JAMA summarily rejects Enstrom manuscript spotlighting errors in 2002 Pope PM2.5 study














JAMA summarily rejects Enstrom manuscript spotlighting errors in 2002 Pope PM2.5 study


JAMA editor-in-chief Howard Bauchner doesn’t want anyone to burst his PM2.5 science fraud bubble.

Below is Dr. Jim Enstrom’s February 21 letter to Bauchner:

Here Bauchner’s summary response on February 23:

Pope’s 2002 study is here.

JunkScience is not able to publish Enstrom’s manuscript as he intends it for a journal, but a summary of his points may be found here.








via JunkScience.com

http://ift.tt/2BTBk6L

February 26, 2018 at 11:55AM

Leave a comment