Month: August 2024

Germany Just Cancelled Ukraine – Was Dependence on Russian Gas the Reason?

Essay by Eric Worrall

Germany has been accused of importing Russian Gas via third parties. Did Moscow just lay down some ground rules?

This article is speculative, but hear me out.

Germany relies on a new source of money for Kiev

Status: 08/17/2024 8:11 pm

In view of tight funds, the Federal Government no longer wants to provide Ukraine with new aid for the time being. However, according to the Ministry of Finance, exceptions are possible. Support for Kiev is to come from another source in the future.

By Christina Nagel, ARD capital studio

The Federal Government had planned around eight billion euros this year to support Ukraine. Already at the beginning of July, however, it became clear that the funds for military aid were running out. They were “largely spent and bound,” said Defense Minister Boris Pistorius in the run-up to the NATO summit.

So if Ukraine would request more ammunition, spare parts or military equipment this year, for example, then the federal government would have to say “no.” And hope that another country will jump into the breach.

Read more (Original German): https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/ukraine-hilfe-deutschland-102.html

Germany officially stopped Russian gas imports in 2022. But there is evidence a significant amount of Russian gas is still being imported by the EU in disguised form – the gas is being liquified, then allegedly sold via gas exporting third parties like Qatar.

War in Ukraine: Why is the EU still buying Russian gas?

Arthur Sullivan 04/29/2024April 29, 2024

Although the EU has dramatically reduced the amount of Russian gas it imports, significant quantities are still flowing into the bloc.

How LNG imports from Russia replaced pipeline gas

According to EU data, the share of Russian pipeline gas member states imported fell from 40% of the total in 2021 to about 8% in 2023. However, when Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) is included —  natural gas cooled down to liquid form so it can be transported by ship —  the total share of Russian gas in the EU’s total last year was 15%.

A key way the EU reduced its reliance on Russian gas was by increasing LNG imports from countries such as the United States and Qatar. However, this has inadvertently led to a surge of heavily discounted Russian LNG entering the bloc.

According to the data provider Kpler, Russia is now the EU’s second-biggest LNG supplier. LNG imports from Russia accounted for 16% of the EU’s total LNG supply in 2023, a 40% increase compared with the amount Russia sold to the EU in 2021.

Read more: https://www.dw.com/en/war-in-ukraine-why-is-the-eu-still-buying-russian-gas/a-68925869

Why is continued Russian involvement in German energy supplies important?

Germany is in a heap of trouble with its budget, the hundreds of billions of Euros Germany spent and continues to spend on its failed Energiewende green energy project have thrown government finances into chaos, and led to unpopular public deficits. Germany’s incompetent green politicians are terrified that any rise in economic hardship or further public outrage at the nation’s precarious finances will spur the rise of the populist right wing Alternative for Germany movement.

It wouldn’t take much of a disruption to German energy supplies to topple this fragile budget situation. Even a few delayed shipments of that thinly disguised Russian gas could trigger another politically damaging German energy price spike, and push German public finances even deeper into the red.

There is a missing link in this chain, I don’t have evidence that Moscow recently stepped up pressure on Germany to stop supporting Ukraine. But the timing of this decision to stop supporting Ukraine, right in the middle of a German budget crisis, within days of Ukraine’s surprise salient into Russian territory, seems intriguing.

Germany’s withdrawal of open ended support for Ukraine creates a huge risk for the United States. If the rest of Europe follows Germany’s lead, and also starts pulling support for Ukraine, the Biden / Harris administration will be left with the embarrassment of supporting a war on another continent which even Ukraine’s neighbours don’t care about. The “hope that another country will jump into the breach” – I wonder which other country German officials have in mind? With the tattered veil of European military support ripped aside, the Ukraine war would openly become a direct military confrontation between the USA’s Ukrainian proxy and the nuclear armed Russian Federation.

If I am right, Europe is truly paying the price for their failed experiment in green energy. European governments are still so beholden to Russian energy supplies, they have to dance like performing bears whenever Moscow cracks its whip, even as Russia eats one of their neighbours. Yet with their very political survival being threatened, most European politicians still haven’t found the political courage to change course and admit their green energy push was a mistake.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/K4cNo8P

August 18, 2024 at 12:02PM

Chair of Nuclear for Australia denies that calling CO2 ‘plant food’ means he’s a climate denier (whatever that is)


Is there anyone who thinks ‘climate’ has no meaning, or doesn’t exist? The whole topic seems stuck in a primitive mode sometimes, or maybe most of the time. It doesn’t take much to trigger outpourings of paranoia, which the alarmist tendency in the media is quick to pounce on.
– – –
The chair of a leading Australian nuclear advocacy group has called concerns that carbon dioxide emissions are driving a climate crisis an “irrational fear of a trace gas which is plant food” and has rejected links between worsening extreme weather and global heating, reports The Guardian.

Several statements from Dr Adi Paterson, reviewed by the Guardian, appear at odds with statements from the group he chairs, Nuclear for Australia, which is hosting a petition saying nuclear is needed to tackle an “energy and climate crisis”.

Nuclear for Australia was founded by 18-year-old Queensland nuclear advocate Will Shackel, who has said repeatedly he believes reactors are needed to fight “the climate crisis”.

Two climate science experts told the Guardian that Paterson’s statements were misguided and typical of climate science denial.

Paterson defended his statements, telling the Guardian he was “not a climate denier”. He described himself as “a climate realist” and an “expert on climate science”.
. . .
In April, Paterson told an audience at the Centre for Independent Studies that “you can’t make a correlation between extreme events and climate” and said “no matter what you believe about carbon dioxide – it is plant food”.

“Increasing carbon a little bit is not going to dramatically change the climate. The plants will grow better,” he said, saying the planet was in a period of low CO2.

Full report here.
– – –
Image credit: nuclearenergytech.net

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/M58CSTd

August 18, 2024 at 11:32AM

GFS Expects Global Temperature To Drop To Lowest Level Of The Year

The GFS anticipates a temperature drop in the southern hemisphere (below, blue line), which will also cause global 2m temperatures (black line) to fall to a new low for the year.

Hat-tip: Snowfan here.

The anomalies refer to the outdated (colder) WMO climate mean 1981-2010 and were also “adjusted” with the warming GISS factor: They are significantly colder in reality.

Source: GFS forecast global 2m-temperatures, with notations added by Snowfan.

Donate – choose an amount

via NoTricksZone

https://ift.tt/QtigWjM

August 18, 2024 at 11:07AM

Hottest Day This Year

By Paul Homewood

 

It’s a week old, but I thought it worth dealing with one particular claim by the Met Office, now I am back from Darkest Devon!

 

 

 

 

 image

Monday has been declared the hottest day of the year in the UK so far, reaching 34.8C (95F) in Cambridge, according to the Met Office.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3rdwx4yx12o

The BBC notes:

This is only the eleventh year since 1961 that temperatures as high as 34.8C have been recorded, according to the Met Office’s provisional figures.

Six of those occasions have been in the last 10 years, the forecaster added.

Many extreme weather events – including heatwaves – are becoming more frequent and intense as a result of climate change, experts say.

Let’s leave aside the fact that there is no mention of fewer cold waves; or the fact there is no evidence of “many other extreme weather events becoming more frequent. This is sadly the usual mendacious reporting we regularly see from the BBC.

But what about the claim that 34.8C has been recorded more regularly in recent years? As we know, we usually only find these high temperatures at dodgy sites – whether Junk Class 5 stations, next to the runway at Heathrow or in the middle of large conurbations.

The Met Office stats might be more credible if they only used pristine Class 1 stations.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/KvabPRf

August 18, 2024 at 11:03AM