.
.
How feeble are wind and solar power in the big energy picture i.e. not just electricity production? It could be much worse than we/you thought, but many policymakers don’t seem to know – or don’t want to know – about such realities.
By Larry Bell ~
Those who believe in the existence of adequate non-fossil alternatives essential to achieve a “carbon-neutral” U.S. — much less global — energy balance anytime soon, or at any cost, are dreadfully misguided.
Nevertheless, there are very understandable reasons why such delusions continue to persist.
One reason behind this facetious fantasy has resulted from massively funded “renewable energy” industry subsidy-seeking propaganda campaigns.
Another is due to great successes of ideological anti-fossil activists in conflating carbon dioxide emissions with “climate pollution,” polar bear perils, and virtually any other “crisis” de jour.
A third, and one that I find particularly disturbing, is because even information sources we should expect to trust, continue to perpetuate a disingenuous and dangerous myth that non-fossil “alternatives” can meet any truly significant U.S. energy needs.
In preparing for this article, I checked data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) with a very…
View original post 723 more words
via Tallbloke’s Talkshop
June 24, 2019 at 12:04PM

Reblogged this on Climate- Science.
LikeLike