Month: August 2024

Liberal City Tries to Tax Buildings Using Gas After Court Smacked Down Its Outright Ban On Gas Stoves

From the DAILY CALLER

Daily Caller News Foundation

Nick Pope
Contributor

A deep blue city in California is teeing up a tax on larger buildings that use natural gas after a federal court rejected the city’s attempt to ban gas hookups and stoves, according to The Daily Californian.

The city council of Berkeley, California, voted on July 30 to put an initiative on the upcoming ballot that would impose taxes on buildings that are 15,000 square feet or larger and use natural gas, according to The Daily Californian. In 2019, the city tried to enact an outright ban on constructing new buildings with natural gas hookups, and gas stoves by extension, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned the ban in April 2023 following a legal challenge against the policy brought by California Restaurant Association.

he official title for the ballot measure is the “Large Buildings Fossil Fuel Emissions Tax,” and it would affect more than 600 buildings in Berkeley if a simple majority of voters approve it at the ballot box, according to The Daily Californian. The measure’s proponents characterize it as an important step to fight climate change, but its opponents in the food service industry and beyond are concerned that the tax will place a steep burden on businesses and force commerce out of the city. (RELATED: ‘Makes No Sense’: Manchin Rips Biden Admin Over Gas Stoves, ‘Crazy’ ESG Investing)

“The gas equipment I purchased is intended to last decades. My intention in growing my business in Berkeley is to be here for decades,” Emily Winston, the owner of a Berkeley bagel shop called Boichik Bagels, wrote in a letter to the city council, per The Daily Californian. “But if I am going to be socked with a nearly half million dollar penalty every year, I will have to look seriously at moving out.”

Other organizations, including nonprofits, are also concerned about the possibility of a new tax imposing steep costs on their operations, according to The Daily Californian.

The David Brower Center— a nonprofit that works to advance the environmental movement — wrote to the city council to warn that the policy would create a “significant expense for the building, particularly considering that since the beginning of the pandemic, [it has] been running breakeven or at a loss,” according to The Daily Californian. The Berkeley Repertory Theater, a local performing arts venue, similarly wrote the city council to express its concern that “while we support electrification, this well-intentioned ballot measure with its immediate implementation would be very harmful to our struggling organization.”

Berkeley’s voters will also soon decide whether to adopt the so-called “Healthy New Buildings” ordinance, which would ban the sale and installation of appliances like gas stoves and furnaces that produce nitrogen oxides starting in 2027 if it is passed, according to The Daily Californian.

“I do not have a position on the initiative that qualified for the ballot. The Council was required to place this measure on the ballot once it was deemed to have received a sufficient number of valid signatures to do so. I am neither a proponent nor an opponent of this initiative,” Igor Tregub, who sits on Berkeley’s city council, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Over the course of several weeks, subsequent to the measure being certified for the ballot and my own election (which was certified around the same time), my office attempted to find common ground between the measures’ proponents and opponents so that a more balanced alternative measure could be crafted and placed on the ballot by an act of the City Council. Though a great deal of ground was covered in the direction of finding agreement between various stakeholders, we ultimately ran out of time before consensus could be reached.”

The Biden administration is also pursuing a broad building decarbonization agenda that favors the use of electricity for appliances and heating buildings instead of fossil fuels. The administration has barred the use of natural gas in new federal buildings starting in 2030, spent large sums of money to assist state and municipal governments in developing green building codes and defined zero emissions buildings as those that are “free of on-site emissions from energy use” and “powered solely from clean energy” in June.

Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) Commissioner Richard Trumka Jr. told Bloomberg News in January 2023 that “any option is on the table” with regard to a possible gas stove ban and that “products that can’t be made safe can be banned,” though the Department of Energy (DOE) contends that any suggestion that the government wants to ban gas stoves is “misinformation.”

Officials from the Biden Justice Department and DOE notably filed a June 2023 amicus brief with the Ninth Circuit asking the court to reverse its decision that overturned Berkeley’s 2019 gas hookups ban, but the court ruled in January that it would not be revisiting that decision.

“The City of Berkeley, whose natural gas ban was recently struck down by the 9th Circuit, now wants to try imposing a tax on facilities that use natural gas,” Steve Everley, a senior managing director at FTI Consulting, wrote in a Wednesday post to X, referencing The Daily Californian’s story. “But remember, no one is trying to ban gas stoves.”

Berkeley Mayor Jesse Arreguín and City Council Members Rashi Kesarwani, Terry Taplin, Ben Bartlett, Sophie Hahn, Susan Wengraf, Cecilia Lunaparra and Mark Humbert did not respond immediately to requests for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/Z9bWkPz

August 9, 2024 at 08:01AM

Yes, the Greenhouse Effect Is Like a Real Greenhouse (and other odds and ends)

As the result of complaints I’m getting regarding certain commenters here who can’t make a point without insulting others, I’ve been forced to read through hundreds of comments. I will probably be implementing one or more changes regarding commenting. More on that later…

I’m also seeing some recurring science talking points that are “incorrect” (as incorrect as can be in the realm of science). I’ve gotten where I’ll let bad science be expressed here if it’s done respectfully, and then let others attempt to correct it. But since not everyone can remember what I’ve blogged on in years past (even I can’t remember some of it), I thought it might be good to review some highlights. It might reduce confusion from some of our newer visitors about what *I* understand and promote from the science, rather than letting my allowing of opinions being expressed here being interpreted as some sort of endorsement of others’ ideas.

Yes, the Greenhouse Effect is like a Real Greenhouse

Most objections to using the greenhouse analogy is that the atmosphere does not have a “roof” preventing convective heat loss like a greenhouse does. But those who claim this don’t realize that the greenhouse effect (GHE) is defined with no convective heat transport. The GHE is like a real greenhouse with a perfect roof. The original paper on this is Manabe & Strickler (1964), where they calculated the average surface temperature in pure radiative equilibrium (the surface and each atmospheric layer achieving a temperature where rates of absorbed and emitted radiation are equal– no convection) was about 70 deg. C warmer than what is actually observed. The weaker “33 deg. C” effect you often see attributed to the GHE is actually the sum of [GHE warming + convective cooling]. It is NOT the extra warming from the GHE alone. So, yes, Virginia, Earth’s greenhouse effect is like a real greenhouse (even more so, because its “roof” is perfect, whereas a real greenhouse roof does lose some heat through conduction of heat through the roof and then convective air currents cooling the roof).

No, the Saturation Effect of Increasing CO2 on Global Temperatures is Not Being Ignored in Global Warming Projections

As CO2 increases in the atmosphere, the effect it has on the loss of IR energy to outer space becomes progressively less, producing a saturation effect. But this is true in all climate models as well, including the ones that produce unrealistic (5 deg. C or more) of warming from a doubling of atmospheric CO2. Thus, invoking the “saturation effect” as a magical talisman to refute CO2-induced warming will not work.

In fact, it is not possible for a planetary atmosphere to become totally opaque to IR radiation, because it would have to be fully, 100% saturated across all pressure-broadening affected wavelengths and through the entire depth of the atmosphere. Even Venus, with ~200,000 times as much CO2 as Earth’s atmosphere, is not “saturated” regarding the absorption of IR radiation.

The saturation talking point seems to have ramped up since publication of the recent theoretical line-by-line computations by my friend Will Happer & his co-author last year. But their calculations result in the same amount of radiative forcing from 2XCO2 as others have computed, and (again) are already included in even the most strongly warming climate models out there. Happer’s calculations might be the most complete and accurate to date (I don’t know), but their results do not change what is already in climate models in any significant way.

Yes, the Cold Atmosphere can Keep the Surface Warmer than if the GHE Did Not Exist

Just like adding insulation to the walls in your house in winter can increase the temperature inside (for the same amount of energy input from a furnace), the “cold” atmosphere helps keep the Earth’s surface warmer than if the radiative insulation it provides did not exist. As I’ve stated before, just take a $50 handheld IR thermometer and point it upward in a clear sky, and see how the indicated temperature warms as you point the thermometer obliquely, away from the zenith. That is the GHE acting on the thermopile within the thermometer, raising its temperature because more IR radiation from the sky occurs from the oblique angle than from pointing it straight up…. even though the atmosphere up there is colder than the interior of the thermometer.

A recent experiment posted at Watts Up With That shows how a cooler object can make a warm object even warmer. Over 10 years ago I used a different experimental setup to demonstrate the same thing.

Now, regarding commenting here… To begin with, I think I will spend a couple of hours computing how many of the frequent commenters’ comments here include insults. Would everyone like to see those statistics? Should we consider an award for the person who has the highest percentage of insults?

As you can tell, Dr. Roy is grumpy this morning.

Now, get off my lawn.

via Roy Spencer, PhD.

https://ift.tt/arOovuG

August 9, 2024 at 05:38AM

What The Met Office Did Not Tell You About Extreme Temperatures

By Paul Homewood

 

 

 image

Climate change is causing a dramatic increase in the frequency of temperature extremes and number of temperature records the UK experiences.

New analysis of observations shows that extremes of temperature in the UK are most affected by human induced climate change. This means the UK is seeing, on average, more frequent periods of hot weather, bringing challenges for infrastructure, health and wellbeing.

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/news-and-media/media-centre/weather-and-climate-news/2024/temperature-extremes-and-records-most-affected-by-uks-changing-climate

 

Remember the Met Office’s recent claim that we seeing a dramatic increase in the frequency of temperature extremes?

As I pointed out at the time, while we might be experiencing an increasing number of hot days, we are also having fewer extreme cold days. The Met Office’s claim is therefore simply not true.

I have now had a chance to do a full analysis, which will be included in my GWPF State of the Climate report due out shortly.

I have taken the CET daily mean temperature data since 1961, and extracted the coldest and hottest 5% – ie days below the 5th percentile and above the 95th percentile.

As suspected, there has been an increase in the number of the hottest days, though interestingly, apart from 2018, years such as 1975, 1976, 1995 and 2006 were at similar levels to recent years. The last decade does not appear to be much different to the 1990s and 2000s, suggesting we won’t see any further significant increase. Ultimately hot days are the result of anti-cyclonic weather, and the UK’s variable, temperate climate tends to mitigate against summer long heatwaves.

But as well getting more hot days, we are also seeing a drastic reduction in the number of extreme cold days:

image

 image

.

When we combine hot and cold together, there is no trend at all, either up or down:

image

 

The most extreme years were 1963, 1976, 1983, 1995, 2010 and 2018.

This analysis was easy to do, so why did the Met Office do something similar in their State of the UK Climate Report this year?

Instead they chose to deliberately deceive the public into believing that UK weather is becoming more extreme.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/fDh47m6

August 9, 2024 at 04:59AM

National Trust’s Garden of the Future

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

h/t Ian Magness

The woke NT are at it again!

A Mediterranean garden stocked with hardier plants designed to survive hotter summers and wetter winters has been unveiled at a National Trust property in Yorkshire.

The new garden at the stately home Beningbrough Hall, near York, features more than 4,000 perennials, grasses, trees and shrubs from the Mediterranean and areas around the world with a similar climate.

The plants in the garden, hailing from places as far afield as South Africa, South Korea, Chile, China and Australia, were selected by award-winning designer Andy Sturgeon for their ability to cope better with hotter, drier summers and wetter winters.

The National Trust said extremes in local weather over the past year have underlined the need to adapt Beningbrough’s garden.

Andy Jasper, the charity’s head of gardens and parklands, said it hoped visitors would enjoy the garden but also “be inspired to future-proof their own gardens”.

“With more intense weather events, including drought and floods, predicted, our gardens need to change to better tolerate extremes,” he said.

Progress to deliver the Mediterranean garden has been held up by the very wet weather in the past year, with rain “almost every day” – an irony which the garden team said was not lost on them.

Created out of an underused grassed area framed by red brick walls, the Mediterranean display has a series of long masonry dividing sections made from local York stone, together with boulders and water bowls featuring miniature lilies

A large tank has been built under the garden to capture excess rainfall and slowly release it to prevent flash flooding, while a rill flowing into a new pond draws on archive photographs and archaeological research showing the likely presence of a series of ponds and a fountain in this area around 1900.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/08/05/historic-yorkshire-hall-garden-future-surviving-uk-climate

We were promised Mediterranean summers decades ago. And we’re still waiting.

I often cycle around Beningbrough, which is near York, and stop off for a slice of cake! I can assure you that the gardens there are doing just fine.

In fact I was on my bike near Thirsk last week, but apparently missed the climate crisis!

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/9dJkVpL

August 9, 2024 at 04:06AM