend as the following:

“We find that, after adjusting for such an estimated number of missing storms, there is a small nominally positive upward trend in tropical storm occurrence from 1878-2006. But statistical tests reveal that this trend is so small, relative to the variability in the series, that it is not significantly distinguishable from zero.”

Full post

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)

http://ift.tt/2wyaX1A

September 3, 2017 at 05:13AM