The Week That Was: 2017-09-18 (September 18, 2017) Brought to You by SEPP (www.SEPP.org) The Science and Environmental Policy Project ################################################### Quote of the Week. “It is very obvious that we are not influenced by ‘facts’ but by our interpretation of the facts.”— Alfred Adler, Austrian medical doctor, psychotherapist, and founder of the school of…
via Watts Up With That?
September 18, 2017 at 03:17PM
The BBC has reprimanded the presenter of Radio 4’s Inside Science after he called on his Twitter followers to write to their local MPs about the reappointment of Graham Stringer, a climate change sceptic, to a parliamentary committee.
Adam Rutherford “potentially compromised the BBC’s impartiality” by publicly criticising the Labour MP’s return as a member of the Commons science and technology committee, the broadcaster’s editorial standards team said.
The BBC will stand by Rutherford but said that he had been advised of his responsibilities when using social media. In a response to a complaint by Stringer, it said Rutherford regretted the tweets and “accepts that he needs to consider carefully how his other published views might impact on his BBC work, and if necessary take advice from his editor at the BBC”.
Stringer welcomed the BBC’s “swift and appropriate response” to his complaint. He added: “I have been a member of the science and technology committee for 10 years. I have a degree in chemistry and have worked as a scientist in industry for a decade. I will continue to use my scientific training to look at all the issues that come before the committee, including global warming.”
This is not the first time Stringer and the BBC have been involved in a row over climate change. In 2015 the BBC apologised for a Radio 4 programme, What’s the Point of the Met Office?, after it was found to have committed a “serious” breach of impartiality and accuracy rules by not establishing that climate change sceptics were a “minority voice, out of step with scientific consensus”. In the programme, Stringer said there was no scientific evidence linking winter floods in Britain to climate change.
Stringer is a trustee of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, a thinktank chaired by the former chancellor Nigel Lawson that opposes policies aimed at limiting greenhouse gas emissions. The GWPF denies it promotes climate change denial, insisting it does not have an official view about global warming and is instead focused on providing the “most robust and reliable economic analysis and advice” regarding global warming policies.
Stringer was one of two MPs on the energy and climate change committee who in 2014 refused to endorse the findings of a UN climate panel that concluded humans are the dominant cause of global warming.
Rutherford, who has written for the Guardian, has presented Inside Science since 2013 and has worked on other programmes for the BBC, including Horizon.
His tweet about Stringer last week said: “We need you [sic] righteous indignation on this. Please write to your MPs. It is not OK to have science so misrepresented in a democracy.”
In the BBC’s response to Stringer’s complaint, Paul Smith, head of editorial standards and commissioning policy for BBC radio, said: “As a scientist Dr Rutherford might be expected to discuss any number of science issues, and the composition of the STC [science and technology committee] and its deliberations, are a legitimate area for Dr Rutherford to report and comment on.
via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
September 18, 2017 at 03:16PM
Greenland’s most famous glacier, the Petermann Glacier, has grown more than 5km over the past five years.
Fake news sources and fake scientists claim the exact opposite, because they are paid to lie about the climate.
You would have to be a complete moron to believe anything the Washington Post writes about climate, particularly when the source of their information is a government scientist.
via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
September 18, 2017 at 02:56PM
Greg Laden once wrote a long essay exhorting Americans to demolish more monuments with less hesitation. It climaxes with a stirring, Lutherian cri de coeur: Nobody loves historic preservation more than I do. Clearly. Here you stand, Greg Laden, on a rubble-pile of equestrian marble, trying to get it through our thick skulls: … Continue reading →
via Climate Scepticism
September 18, 2017 at 01:05PM
Iowa Climate Science Education 