By Paul Homewood
Andrew Marr and guests on the BBC this morning were bemoaning the fact that the Sunday Papers showed virtually no interest in the latest IPCC “We’re all going to die” scare.
As an example of the BBC’s approach to impartiality and balance, one of the two guests invited to review the papers was a certain Sian Berry. No, I had not either, but as well being a London Assembly member (town councillor to me and you), she is also co-leader of the Green Party, which tells you more about the quality of Green Party politicians than the ability of young Sian!
She actually had the nerve to suggest that Britain was lagging behind the rest of the world when it came to climate change. Unsurprisingly Marr did not challenge on such a dishonest statement.
The GWPF noted last week what the newspapers were headlining the day after the IPCC published its report:
There could of course be lots of reasons why neither the press nor the public appear to give a damn. Like:
- They have heard the same “Ten years to save the world” scare stories many times before.
- They know that the UK’s emissions are only 1% of the world’s and that whatever we do will have zero effect on anything.
- They also know that countries like China and India are continuing to build new coal power stations.
- Most are sensible enough to realise that a slightly warmer climate in Britain has made little difference to their lives.
- People have no intention of giving up their modern lifestyles, as the IPCC demands.
- They also have no intention of paying towards the $2.4 trillion a year also demanded.
- Above all, they have much more important things to worry about.
There has been, however, one item in the news today about the IPCC report. Unsurprisingly Marr did not mention it, as it was written by Christopher Booker. It certainly would not do for BBC viewers to learn about a denier’s point of view!
So astounding are the implications of that “special report” published last week by the UN Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) that the media didn’t really know how to handle it. Inevitably, last Monday, the BBC went into overdrive, leading its news bulletins with the story from morning till night. But most newspapers gave it only fairly perfunctory coverage, tucked away on an inside page.
To avert complete climate catastrophe, with wars, famine and disease spreading across the globe, says the IPCC, what it now proposes is nothing less than “unprecedented changes in all aspects of society” – ones that will affect almost every aspect of all our lives. This means, it says, that during the next 30 years we must reduce our CO2 emissions from fossil fuels to “net zero”. We must stop using virtually all the coal, oil and gas on which our modern industrial civilisation has been built.
To appreciate the scale of what this would involve, we may recall that, according to the International Energy Agency, the world currently relies on fossil fuels for 81 per cent of all the energy it uses.
As one measure of how far the report is based on wishful thinking, it does allow for very limited amounts of coal and gas still to be used; but only on condition that we find ways to capture their “carbon emissions” to bury them under the ground and to suck vast quantities of CO2 out of the atmosphere, both of these using technologies that, the report itself admits, have not yet been developed.
What we must do to replace those fossil fuels, we are told in a brief paragraph on page 29 of the 33-page report, is spend a mind-boggling $2.4 trillion (£1.8 trillion) every year until 2035 on new “energy infrastructure”. This will enable us to draw up to “85 per cent” of our energy from “renewables”, such as wind and solar. These currently supply only three per cent of the world’s total energy needs.
And, of course, the report does not explain that the only way to keep the lights on when the wind isn’t blowing or the sun shining would be to use instantly available backup from the gas that the IPCC wants to see eliminated.
The IPCC fondly imagines that all this would somehow keep the rise in global temperatures to “1.5C (2.7F) above pre-industrial levels”. But already the world has warmed by one degree of that amount since the 19th century, in the Modern Warming, which began when it emerged 200 years ago from the Little Ice Age. Until now, the IPCC has recognised that much of this was due to natural causes. But now, without proper explanation, this is all blamed on human activity.
So how does the IPCC justify its new mega-panic? This was summarised by one of the report’s organisers as “more extreme weather, rising sea levels and diminishing Arctic sea ice”. But even the IPCC itself, in its last major report in 2013, found that there had been no discernible increase in extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, floods and extreme heatwaves.
As for the controversial subject of those rising sea levels, as the world-renowned atmospheric physicist Dr Richard Lindzen put it in a lecture in London last week: “Sea level has been increasing at about eight inches per century for hundreds of years, and we have clearly been able to deal with it.”
As for Arctic sea ice, a graph from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) shows that, contrary to all those computer model predictions that the summer Arctic would soon be ice-free, there has, in fact, been only a comparatively modest decrease in the extent of Arctic sea ice since satellite records began in 1979; and there is evidence that there has been significantly less ice at times in the past.
Back in the real world, much more relevant to how we should view this latest IPCC report, and exactly as they indicated they would do at Paris in 2015, the leading CO2-emitting countries outside Europe, led by China and India, have continued to build fossil fuel power stations just as if Paris had never happened. However much those behind this report may delude themselves and try to delude the rest of us, the fact is that the rest of the world is no longer being taken in by their make-believe.
via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
October 14, 2018 at 04:30PM
Iowa Climate Science Education 