Climate realist Pierre Gosselin of NoTricksZone was permanently suspended from Twitter yesterday, for posting an accurate description of a television report. “Vaccination complications: more serious side effects than expected? According to the Paul Ehrlich Institute, 0.02 percent of those vaccinated … Continue reading →
via Real Climate Science
April 29, 2022 at 03:52AM
As the Eagle carcass count mounts, it gets harder to ignore the wind industry’s wholly unnecessary slaughter of crucial apex predators. But, not only do governments ignore it, they grant licenses that mean the killers go Scott-free. In the US they’re euphemistically called “take permits”. As if a browsing shopper were being permitted to take an apple from the fruit stand without the need to pay for it.
And a quick reminder for the wind industry’s apologists, cars, cats and skyscrapers don’t kill Eagles – like the critically endangered Tasmanian wedge-tailed eagle, but 60m wind turbine blades with their tips travelling at 350Kph routinely smash them out of existence.
The wind industry itself, has spent a fortune to try and cover up the inconvenient little problem: Not Content with Lying About its Bird Slaughter-Houses, Wind Industry Sues to Cover up Death Count Data
And, when all else fails, they simply lie about it: Wind Industry Uses Fake Numbers to Cover Up Mass Bird & Bat Slaughter
Most, however, have taken up the government’s opportunity to kill with impunity and obtain their “take permits”, in advance. Here’s the story of one that didn’t.
Wind Project Developer Charged In Deaths Of Golden And Bald Eagles
Cowboy State Daily
Jim Angell
4 April 2022
A wind power development company whose windmills across the country have been blamed for the deaths of 150 golden and bald eagles over the past decade has been cited in the deaths of nine of the birds in Wyoming and New Mexico.
The federal government on Friday filed three misdemeanor charges against ESI Energy over the deaths of birds at the Cedar Springs wind development in Converse County, the Roundhouse development in Laramie County and the New Mexico Wind project in New Mexico.
In exchange for being charged in the deaths of nine of the birds rather than all 150, ESI has agreed to extensive changes costing up to $27 million at its wind farms in Wyoming, New Mexico, Florida, California, Colorado, Arizona, Michigan, Oregon, North Dakota, Illinois and Kansas.
In court documents, federal prosecutors said ESI consistently disregarded the advice of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in building the Cedar Springs, Roundhouse and New Mexico Wind projects.
The company was aware that golden and bald eagles were reported in the areas the project were built, the documents said, but proceeded with the construction regardless. The company also refused to obtain “eagle taking permits,” a permit granted when an activity — such as the operation of wind turbines — is expected to result in the deaths of some of the birds.
“ESI adopted a nationwide posture of not applying for eagle take permits; at no time did ESI or any of its subsidiaries or affiliated companies or their personnel or agents apply for or obtain any eagle taking permit authorizing the killing or wounding of any eagles relating to any of its wind power facilities,” the documents said.
However, ESI has recently changed its position on the bird deaths and has agreed to take steps in the future to minimize the impact of its windmills on the animals, the documents said.
“The (Department of Justice) believes, based on interactions with ESI counsel and management in recent months … that (ESI) has undergone a beneficial change in its approach to safeguarding public wildlife resources in the development and operation of its wind facilities,” it said.
The department is recommending a plea agreement that involves ESI reviewing the operations of 50 of its wind energy facilities, monitoring them for eagle deaths and working with the Fish and Wildlife Service to minimize threats to the birds.
The company has also agreed to work with the Fish and Wildlife Service to determine whether some of its windmills should be periodically stopped to avoid injuring or killing eagles and has agreed to remove all dead animals from around their windmills so the bodies will not lure the eagles into the area of the windmills.
The company agreed to spent up to $27 million on the effort, which will include the cost of revenue lost when windmills are shut down, over five years.
Such deaths among bird populations are an example of why windmills need to be better regulated in Wyoming, according to Lynn Montoya, a Laramie resident who with her husband has worked to block the development of an Albany County wind project.
“The killing of protected birds is just another example of why Wyoming needs to review its open door policies regarding industrial wind turbines,” she told Cowboy State Daily on Monday. “Wind energy companies have the technology available to reduce bird kill and eagle deaths by up to 82% … but choose not to purchase due to high expense.”
Cowboy State Daily
via STOP THESE THINGS
April 29, 2022 at 02:31AM
UAH have finally brought out their global map of lower troposphere anomalies for March 2022.
The satellite brightness sounders found overall decidedly unremarkable temperatures from the lower troposhere (surface to approx 8kms) across the wide brown land.
The BoM March Outlook for max temperature (daylight) Predicted much warmer than UAH satellites measured.
The BoM March Outlook for min temperature (night time) Predicted HUGELY warmer than UAH satellites measured.
Then for another BoM comparison you can look at the Max and Min actual anomaly maps for March.
BoM anomaly map for Max T you can adjust to see min – this link is for Outlooks on 3rd March – you can reset for late Feb.
Plenty to compare & contrast and ponder.
via Errors in IPCC climate science
April 29, 2022 at 01:19AM
“No wonder so many Texans refuse to acknowledge climate change; the planet’s fate relies on transforming not only our economy but our culture.”
“It’s not much of an exaggeration to say that climate change might come to a screeching halt if all humans switched to electric transportation and a vegetarian diet by 2030.”
It can be said: the climate alarmists worship at the alter of deep ecology. How else to explain why the parishioners of the Church of Climate refuse to question their premises or consider real-world roadblocks to their starry-eyed agenda?
Why do they refuse to seriously consider the eco-downsides of industrial wind turbines, solar slabs, and batteries–and the eco-benefits of CO2 enrichment and a moderately warmer and moister world?
All this in the face of alleged climate anxiety….
Houston Chronicle Bias
The Houston Chronicle has shamed itself and Houston as a Progressive Left rag with a Sports Section thrown in to keep the readership. Lots of cancel culture to those with different options, including climate and fossil-energy optimists, a situation to which I can personally attest.
There are no conservatives, classical liberals, or libertarians of note at this newspaper, which pretty much tells you that intellectual diversity is not valued, and idea competition is feared.
Daily fare at the Chronicle is all about renewable energy this-or-that, with criticism muted and cheerleading rampant. Fossil fuels are demonized at every editorial turn. And little wonder that Houston foundations have teamed together to give the big-paper monopolist some competition (the sooner the better).
Business editorialist Chris Tomlinson is the worst when it comes to energy (see the Appendix below). And he fears hometown competition too (“What I find difficult to grasp is why donors are financing a new nonprofit that will compete for funding in a city with a healthy daily newspaper….”)
Beef Angst
And now to my beef with Tomlinson’s beef with beef, “Fighting Climate Change Requires Changing Texas Beef and Oil Culture” (October 25, 2021).
Never mind that climate alarm results from exaggerated predictions from unreliable, groping models–and that data indicate global lukewarming and moderate sea level rise (etc.), a story for another day.
Never mind Tomlinson’s large conflict-of-interest that an intimate has made millions of dollars as a developer of solar and wind projects, which rely on taxpayers (see here and here).
———–
Here is Tomlinson’s editorial (followed by a final comment):
An industry that emits far more greenhouse gases per unit of energy produced than oil or natural gas happens to be another Texas mainstay: cattle raising.
No wonder so many Texans refuse to acknowledge climate change; the planet’s fate relies on transforming not only our economy but our culture.
Raising, slaughtering and delivering a pound of ground beef to a customer’s home releases 13 pounds of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Onshore oil producers on average release 26 pounds of carbon when producing a 42-gallon barrel of oil.
People who eat beef do 10 times more damage to the climate than vegetarians, according to peer-reviewed studies published in Nature Food. Eating pork is six times as destructive while limiting yourself to chicken is only twice as bad as going vegetarian.
“The Economist” magazine recently pondered regulating beef like coal.
Food production accounts for a third of the world’s greenhouse emissions, double those released by the United States. It’s not much of an exaggeration to say that climate change might come to a screeching halt if all humans switched to electric transportation and a vegetarian diet by 2030.
Of course, change that radical will never happen. A lot of Texans consider an affordable steak dinner and a big pickup truck God-given rights. But as world leaders gather in Glasgow, Scotland, next week to discuss the next steps in preserving the climate for future generations, they will examine a plethora of ideas, including food systems.
Populations are declining in wealthy countries, but low-income nations are still growing. Food security is worsening where weather patterns are disrupting agriculture and triggering an economic collapse.
Global communications have also raised lifestyle expectations. Every person with a screen knows what Texas barbecue looks like, and they are not going to stay home and starve when they know a better life is available elsewhere.
Much of the migration from Central America is driven by climate-driven agricultural collapse. A 2019 report by the non-partisan thinktank American Security Project predicted waves of migrants would soon arrive at our southern border due to long-term, climate-induced drought and crop failures. Well, they’re here.
We need a global approach that balances demand for more and better food sources with the need to plant more trees to capture carbon, all the while improving standards of living. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions is critical.
In my travels to more than 60 countries, I’ve found that farmers know the climate is changing. They are struggling to adapt with new seeds, different planting techniques or completely new crops. The more challenging proposition is convincing North Americans they must do their part.
Despite powerful hurricanes or polar vortexes that have destroyed our property and killed our neighbors, many Texans will never accept that 200 years of massive population growth and industrialization in the United States has taken a toll on the atmosphere.
Too many people cannot acknowledge that their life’s work providing affordable protein and energy that Americans demanded will ultimately degrade their grandchildren’s quality of life.
Even more Texans argue that limiting greenhouse gas emissions is too disruptive to our present-day lives and economies. Therefore, we should accept a hotter, drier and stormier world. Better to let future generations cope with climate change tomorrow than risk making people less comfortable today….
For four generations, humans have believed they are masters of the universe. Thanks to technology and industrialization, animal protein is more available and affordable than at any point in human history. We’ve made energy equally cheap and abundant.
Texas’s culture and economy celebrate these accomplishments. Confronting the myth that we can consume all the beef and fossil fuels we desire directly contradicts our anything-is-possible attitude. But everything has a price.
We will pay for our profligacy one way or another, either by changing our sources of protein and energy or dooming future generations to worsening weather and natural disasters.
Business people and economists talk incessantly about how transforming our culture offers enormous potential for wealth creation. But humans are not always rational, especially when it comes to their way of life.
Americans are certainly going the other way than Tomlinson preaches. Beyond Meat Company sales are down, and its stock price is at record lows. Beef consumption is increasing with Texas as the leading cattle/calve state in the country, almost double that of Nebraska. But the Chronicle business editorialist will not dare do a story about these trends–or the inherent consumer advantages of oil, gas, and coal against dilute, intermittent, market-rejected wind and wind and large-scale battery packs.
It is time for Chris Tomlinson to question climate exaggeration; tell us the full story about wind, solar, and batteries; and at least let others enjoy a flame-kissed cheeseburger or BBQ plate without eco-guilt. Big brother elitism/authoritarianism is a scary thing in the context of climate alarmism/forced energy transformation.
Appendix
Tomlinson Bullies the “Bullying” Oil Industry December 14, 2021
Chris Tomlinson Gets Ugly against Petroleum (Houston Chronicle bias shines through) December 9, 2021)
Business Columnist vs. Fossil Fuels & Capitalism (Houston Chronicle’s biases shine through) March 5, 2019
Also see:
On the Houston Chronicle’s Editorial Crusade Against Fossil Fuels (September 10, 2019)
Getting in the Houston Chronicle (back window better than nothing, I guess) (July 28, 2021)
Houston Chronicle vs. Petroleum: The Latest (May 6, 2020)
“Save Earth”: Houston Chronicle Goes 1970s (Malthusian alarm getting long in the tooth) (April 30, 2019)
Houston Chronicle: Preaching Climate Alarmism Post Harvey (October 4, 2017)
Politicizing Harvey in the Houston Chronicle (September 6, 2017)
Houston Chronicle Editorial: A Global-Warming Scare Story (January 18, 2017)
Houston Chronicle: Former Environmental Writer Documents Origins of Left/Alarmist Bias at the Paper (November 12, 2009)
The post Tomlinson’s Beef against Beef (Houston Chronicle editorialist says we’re irrational) appeared first on Master Resource.
via Master Resource
April 29, 2022 at 01:08AM
Iowa Climate Science Education 