By Paul Homewood
h/t Dave Ward
In other words, this decision was apparently taken by a single individual, the ‘Editor’, in Wiki parlance, points out Dr Roger Higgs. His/her “consensus” (ironic choice of word) is based on the online discussion among Wikipedia ‘Users’ at that site (link here), each of whom was evidently asked to vote on whether to “Keep” or “Delete” the page. However, far from a consensus, by my count (please check it) there were 35 Deletes and 19 Keeps. What qualifies the Editor to dictate that 35 to 19 constitutes a consensus, and use that claim to justify deleting a key document on arguably the most important (and most expensive) global social issue since World War Two?
See also the uncensored List of scientists who (publicly) disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming
Full story
Most importantly of all, what does CONSENSUS have to do with SCIENCE?
via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
March 8, 2020 at 05:39AM
Iowa Climate Science Education 