A new paper appearing in the prestigious New England Journal of medicine titles: “Effects of Previous Infection and Vaccination on Symptomatic Omicron Infections” by Altarawneh et al find that vaccines are worse than what they are claimed to be and that natural immunity is better.
The study, investigated vaccination rates and immunity among more than 100,000 Omicron infected and non-infected individuals.
“The authors found that those who had a prior infection but no vaccination had a 46.1 and 50 percent immunity against the two subvariants of the Omicron variant, even at an interval of more than 300 days since the previous infection,” reports the Epoch Times here. “However, individuals who received two doses of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccine but had no previous infection, were found with negative immunity against both BA.1 and BA.2 Omicron subvariants, indicating an increased risk of contracting COVID-19 than an average person without prior infection and vaccination.”
Six months after getting two doses of the Pfizer vaccine, immunity against any Omicron infection gradually dropped to -3.4 percent, below an average person without infection and vaccination (control) which would be set at 0.
For two doses of the Moderna vaccine, immunity against any Omicron infection dropped to -10.3 percent after more than six months since the last injection.
The authors reported that three doses of the Pfizer vaccine increased immunity to over 50 percent. However, considering that immunity was measured at only 42 days after the third vaccination, this is a very rapid immune decline over a short time period.
In comparison, previous infection gave 50 percent immunity, even over 300 days after the infection, which is a far longer period of protection.”
Toxic diabolical mistake
Meanwhile, Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser for the drug company Pfizer, warns that the use of the spike protein in the shot is “a diabolical mistake” and that the spike protein is also “toxic and mutates rapidly”. Read more here.
Donate – choose an amount
via NoTricksZone
July 2, 2022 at 12:35PM
Iowa Climate Science Education 
Here’s what the paper ACTUALLY reported:
(Not: BA.1 and BA.2 are Omicron variants.)
They did not find that “natural immunity is better.” Natural immunity is longer-lasting than a two-dose mRNA regimen, but far more dangerous to acquire. They found that natural immunity is no more effective than three vaccine jabs (i.e., one booster).
The Epoch Times headline, “Vaccination Increases Risk of COVID-19 Infection,” is a plain lie. The study reported no such thing.
They found that there was no statistically significant difference in risk of symptomatic disease between being unvaccinated with no previous infection and having been vaccinated >6 months earlier with no booster (median interval 270 days). However, vaccination with a recent booster reduced risk of symptomatic disease by about 50% (roughly the same as having had a prior infection).
More importantly, the study authors also reported:
and:
As for Yeadon, it’s been over ten years since he worked at Pfizer, and when he did work there he had nothing to do with vaccines. Calling him a former Pfizer executive is a attempt to mislead people into thinking that he’s some sort of whistleblower, with insider knowledge.
There was no circumstance under which vaccination conferred a detectable disadvantage. The ONLY metric by which vaccination conferred no advantage was:
1. When comparing total (mostly mild) symptomatic infection rates between people with neither previous infection nor vaccination against people who had gotten vaccinated >6 months earlier (median time 9 months). Those rates were statistically indistinguishable.
Vaccination conferred an advantage in all of these cases:
2. Among people who had a prior Covid-19 infection, when comparing total symptomatic infection rates. Vaccination reduced their risk of another infection.
3. Among people had not had a prior Covid-19 infection, when comparing total symptomatic infection rates, 3 jabs (initial vax + booster) reduced risk by about 50% compared to people who were unvaccinated.
4. Among people had not had a prior Covid-19 infection, vaccination reduced risk of severe, critical or fatal disease by >90%.
From my quick skim it appears that they did not report by how much vaccination reduced risk of severe, critical or fatal disease among unvaccinated people who had natural immunity from having survived a previous infection (probably because of insufficient sample size).
There is no evidence of widespread, serious side-effects from the Covid-19 vaccines. In this study, age-adjusted all-cause mortality risk for an unvaccinated person was a whopping 3.2× all-cause mortality risk for someone (like me) vaccinated with Moderna:
● https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7043e2.htm
● https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7043e2.htm#T3_down
Do not believe the lies from the likes of Mercola, Yeadon, RFK Jr, and Alex Jones. You are far safer getting vaccinated than going unvaccinated, and vaccination is modestly helpful even if you have survived a previous Covid-19 infection.
LikeLike