Month: June 2024

No, BBC, It Was Not An Extreme Heatwave In Phoenix

By Paul Homewood

.

h/t Paul Kolk

 

More heatwave fraud from the BBC:

.

 image

Human-induced climate change made recent extreme heat in the US south-west, Mexico and Central America around 35 times more likely, scientists say.

The World Weather Attribution (WWA) group studied excess heat between May and early June, when the US heatwave was concentrated in south-west states including California, Nevada and Arizona.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czvvqdg8zxno

.

Temperatures in Phoenix reached a high of 113F during early June:

image

http://climod2.nrcc.cornell.edu/

.

The BBC know they can fool some people who don’t realise temperatures like these are normal in places like Phoenix.

.

image

http://climod2.nrcc.cornell.edu/

.

The record June temperature was 122F in 1990, and thirty years since 1933 have had higher temperatures than 113F in June:

image

http://climod2.nrcc.cornell.edu/

As for the length of the heatwave, Phoenix has had four days over 110F so far in June. In June 1974 they had eighteen!

 

image

.

As usual the BBC rely on Weather Attribution models which are clearly fraudulent, and designed for propaganda purposes only. Given that this heatwave was not even extreme, the rest of the claim is plainly a con-trick.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/o5lVurm

June 21, 2024 at 04:40AM

Covering Climate Now

By Paul Homewood

We have discussed Covering Climate Now before. It is just one of the organisations whose role is to coordinate the message when it comes to climate.

 

 image

image

Our Story

Covering Climate Now supports, convenes, and trains journalists and newsrooms to produce rigorous climate coverage that engages audiences.

Co-founded in 2019 by Columbia Journalism Review and The Nation magazine in association with the Guardian and WNYC, CCNow invites journalists everywhere to transform how our profession covers the defining story of our time. Unless news outlets around the world dramatically improve and expand their climate coverage, there simply will not be the public awareness and political will needed to tackle the crisis.

With hundreds of partner news outlets from over 60 countries reaching billions of people, CCNow helps journalists produce more informative and appealing coverage of the climate crisis and its potential solutions.

We invite journalists and newsrooms worldwide to join our community and to help all of us produce exceptional journalism that engages audiences, holds power to account, and inspires change.

https://coveringclimatenow.org/about/

I get their regular emails, including this one yesterday:

Why Don’t More Voters Care About Climate Change?
Even as deadly heat has scorched much of North and Central America this month, new polling data finds that climate change is still not a top issue for most voters. It’s important for journalists to understand why that is — and to look at their own obligation to help the public understand the monumental climate stakes of the 2024 elections.
The survey results, released by the climate change communications programs at Yale and George Mason universities last week, show that climate ranks 19th among the 28 issues that registered voters prioritize ahead of the November elections. Only President Joe Biden’s political base — liberal Democrats, who comprise roughly one-quarter of the electorate — ranked climate change among their top four issues (along with protecting democracy, abortion, and health care).
There’s a lot for journalists to consider in these results. Would climate change be a higher priority for American voters if more of them understood its connection to the dangerous heat blasting much of the world? Do voters have a clear enough understanding of how a warming climate affects every aspect of their lives?
The Guardian reported today that scientists at World Weather Attribution have concluded that the heat wave that has killed over a hundred people and withered crops across northern Central America, Mexico, and the southern US was made 35 times more likely by climate change — a ferocious start to what will undoubtedly be a brutal summer. Yet most news coverage continues to ignore the connection between climate change and extreme heat, not to mention the fact that climate change itself is driven by fossil fuel use. A new Media Matters report shows that just 12% of national TV segments aired during the recent heat wave in the southwest US made connections to climate change.
There are important exceptions that deserve praise. Almost half of CBS’s segments included explicit links between heat and climate change, far outstripping its competitors in coverage. The network’s local segments and streaming videos — which also spell out the role fossil fuels play in the heat wave — show just how easy it can be to make climate connections for audiences. (For more examples of how to make the climate connection, check out CCNow’s recent extreme heat reporting guidance.)
Those connections are key to helping voters grasp the stakes of November’s elections. “The more people understand climate change’s ‘here, now, us’ realities,” Ed Maibach, a professor at George Mason and director of the university’s Center for Climate Change Communication, told Covering Climate Now, “the more they support ambitious climate policies and candidates who will propose such policies.”

.

It says a lot about how they go about spreading disinformation. And they are determined that journalists and newsrooms worldwide spread the same controlled, deceitful message.

Despite their efforts, fortunately, voters are not buying it, as their polling data shows. And is it any wonder, when ordinary people in the US are suffering from declining standards of living, mass immigration, high crime and inflation.

Expect the level of disinformation and climate propaganda to be stepped up as the US elections approach.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/D6bCRZO

June 21, 2024 at 04:36AM

BBC Pushes U.S. Heatwave Story but Buries ‘Junuary’ Winter Storm Story

From THE DAILY SKEPTIC

by Sallust

The BBC has a story today about the heatwave in May and early June the southwestern U.S. and Mexico. Apparently, a report by the World Weather Attribution (WWA) group has claimed that climate change made the heatwave 35 times more likely, though exactly what that means goes unexplained.

The World Weather Attribution (WWA) group studied excess heat between May and early June, when the U.S. heatwave was concentrated in south-west states including California, Nevada and Arizona.

Extreme temperatures in Mexico also claimed lives during the period.

Such attribution studies take some time to complete, so it is too soon for scientists to say how much of a role climate change is playing in the current heatwave stretching from the centre of the U.S. through to the north-east and into Canada.

In their new report, the scientists said such a heatwave was now four times more likely than it was in the year 2000, driven by planet-warming emissions.

Many extreme weather events including heatwaves are becoming more frequent and intense as a result of climate change, experts say.

“The results of our study should be taken as another warning that our climate is heating to dangerous levels,” said Izidine Pinto, Researcher at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.

“Potentially deadly and record-breaking temperatures are occurring more and more frequently in the U.S., Mexico and Central America due to climate change.

“As long as humans fill the atmosphere with fossil fuel emissions, the heat will only get worse – vulnerable people will continue to die and the cost of living will continue to increase.”

The WWA study focused on a region including the US south-west and Mexico, as well as Guatemala, Belize, El Salvador and Honduras which also saw dangerously high temperatures.

The interesting thing about that BBC story is the complete lack of any mention of the spectacular plunge in temperatures across the northwestern United States as a major winter storm crossed over the Rockies into Montana and Idaho. Newsweek has the story:

The calendar may be showing a date in summer, but no one seems to have told the weather — with forecasters warning of a “winter storm” for some areas despite it being mid-June.

Parts of Montana and Idaho were both hit with a “winter storm warning” by the National Weather Service (NWS), which published a map on Monday showing which regions were to be affected. Up to 15 inches of snow was possible in some areas overnight, the experts said, as they warned of the dangers for drivers and possible power outages.

WUSA9 has a video of the effects. Of course, the American West has always been prone to such extreme events, as USA Today points out:

Great Falls is scorching hot.

Great Falls is frigid.

During a week of weather extremes in the U.S., it all depends on which Great Falls the mercury is measured.

In Great Falls, Virginia, Luke Mraz, lugged a 100-pound hose around a golf course, spraying pond water over several acres of dry grass as the temperature climbed to 92 degrees.

“It feels like the moisture is literally just getting sucked right out of your body,” the 27-year-old said.

In Great Falls, Montana, a 127-year-old record for cold fell with temperatures reaching 45 degrees, according to the local National Weather Service office. A freak June mountain snowstorm even enticed a few skiers up to Showdown, the local ski hill.

“After a less-than-typical snowfall year, we’re welcoming the moisture,” said Avery Patrick, one of the resort’s owners.

Of course, the BBC stuck resiliently to the story about a heat dome in the U.S. (but managed a fleeting mention of the Montana storm in an online report that had to be hunted down for Daily Sceptic). Make of all that what you will.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/V2IB5zk

June 21, 2024 at 04:05AM

Net Zero Will Prevent Almost Zero Warming, Say Three Top Atmospheric Scientists–Daily Sceptic

By Paul Homewood

 

 

Latest from Chris Morrison

image

Recent calculations by the distinguished atmospheric scientists Richard Lindzen, William Happer and William van Wijngaarden suggest that if the entire world eliminated net carbon dioxide emissions by 2050 it would avert warming of an almost unmeasurable 0.07°C. Even assuming the climate modelled feedbacks and temperature opinions of the politicised Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the rise would be only 0.28°C. Year Zero would have been achieved along with the destruction of economic and social life for eight billion people on Planet Earth. “It would be hard to find a better example of a policy of all pain and no gain,” note the scientists.

In the U.K., the current General Election is almost certain to be won by a party that is committed to outright warfare on hydrocarbons. The Labour party will attempt to ‘decarbonise’ the electricity grid by the end of the decade without any realistic instant backup for unreliable wind and solar except oil and gas. Britain is sitting on huge reserves of hydrocarbons but new exploration is to be banned. It is hard to think of a more ruinous energy policy, but the Conservative governing party is little better. Led by the hapless May, a woman over-promoted since her time running the education committee on Merton Council, through to Buffo Boris and Washed-Out Rishi, its leaders have drunk the eco Kool-Aid fed to them by the likes of Roger Hallam, Extinction Rebellion and the Swedish Doom Goblin. Adding to the mix in the new Parliament will be a likely 200 new ‘Labour’ recruits with university degrees in buggerallology and CVs full of parasitical non-jobs in the public sector.

Read the full story here.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/tEDfJCU

June 21, 2024 at 03:23AM