Month: September 2024

AR6 Results

By Paul Homewood

 

London: 3 September 2024
Rising prices for offshore wind warn of the mounting cost of Net Zero
  • The price for new electricity from offshore wind has risen to £82/MWh in current prices, a significant 58% increase since the previous successful auction.

  • Higher prices will lead directly to higher household bills and the results raise the already astronomical price tag of meeting Miliband’s unrealistic target to decarbonise the power grid by 2030.

  • A loophole in Government contracts could cost households up to £180m a year.

Results for the latest auction (AR6) for renewable energy subsidies, known as Contracts for Difference (CfDs), were released this morning. The auction was the first since the humiliating 5th allocation round (AR5) in which there were no bids for new offshore wind capacity. The Government has secured 3.4GW of new offshore wind capacity by awarding a large increase in price to the technology that it regards as the cornerstone of its energy plans.

The auction had an increased budget of £1.555 billion, having been increased by Miliband. It is the largest CfD auction to date and will therefore lock in far more capacity at higher prices than the previous auction.

Flexibilities in the contracts drawn up by Government officials meant that older wind farm projects could withdraw up to 25% of contracted capacity and re-enter it into this year’s auction, allowing them to take advantage of the higher prices on offer. 1.6 GW of successful bids came from such projects – a loophole that may cost households as much as £180m each year. It’s another slip up for a Department that already allowed just one windfarm to net £647 million from delaying the start of its CfD contract.

Before the election, forecasts produced by Aurora Energy Research found that Labour’s 2030 target to decarbonise the power grid was “unfeasible”, but even these forecasts used over-optimistic numbers for renewable energy costs. These new results show costs to be rising rather than falling, vindicating warnings made repeatedly by Net Zero Watch. If Miliband’s Net Zero plans could once be regarded as unfeasible, they must surely now be seen as ruinous.

Net Zero Watch director, Andrew Montford, said:

“How many times were we subjected to the chorus of ‘wind is cheap’? That refrain now rings hollow and these results show Miliband’s green utopianism to be even more costly and impractical than once feared.”

.

NZW mention this new loophole, which allows wind farms to withdraw capacity already contracted for, and add it back into AR6 at a higher price:

image

https://www.osborneclarke.com/insights/spring-budget-2024-unprecedented-boost-uk-offshore-wind-sector

 

The idea that a contractor can tear up his contract, in order to bid again at a higher price is repugnant. Presumably there was a fear that they simply would pull out of uneconomic contracts anyway.

In AR6, four projects, with a combined capacity of 498MW, have taken advantage of this loophole – Inch Cape, Moray West, Hornsea Three and EA3. All had signed contracts at £47.30/MWh (2012 prices), and instead will now get £54.23. Miliband’s largesse will cost billpayers around £800 million over the period of the contract. About two thirds will go to Danish owned Orsted, who are building Hornsea.

Although the new strike prices are lower than the ASP ceiling prices set, they are still much higher than market prices. Offshore wind, for instance, will cost £82/MWh at current prices. So far this financial year, market prices, as calculated by the LCCC for payment of CfD subsidies, have averaged £58/MWh. This implies an annual subsidy of £288 million.

image

It is also worth noting that, apart from Inch Cape and co, there were only two successful bidders – Hornsea Four and East Anglia Two. Obviously both of these projects can use much of the infrastructure already in place, thus saving money.

It is also relevant that about 6GW of offshore capacity was unsuccessful in the auction. We are not told what prices they offered, but this is an indication that AR7 will see much higher strike prices.

Meanwhile Miliband’s vision of quadrupling offshore wind capacity to 70GW by 2030 is more of a pipe dream than ever. We currently have about 30GW of existing or contracted offshore projects, and this new tranche of 3GW will not even start operations before 2029.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/FNjnEOd

September 3, 2024 at 08:39AM

Epic Fail: ‘There is NO progress on climate’ – U.S. still consumes 82% of our energy from fossil fuels in 2023 – despite hundreds of billions spent by Biden-Harris – In 2023 world burned more fossil fuels than at any other time in history’

From CLIMATE DEPOT

Marc Morano

Via the Committee to Unleash Prosperity: Kamala Explains Fracking Flip Flop

There is NO “progress on climate.” Today we get more than 80% of our energy from fossil fuels – which is about exactly where we were five years ago – despite the hundreds of billions spent. …

In 2023 the world burned more fossil fuels than at any other time in history. Here are the facts:

Global energy-related CO2 emissions increased by 1.7%, driven by China and India.

Fossil fuel consumption in 2023 reached a record high, rising by 1.5% to 505 exajoules.

China is by far the world’s largest consumer of primary energy, burning 34% of world consumption 170.7.

Almost no country is meeting their UN anti-fossil fuel targets.

https://committeetounleashprosperity.com/hotlines/kamala-explains-fracking-flip-flop/embed/#?secret=wlJb2uf0Po#?secret=aNqCjKyJvk

Via the Committee to Unleash Prosperity: Kamala Explains Fracking Flip Flop

It’s entertaining to watch liberal operatives explain why Kamala is suddenly retreating from her radical positions on everything from the border wall, to the Green New Deal, to reparations, to fracking, to taxing unrealized capital gains, to Medicare for all, et al.

She says even though her positions shift with the political winds, “my values haven’t changed.”

But her campaign’s explanation below for why she is now FOR fracking is a non sequitur.

As we’ve noted many times on these pages, there is NO “progress on climate.” Today we get more than 80% of our energy from fossil fuels – which is about exactly where we were five years ago – despite the hundreds of billions spent.

As for Kamala’s statement that other nations are reaching their climate targets, that’s a myth too. Actually, in 2023 the world burned more fossil fuels than at any other time in history. Here are the facts:

    • Global energy-related CO2 emissions increased by 1.7%, driven by China and India.
    • Fossil fuel consumption in 2023 reached a record high, rising by 1.5% to 505 exajoules.
    • China is by far the world’s largest consumer of primary energy, burning 34% of world consumption 170.7.
    • Almost no country is meeting their UN anti-fossil fuel targets.

#

Related: 

Solar & Wind made up just 13.9% of the world’s electricity in 2023 – Despite trillions in subsidies, mandates, UN climate summits, net zero & restrictions on fossil fuels

Despite the mandates, subsidies & regs — solar & wind generate only 14% of U.S. electricity in 2022

Study in journal Science: Only 63 of 1,500 Global Climate Policies of Past 25 Years Worked to Reduce CO2 Emissions – A success rate of 4.2% – Study author: ‘We find that it’s very rare that [subsidies and regulations] really work in reducing emissions.’

Devastating testimony against solar, wind & EVs: ‘Colossal amount of energy & resources’ necessary to run ‘so-called green’ solutions

July 18, 2024

“These so-called green or ethical solutions aren’t solutions at all. Just very good marketing from the $1.5 trillion a year climate change industry.” A whole heap of inconvenient truths on the corporatist transfer of wealth of net zero. pic.twitter.com/Jr6fy2AY3X — James Melville (@JamesMelville) July 16, 2024 Rachel Mathews:

USA produces mostly fossil fuel energy, 84% – Solar & wind make up just 2.2% of all energy – Over the past decade, solar & wind increased total energy production by 2.1% compared to fossil fuels increase at 27.9% – July 15, 2024

Bjorn Lomborg: ” The US produces mostly fossil fuel energy (84%). Solar and wind make up just 2.2% of all energy (not just electricity). Over the past decade, solar and wind increased total energy production by 2.1%. Fossil fuels increased energy production by 27.9%.

The US is mostly run on fossil fuels, also in 2023. 82% of all energy (not just electricity) consumed comes from coal, oil and gas. Nuclear is 9%, renewables (mostly biomass) is 9%. Solar and wind contributes 2.5%.

The US, has since 2019, produced more energy than it consumes. And it has never been more energy-independent since WWII. Last time of small energy surpluses was 1957.”

Watch: ‘Juice’ debunks claims that solar & wind power as ‘green’: To make one wind turbine, ‘we have to extract 900 tons of steel, 2,500 tons of concrete, & 45 tons of non-renewable plastic’

March 5, 2024

Juice: Why Wind and Solar Make Our Power Grid Less Reliable: Excerpt: “Just to produce one turbine, we have to extract 900 tons of steel, 2,500 tons of concrete, and 45 tons of non-renewable plastic. Then we’ve got to transport that and burn fuel, getting it all carried across the world and put up. And none of these things that go into a turbine are renewable.”

Energy analyst Mark P. Mills exposes folly of EVs being ‘Net-Zero’: ‘You have to dig up about 500,000 pounds of materials to make a single 1000-pound battery’

Mandating EVs in U.S. would require ’18 times current global production of cobalt…three quarters of lithium & half the world’s copper & rare earths. China dominates all these markets’

Wind Turbine Collapses: ‘Leaking Oil Everywhere!’ – ‘Wait, these ‘green’ wind turbines use oil???’ – Yes, avg of 12,000 gallons of oil for typical wind farm

‘Coal is now world’s top energy source’ – Coal, no longer shunned, keeps Europe’s lights on

Black Rock’s Larry Fink Admits Green Energy IS A FRAUD! – At the WEF, Larry Fink ironically destroys net-zero when it comes to the power needed for AI: “By 2030 [data centers] need 30 gigawatts.. Where’s that power gonna come from? To power these data companies you can’t have intermittent power like wind & solar”

Wash Post admits reality: ‘Amid explosive demand, America is running out of power’ – U.S. ‘power grid’ being pushed ‘to the brink. Utilities can’t keep up’ – ‘It is staggering’ – But WaPo frets energy shortage ‘threatens to stifle the transition to cleaner energy’

AI = Energy Detransition: Energy analyst Mark P. Mills Testifies to Congress on how massive electricity demand for AI means ‘policymakers can no longer entertain the idea of an ‘energy transition’

WaPo: Top six states with ‘clean energy’ are powered primarily by nuclear or hydropower — Not solar or wind. – USA’s huge drop in CO2 emissions due to natural gas replacing coal

Report says the quiet part out loud: ‘Heavy industry’ (iron, steel, cement) will have to ‘adapt’ to intermittent solar/wind energy – ‘Will need to accommodate effects of weather conditions…time of day on wind & solar power generation’

You Will Build Nothing & Be Happy: UN report urges ‘massive emission cuts in construction sector’ by using ‘gov’t regs & enforcement’ to achieve ‘Net Zero’ – Replace ‘concrete & steel’ with ‘stone, timber, & bamboo’

Flashback 2011: ‘Era of Constant Electricity at Home is Ending, says UK power chief’ — ‘Families would have to get used to only using power when it was available’

Bloomberg News: ‘South Africa Beats Climate Goal as Blackouts Slash Emissions’ – ‘Unintentional…power plant breakdowns are reducing industrial activity’

LA Times says quiet part out loud: ‘Would an occasional blackout help solve climate change?’ – ‘We might not have a choice’

Energy crisis solved!? ‘Poor families (w/ smart meters) will be paid not to use electricity at certain times’ to reduce risk of blackouts

#

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/ShAPouH

September 3, 2024 at 08:07AM

Exposed: August 2024 cooler than August 1983 in the US

Related links: Milloy X post

via JunkScience.com

https://ift.tt/zBjCYH4

September 3, 2024 at 07:08AM

What Happened To Your “Wettest Summer”, Met Office?

By Paul Homewood

 

Talking of clowns, maybe Nick Ferrari will treat anything the Met Office with a large pinch of salt in future!

 

 

 

 https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-165.png

Forecasters are predicting a summer of persistent rain and wet weather for Brits, as global warming continues to result in more erratic conditions.

The Met Office has briefed the Government and transport chiefs to prepare for at least 50 days of rain in the next three months, leading to fears over further flooding in the UK and dashing any hopes of a warm British summer.

Last summer saw 40 days of rain, but the Met Office expects this summer to be even worse, jeopardising popular summer events such as Wimbledon, Trooping of the Colour, Royal Ascot and many festivals including Glastonbury.

To count as a rainy day, there must be a minimum of 2.5mm of rain in a 24 hour period.

The UK’s wettest ever summer in 1912 saw rainfall on more than 55 days.

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/uk-set-for-50-days-of-rain-in-one-of-the-wettest-summers-in-over-a-hundred-years/

.

In the event the summer was drier than average:

As I noted at the time, the Met Office’s warning did not even tally with their own 3-Month Outlook, and was clearly designed as pure spin intended to scare the public.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/Z3IcC6l

September 3, 2024 at 06:22AM