“In contrast, the Temperature.global compilation of actual temperature measurements from surface
stations has September only slightly warmer than the average monthly temperature of the past 8 years and 9 months, and far from the warmest month since January 2015.”

Not sure if there’s much point reading after that.

Unless someone will actually explain how Temperature.global works, why would anyone trust it’s values that have no relation to any serious data set, satellite or surface?

Still it’s good to see agreement that temperatures from surface instruments are more reliable than from satellites.