Our hypothesis that solar variation is affected by planetary motion, developed over the last 10 years here at the talkshop received a boost today when one of its main detractors, Anthony Watts, published an article declaring that solar cycle 24 is entering minimum.
I’ve left a comment there, something I rarely do since the debacle back in 2014 when Anthony and his sidekick Willis attacked our work and banned discussion of our solar-planetary theory. I’ll be interested to see if it passes moderation.
Here’s the plot I linked. It shows that Rick Salvador’s model is spot on track over the last 5 years.
http://www.pattern-recogn-phys.net/1/117/2013/prp-1-117-2013.pdf
The validation of Rick’s model is also an embarrassment for the Copernicus science publishing house, which shut down the journal we published in three weeks afterwards making never substantiated allegations that the peer review process was compromised. The real reason was that our work contradicted the IPCC claims that the Sun doesn’t affect climate change.
via Tallbloke’s Talkshop
May 23, 2018 at 09:19AM
Iowa Climate Science Education 