We covered to original decision to forego air conditioning here.

The 2024 Paris Olympics are shaping up to be an event filled with athletic prowess and, unsurprisingly, a hefty dose of virtue signaling. The recent announcement that air conditioning will not be provided at the Olympic venues is a prime example. In a bid to flaunt their environmental consciousness, the organizers have decided to rely on “sustainable” cooling methods, leaving teams to fend for themselves in the sweltering Parisian summer. And fend they did! Teams are now bringing their own portable air conditioners, making a mockery of the original intent and highlighting the absurdity of the decision.

Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo has been quite vocal about her commitment to making the 2024 Olympics an exemplar of environmental responsibility. The decision to forgo traditional air conditioning in favor of passive cooling techniques is touted as a major step toward reducing the event’s carbon footprint. According to Hidalgo, “These Games will be the first ones with a positive contribution to the climate” and are committed to “innovative solutions that are carbon neutral”​​.

But let’s be clear: sustainability, as currently promoted, is a nebulous concept that often amounts to nothing more than vapid virtue signaling. It’s an easy catchphrase, with no real objective definition for politicians and organizers who want to appear forward-thinking. The idea that passive cooling could sufficiently counteract the summer heat in Paris is more of a fanciful notion than a feasible plan.

Instead of applauding this so-called innovation, teams are responding with pragmatism. The U.S. teams, for instance, have decided to bring their own portable air conditioning units to ensure their athletes perform at their best. This reaction not only makes sense but also underscores the glaring disconnect between the idealistic aspirations of the organizers and the on-ground realities of hosting a global sporting event.

“As you can imagine, this is a period of time in which consistency and predictability is critical for Team USA’s performance,” Hirshland said. “In our conversations with athletes, this was a very high priority and something that the athletes felt was a critical component in their performance capability.”

The Washington Post reported earlier this month that Germany, Australia, Italy, Canada and Britain were among the other countries with plans to bring air conditioners to France.

https://apnews.com/article/olympics-air-conditioning-paris-0f753df91956f3fe61ad4febaff0ebb9#

One can almost hear the collective sigh of relief from the athletes who won’t have to pretend that sweating profusely in high temperatures is a symbol of their commitment to the planet. “The Games’ organizers have said air-conditioned rooms are not environmentally sustainable and can emit up to 100 grams of CO2 per hour, per square meter, into the atmosphere”​​. Yet, it’s the athletes who are left to deal with the consequences of this flawed policy.

The irony here is palpable. While the organizers pat themselves on the back for their green policies, the reality is that the burden of maintaining comfort has simply been shifted to the teams themselves. Portable air conditioning units are not exactly emissions-free, and their widespread use by multiple teams will likely offset any environmental gains touted by the organizers. The supposed environmental benefits of these “sustainable” measures evaporate in the face of practical needs.

The decision to forego air conditioning highlights the hypocrisy underlying many green policies. The optics of virtue signaling often overshadow practical solutions. By focusing on symbolic gestures rather than substantive changes, the Paris Olympics organizers have inadvertently highlighted the limitations and impracticalities of their approach. The statement from the organizers that they are “pioneering new cooling systems” using “natural ventilation, shades, and water spray systems” sounds impressive, but falls short when considering the actual comfort of the athletes and spectators​​.

The decision to forgo air conditioning at the Paris Olympics was meant to signal a commitment to sustainability. Instead, it has become a case study in the absurdity of virtue signaling when divorced from practical considerations. The teams’ choice to bring their own air conditioning units is a pragmatic response to an ill-conceived policy, demonstrating that when it comes to high-stakes events like the Olympics, realism and practicality prevail over performative environmentalism.

H/T moriarty