Month: June 2018

Second Quarter Report

Second Quarter Report

Since relaunching this blog in January, I’ve written 77 posts. Over the past three months, I began examining the anti-plastic crusade. (Stayed tuned for more on that topic.) I’ve published three posts on the ridiculously well-heeled Sierra Club:

I’ve written four on Canada’s unsavoury environmentalist:

And I’ve time-traveled back 50 years to examine the book that made Paul Ehrlich a household name:

The environmental perspective is not marginal. It is not underfunded. Rather, it’s promoted by scores of professional lobby groups worldwide. These groups have multi-million dollar budgets, corporate structures, and tons of lawyers on their payroll.

They are not David with a slingshot. They are Goliath.

In historical terms, this is an unprecedented power shift. How can ordinary citizens, beleaguered taxpayers, keep in check the immense influence of the green movement? How can we prevent its militant, often irrational perspective from sabotaging our economic well-being? How do we counter the clout it exercises at all levels of government? How do we challenge its self-serving PR on virtually every topic under the sun?

The answers are far from clear. But journalists surely need to subject the green movement to scrutiny and skepticism. That’s part of what I do.

Thank you for visiting this blog. Thank you for sharing my work on Facebook and on Twitter. At the end of every quarter, I ask for your help. If you think what I do is valuable, please make a donation today.

please support this blog

To those of you who paid me the enormous compliment of signing up for a regular, monthly contribution after reading my 1st quarter report, please know that your faith in me is highly motivating. You make a difference in my life.

Likewise, I’m grateful to those of you who now start your Amazon shopping by clicking on a book or advertisement on this website. Your thoughtfulness matters. It helps me pay the bills.

 

→ Receive posts via e-mail by signing up on the right side of this page, above – or by following this blog on Facebook and Twitter.

 

via Big Picture News, Informed Analysis

https://ift.tt/2ICvN4y

June 29, 2018 at 06:17AM

Hansen’s 350 PPM Tipping Point

NASA’s James Hansen originally warned that 350 PPM CO2 was the tipping point, and that we would all burn up and drown unless CO2 was reduced to those levels.

Hansen (et al) must read: Get back to 350 ppm or risk an ice-free planet – ThinkProgress

Data shows the exact opposite.  All of Cleveland’s hottest days occurred below 350 PPM, with the hottest day occurring the week of Hansen’s 1988 Congressional testimony. Since that week in 1988, Cleveland hasn’t had any really hot days.

Highest temperatures in Cleveland history | cleveland.com

The Arctic warmed ten degrees from 1940 to 1947, with CO2 below 310 PPM. It is 100% certain that Arctic warming has nothing to CO2 levels.

If the Antarctic ice regions and the major Greenland icecap should reduce at the rate of the present melting, he said, the oceanic surfaces would rise to catastrophic proportions.

  • May 31, 1947

31 May 1947 – The Arctic is melting says scientist – Trove

Arctic warming prior to the 1940’s troubled Hansen, so he simply erased it.

May 2018 Measured Vs. Adjusted

Global warming appeals to the left because :

  1. It blames humans
  2. The solution is more government control
  3. The solution is more taxes
  4. The solution is less personal freedom
  5. The solution is wealth redistribution

It has nothing to do with science.

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog

https://ift.tt/2ySM0ml

June 29, 2018 at 05:51AM

Record cold possible for Auckland

Never mention the ever growing and expanding urban heat island UHI – Record low temperatures possible in Auckland, Northland

via Errors in IPCC climate science

https://ift.tt/2Ky2KAP

June 29, 2018 at 05:45AM

Swansea Bay–The Basic Facts

By Paul Homewood

 

 

This letter appeared in the Telegraph the other day:

 image

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2018/06/26/lettersthe-uk-needs-hub-rival-schiphol-not-just-third-heathrow/

 

Leaving aside the question of HS2, the writer shows a total lack of understanding about Swansea Bay, which is probably due in turn to the wholly amateurish way it has been treated by most of the media.

 

So, for Tess’ benefit, here are a few basic calculations:

 

  • Cost of lagoon – £1.3bn
  • Electricity produced – 532 GWh pa, which is 0.15% of UK generation
  • This is enough to supply on average 40,000 homes
  • Therefore the cost per household is £32,500
  • There are an estimated 107,500 households in Swansea, so the lagoon could not supply half of the town.
  • Even after the capital costs, ongoing costs will be substantial, for instance dredging and maintenance and replacement of turbines.

If Tess thinks that sounds like a good deal, heaven knows what a bad one looks like!

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/2lF6yFz

June 29, 2018 at 04:39AM