Arden Pope had 14 months to find an error in Jim Enstrom’s 2017 redo and takedown of Pope’s 1995 study. Despite Pope’s arm-waving no actual error was found. Here is the paragraph of Enstrom’s response: Read Enstrom’s entire response published in Dose-Response. Background/Additional Reading New study debunks key EPA PM2.5 study Dunn in Dose-Response: Enstrom’s … Continue reading Pope fails to find error in Enstrom’s 2017 reanalysis of Pope 1995 PM2.5 study
via JunkScience.com
May 30, 2018 at 12:27PM
Iowa Climate Science Education 