Month: February 2020

Fraser Nelson: The British Public Are Fighting Back Against The Digital Mob

There is much to learn from last month’s extraordinary general election. But one of the forces that took Johnson to No 10 is the backlash against cancel culture and those who seek to destroy others for jokes they make.

At the time of his death, Sir Roger Scruton was celebrated not just as one of the greatest philosophers of his lifetime but as someone who was able to defy – and expose – the mob. A Twitterstorm had erupted over words of his that had been maliciously twisted, and within hours he had been fired from his role chairing a government commission. But his treatment led to uproar, and his eventual reinstatement. Yet again, he made history: for once, the mob did not get its man.

Now we have Alastair Stewart, dropped by ITN for making what it called “errors of judgement” on social media. He had been quoting Shakespeare, citing lines from Measure for Measure that included the words “angry ape”. The person he had been debating with was black, and a daft row ensued. It ought to have ended, at most, in an apology – where Stewart would have made the obvious point that no offence was intended. Instead, it ended his 40-year career.

Over the years, we have seen the rise of what Americans call “woke capitalism”, where private companies are infected by the madness that started taking hold in university campuses some time ago. Typically, there will be a zealous Human Resources department that decides to become a cultural police force. Employees might be issued with rainbow-striped lanyards to celebrate Pride, or be invited to Black History Month. And if you hate identity politics, best keep quiet. You risk being painted as a bigot and, in the era of moral panic, to be accused is to be guilty.

Marketeers, too, panic. Last year, Nike dropped a line of trainers after complaints that the design – an early flag of the United States – had been adopted by white supremacists. A shopping centre in Reading evicted Chick-fil-A, an American fast food chain, after complaints that it was somehow homophobic. Among the supposed evidence that it donated to the Salvation Army.

The common theme, from Nike to the newsroom, is a complete failure to argue the case or to defend the truth. Does Nike regard the old Betsy Ross flag as a symbol of racism? Does anyone at ITN believe that Stewart is, in the slightest way, racist?

But when moral panic takes over, truth never matters – and social media trolls take control. You can see them on Twitter picking targets all day, seeking companies gullible enough to respond to digital pressure.

Sir Roger Scruton
Sir Roger Scruton managed to fight back against the mob – and win CREDIT:  DAVID ROSE

For example: “Acme Inc, are you okay with supporting the work of a bigot like Alastair Stewart?” The idea is to terrify Acme Inc into pulling their advertising. Or have them waver long enough to persuade the employer that the journalist is too much of a risk to have around, and ought to be let go. Or, in the parlance, “cancelled”.

Throughout the election campaign, there were attempts to “cancel” Boris Johnson. The Spectator’s online archives were deluged by Corbynites trawling 25-year-old articles for a quote here or there that could be taken out of context. Not so long ago, he was investigated by the Conservative Party itself on charges of Islamophobia after a joke he made in these pages about the niqab: a garment banned in several Muslim countries. But, again, facts didn’t matter. His critics just wanted to smear and destroy him.

It doesn’t seem to have done him much harm. Indeed, an important part of his support will be from those who admire how he speaks freely, how he is unafraid to make jokes and use satire. And that he doesn’t apologise, or run scared of any digital mob.

Of course, a politician who restricts his opinions and language to the rigorously-policed parameters of social media will never speak to the country. Failure to recognise this led Labour down a digital rabbit hole (along with much of the media) while the Tories won a historic majority.

This is politics, of a new and potent kind. There are a great many voters who might not care about Brexit but who do care that the jokes they crack might be used to destroy them, or those they love. That without voting for it, we have somehow entered a world where everyone is one off‑colour joke away from career death. This matters more than a marginal tax rate or the fate of HS2. It’s a force against which targets have no defence: to be accused is to be guilty. And victims are everywhere.

It can happen to Tim Hunt, the Nobel laureate forced to resign for an offhand remark about working with women. Or it could be Brian Leach, fired from Asda last year for sharing a Billy Connolly video which a colleague thought was Islamophobic. An American racing car driver recently had his sponsorship pulled because of remarks that had been uncovered from the early Eighties – but made by his father, not even by him.

The irony is that this time, there was no army of social media trolls demanding Alastair Stewart’s head. His Shakespeare quote generated a bit of fuss, but not much. Perhaps ITN overreacted to a handful of complaints. In any event, it was a calamitous misjudgment because the fury is now directed at them – and the way one of their longest-serving journalists has been treated.

Full post (£)

The post Fraser Nelson: The British Public Are Fighting Back Against The Digital Mob appeared first on The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF).

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)

https://ift.tt/2S6tdug

February 2, 2020 at 06:46AM

Another Green Flop: Electric Car-Sharing Scheme Scrapped In London After Poor Uptake

An all-electric car-sharing scheme in London is being scrapped next month in a setback to the capital’s ambitions to get more polluting vehicles off the road.

French-owned Bluecity, which ran a fleet of distinctive red battery-powered cars, said its £5-per-half hour service was no longer financially viable after it secured deals with only three London councils. It will officially shut down on February 10. 

A second car-sharing club, German-owned DriveNow, is pulling out of London at the end of next month. It operated 130 electric BMW i3 cars out of a total fleet of more than 700 vehicles.

Both services were “point to point”, allowing drivers to pick cars up, drive to anywhere in London and leave them there, in theory making it more flexible.

However, they were plagued by disappointing take-up and the bureaucratic obstacle course of dealing with 33 local authorities.

Bluecity, owned by the Parisian conglomerate Bolloré, was launched in Hammersmith & Fulham in April 2017. At the time the company, which operated the similar but now defunct Autolib scheme in Paris, said it planned to make 3,000 cars available in London.

In a statement today a Bolloré spokesman said: “Our mission has always been to deliver a smart and sustainable EV [electric vehicle] infrastructure whilst encouraging EV uptake across London. 

Due to the limited size of the network and the competitive environment, we have taken the difficult decision to close

Spokesman for Bolloré, owner of Bluecity

“Due to the limited size of the network and the competitive environment, we have taken the difficult decision to close the Bluecity car-sharing service.”

Full story

The post Another Green Flop: Electric Car-Sharing Scheme Scrapped In London After Poor Uptake appeared first on The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF).

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)

https://ift.tt/31mIX0y

February 2, 2020 at 06:32AM

Scientists Divided Over Impact Of Solar Minimum On Global Temperatures

Earth could face frosty weather and biting snow storms over the next 30 years as an ominous “solar minimum” grips the planet, a scientist has warned. Fortunately, it’s not all doom and gloom – other experts believe that a Grand Solar Minimum will have little effect on our climate.

The cold snaps – caused by the Sun entering a natural “hibernation” – threaten to trigger food shortages as temperatures slump across the planet, experts say.

Earth is bracing for a solar minimum: a quiet period in which the Sun fires less energy – or, heat – at our planet than usual.

According to Nasa, the Sun will reach its lowest activity in over 200 years in 2020.

This could cause average temperatures to drop as much as 1C in a cold spell lasting 12 months, according to Northumbria University expert Valentina Zharkova.

That might not sound like much, but a whole degree is very significant for global average temperatures.

 The Sun constantly blasts Earth with radiation, but is entering a 'quiet' phase in 2020
The Sun constantly blasts Earth with radiation, but is entering a ‘quiet’ phase in 2020Credit: Getty – Contributor

“The Sun is approaching a hibernation period,” Professor Zharkova, who has published multiple scientific papers on solar minimums, told The Sun.

“Less sunspots will be formed on the solar surface and thus less energy and radiation will be emitted towards the planets and the Earth.”

Solar minimums are part of the Sun’s natural life cycle and occur once every 11 years. However, 2020’s minimum promises to be an especially chilly one.

That’s because it marks the start of a rare event known as a Grand Solar Minimum, in which energy emitted from the Sun drops even more than usual.

These only occur once every 400 years or so. Most of the effects will be harmless.

 The solar minimum has been blamed for a recent cold snap in Canada that saw the mercury plummet to -50C
The solar minimum has been blamed for a recent cold snap in Canada that saw the mercury plummet to -50CCredit: Rex Features

However, Professor Zharkova warned icy spells and wet summers could persist until solar activity picks up again in 2053.

She listed recent unusual chills in Canada and Iceland as evidence of the Grand Solar Minimum (GSM) already taking hold.

“The reduction in temperature will results in cold weathers on Earth, wet and cold summers, cold and wet winters,” she told The Sun.

“We will possibly get big frosts as is happening now in Canada where they see [temperatures] of -50C.

“But this is only the start of GSM, there is more to come in the next 33 years.”

The last GSM to strike Earth was the Maunder Minimum, which lasted from 1645 to 1715.

During this period, the brightness of the Sun dropped and temperatures plummeted across the globe, according to Nasa.

The brutal cold decades saw famous waterways like the Thames and Amsterdam’s canals freeze regularly – events that are rare today.

 Earth can expect a barrage of brutal snow storms over the next 30 years as an ominous "solar minimum" grips the planet
Earth can expect a barrage of brutal snow storms over the next 30 years as an ominous “solar minimum” grips the planetCredit: Rex Features

Nasa readings of solar activity suggest our planet could find itself in the grips of a similar freeze by 2025.

Professor Zharkova added: “We can only hope that the mini ice age will not be as severe as it was during the Maunder Minimum.

“This would dramatically affect food harvests in middle latitudes, because the vegetables and fruits will not have enough time for harvesting.

“So it could lead to a food deficit for people and animals, as we seen in the past couple of years when the snow in Spain and Greece in April and May demolished they veggie fields, and the UK had a deficit of broccoli, and other fruits and veggies.”

 We can expect to see fewer 'Sun spots' appearing a the surface of our star
We can expect to see fewer ‘Sun spots’ appearing a the surface of our starCredit: AFP or licensors

Fortunately, it’s not all doom and gloom – other experts believe that Grand Solar Minimums have little effect on our climate.

Instead, the cold snap experienced during the Maunder Minimum was likely triggered by several factors, including plumes of ash coughed out by a series of giant volcanic eruptions.

We’re also expecting global warming to increase average temperatures in the coming decades.

It’s unlikely, therefore, that the upcoming GSM will have any impact on global temperatures, solar scientist Mathew Owens told The Sun.

“The small reduction in the Sun’s energy associated with a solar minimum is vastly offset by effects caused by human activity, such as CO2 in the atmosphere,” Professor Owens, of Reading University, said.

“Thus there will probably be no detectable effect on global climate.”

Full story

The post Scientists Divided Over Impact Of Solar Minimum On Global Temperatures appeared first on The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF).

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)

https://ift.tt/37UUwhO

February 2, 2020 at 05:54AM

Down Under, A Debate Rages On The Causes Of Australia’s Bushfires

CANBERRA, Australia — Australia is in the midst of an increasingly bitter face-off between those who fault climate change for devastating wildfires in Australia’s southeast and those who blame arson.

Humans burning fossil fuels and humans with criminal intent both factor into this unprecedented crisis. But just how to accurately apportion the blame has become a big political issue, especially among those who argue against deeper cuts to carbon emissions that scientists say trap heat in the atmosphere.

Firefighters blame lightning strikes for most of the major blazes in New South Wales and Victoria states, and many scientists say climate change is the main reason for the strength of Australia’s wildfires.

However, many posters on social media are blaming arsonists.

“More than 180 alleged arsonists have been arrested since the start of the bushfire season,” Donald Trump Jr., the U.S. president’s son, has tweeted.

Although it’s been discredited by AAP FactCheck, the fact-checking division of news agency Australian Associated Press, the statistic has been repeated thousands of times online.

AAP FactCheck, a partner in Facebook’s Third Party Fact Checking program, looking at misinformation on Facebook and Instagram, links the statistic to a statement by police in New South Wales — the worst fire-affected state — that said “legal action” had been taken against 183 people since November for “bushfire-related offenses.”

These included only 24 people charged over “deliberately-lit bushfires.” Legal action — which includes cautions — had also been taken against another 100 people for conduct that could be described as being careless during a fire ban. The statement did not detail the offenses alleged against the remaining 59 suspects.

Janet Stanley, a director of Australia’s National Center for Research in Bushfire and Arson, blames climate change for fueling the fires.

“In the past, there’s been little interest generally in why people light fires — whether it’s purposefully or accidentally or maliciously or recklessly — because climate change hadn’t kicked in and it really wasn’t such a problem because fire could fairly easily be put out,” said Stanley, who has studied arson-related wildfires for three decades.

“But because of climate change, this is not the case now. The conditions that make a fire very big and dangerous and spread quickly are now a great deal worse, so it’s much harder to put out the fire once it occurs than it was in the past,” she added.

Australian Deputy Prime Minister Michael McCormack believes arsonists are the major problem.

“It’s important to note that most of these fires have been caused by little Lucifers running around with matches and fire-starters and creating havoc,” McCormack told reporters, referring to child arsonists, while acknowledging that climate change was also a factor in the fire emergency.

However, Craig Kelly, a conservative lawmaker, said some people arguing that climate change is caused by human activity “have exploited these bushfires to push their own political barrow. The climate change alarmists want to hijack the debate and use these fires as an example.”

Full story

The post Down Under, A Debate Rages On The Causes Of Australia’s Bushfires appeared first on The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF).

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)

https://ift.tt/2OkFwC6

February 2, 2020 at 05:47AM