Month: September 2024

FRIDAY FUNNY: Escape from Houston – Autonomous Chaos Edition

From the University of Texas at Austin and the “What could possibly go wrong?” department comes this inanity that reminds me of how well the evacuation of New Orleans went in 2005 with Hurricane Katrina. I’m amazed anyone actually spent any time and money on this. Thanks to Charles for the graphic depicting my vision of the process. – Anthony


Escape from hurricanes with driverless cars

Supercomputers aid simulations to help carless populations in Houston evacuation scenario

When a hurricane strikes, the most vulnerable are not always able to get out in time. UT Austin scientists are using supercomputers at the Texas Advanced Computing (TACC) to study how shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) can get people who do not have their own car into shelters out of harm’s way.

“A key finding of our study is that if you need to size this system for a certain evacuation period, then you’re going to want one shared vehicle for every 14 evacuees along the very long coastline between Galveston and Houston,” said Kara Kockelman, a professor of transportation engineering in the Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering at UT Austin. She co-authored the study, published in the journal Transportation Planning and Technology (June 2024). 

The idea is to use shared autonomous vehicles, akin to the robotaxis of companies like Cruise and Waymo, to bring carless populations to bus stations that can then transport them to hurricane shelters further inland of Houston. 

“That can be difficult to do in these low density, more rural environments to do in less than a couple of hours,” Kockelman added. The areas at high risk for evacuation include Brazoria, Chambers, Galveston, Harris, and Liberty counties. The study focuses on the thousands of people who can be stranded, such as those listed in Medicare databases who don’t have cars or access to a ride.

An estimated 900,000 people will receive orders to evacuate when a Category 5 hurricane strikes—about 12.4 percent of the Houston area’s total population. The engineers estimated that the background traffic is about 50 percent of the normal traffic load. The rest of the population is assumed to remain in place. 

The evacuees will travel across Houston’s complex network of roads; 36,124 links spread across 5,217 areas, known as traffic analysis zones. Out of these, 1,035 zones are in areas highly likely to be hit by strong hurricanes.

Evacuation map of Houston, TX. The utilized network, with at-risk TAZs marked in yellow to red and the recommended evacuation route defined by the local metropolitan planning organization (MPO). Credit: DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2024.2360678.

Kockelman was awarded allocations for her traffic simulations with SAVs on TACC’s Frontera supercomputer, the fastest supercomputer on a U.S. university campus and funded by the National Science Foundation.

“This work is impossible without supercomputers,” added Kockelman. “We’re tracking individual persons and individual vehicles every few seconds over 24 hours or days of actual traffic as it evolves from morning to evening and overnight.”

The traffic decisions in the simulations account for how bad traffic is, picking the best routes, and prioritizing pick-ups to minimize the time that it takes to clear evacuees.

The engineers used the (SUMO) Simulation of Urban Mobility traffic simulation software to assess traffic congestion and network capacities. They modeled pre-disaster evacuation scenarios with a lead time of several days before hurricane landfall. 

“SUMO models the daily activities of everyone living in the region,” said Kentaro Mori, a UT Austin PhD student supervised by Kockelman. “There’s a lot of complexity that adds to the computational cost. Without TACC, we wouldn’t be able to run the many scenarios that we need to truly answer these important research questions and make the best policy recommendations.”

The team started the simulations with 200 robotaxis expanding out to 1,200—they also tried different sized cars.

“At the end of the day the 5-seater cars were the nimblest,” Kockelman said. “These vehicles accelerate more quickly into traffic compared to the larger vehicles.” What’s more, the simulations showed diminishing returns on a fleet larger than 200. 

This study was a pioneering effort that provides suggestive data of a viable alternative mode of transportation for hurricane evacuees without access to private vehicles. While the results are not being directly used for hurricane applications yet, the engineers did consult with evacuation leaders for Texas in forming the study. The authors anticipate SAVs playing a bigger role in evacuations, as companies like Waymo broaden their ridership; and operations make improvements through methods such as smart repositioning of idle vehicles, optimal dynamic ride sharing matching, enhanced path finding algorithms, and more.

Kockelman added that the traffic simulations could apply to other cities and different disaster evacuation scenarios, such as wildfires on the west coast.

 “The ability to simulate in detail and allow for uncertainty and heterogeneity in the population was never feasible before with the way people make decisions or how traffic unfolds second-by-second level,” Kockelman said. “That richness comes alive with the use of TACC systems. We’re fortunate that we’re here at UT Austin and able to harness that ability.”


The study, “Leveraging shared autonomous vehicles for vulnerable populations during pre-disaster evacuation,” was published June 2024 in the journal Transportation Planning and Technology. The study authors are Jooyong Lee of the Department of Urban & Transportation Engineering, Kyonggi University, Suwon, South Korea; and Kara M. Kockelman of Transportation Engineering, Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin. 

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/s9jFf47

September 13, 2024 at 12:07PM

BBC Uphold Battery Storage Complaint

By Paul Homewood

 

 

This article from August 2023 exemplifies just how poor the BBC’s journalism has become regarding climate and energy:

 

 

 image

Huge battery storage plants could soon become a familiar sight across the UK, with hundreds of applications currently lodged with councils.

In one corner of West Yorkshire locals are fighting plans to site two facilities within a mile of their homes.

They cite concerns over the safety and environmental impact of the technology but the firms behind them say the processes are safe.

BBC Yorkshire spoke to those on both sides of the highly charged debate.

What are battery storage plants?

In short, battery storage plants, or battery energy storage systems (BESS), are a way to stockpile energy from renewable sources and release it when needed.

When the wind blows and the sun shines turbines and solar panels may generate more energy than needed on a particular day.

That excess electricity is then stored as chemical energy, usually inside Lithium-ion batteries, so when conditions are calm and overcast it can be sent back into the power grid.

National Grid says part of its job is to manage those fluctuations and match supply with demand, but said it can become more challenging when the target is to achieve net zero carbon production.

"Fossil-fuel fired plants have traditionally been used to manage these peaks and troughs, but battery energy storage facilities can replace a portion of these so-called peaking power generators over time," a spokesperson said.

As more power comes from wind and solar, the need for these batteries and similar storage sites is expected to grow.

"At the moment we have a total installed capacity in the UK of about 77gW, of which only 24gW is renewable," said Prathivadi Anand from the University of Bradford.

Dr Anand, a professor of public policy and sustainability, continued: "The more we rely on renewables, we need something to balance it, because the wind is not always blowing and the sun is not always shining."

https://web.archive.org/web/20230930183534/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-66584335

One of our readers submitted this complaint to the BBC:

 

“As more power comes from wind and solar, the need for these batteries and similar storage sites is expected to grow.”

Dr Anand is then quoted claiming:

"At the moment we have a total installed capacity in the UK of about 77gW, of which only 24gW is renewable”

1. The BBC should know that the initialised unit ‘giga’ prefix is capitalised i.e. ‘GW’. [Note: That correction was made in early Oct 2023]

2. Dr Anand’s quoted claim is both ambiguous AND inaccurate.

2.1 The article relates to battery *storage*, and Dr Anand specifically states “…the need for these batteries and similar *storage* sites is expected to grow.” A unit of energy storage capacity is GWh; a GW is a unit of power (discharge).

Yet his phrase  “… we have a total installed capacity in the UK of about 77gW (sic), of which only 24gW (sic) is renewable" refers to GW units.

2.2 The UK has neither 77GWh of grid electricity storage capacity nor 77GW of grid electricity power capacity, so his claim is factually incorrect.

2.3 His reference to “….about 77gW (sic), of which only 24gW (sic) is renewable" implies he’s now referring to generating, not storage, capacity.

2.4 According to Elexon BMRS’s website “Installed Generation Capacity Aggregated (B1410)” at 1/1/2023 Britain had 101.83GW of generating capacity which included 49.426GW of renewables generating capacity.

2.5 According to the late Prof Sir David MacKay Britain’s grid has 26.7GWh of pumped hydro storage capacity having a discharge power of 2.86GW.

We’ve less than 3GWh of grid battery storage capacity, so total grid electricity storage capacity is <30GWh.”

.

Nearly a year later the ECU has finally accepted the complaint:

 

image

image

https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/ecu/bess-the-charged-debate-over-battery-energy-storage-systems-bbccouk

What makes the original report so bad was that the comments came not from somebody like Justin Rowlatt, who has no idea what he is talking about, but  “a professor of public policy and sustainability” (whatever that is!)

That a “Professor” can come up with such gibberish is alarming.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/27cZt4n

September 13, 2024 at 12:04PM

Lowestoft project pioneers climate change technology

By Paul Homewood

 

h/t Joe Public/Dave Ward

 

 

 image

It is a mysterious-looking structure gradually taking shape in the Lowestoft skyline – prompting plenty of speculation about what it actually is.

And the truth is actually stranger than many of the suggestions.

For the peculiar, rocket-like tower nearing completion at the town’s port is actually one of the world’s first Direct Air Capture (DAC) facilities.

These devices use pioneering technology to extract carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere, allowing the greenhouse gas to be stored.

The one being built at Lowestoft is a pilot project involving a consortium led by Sizewell C and Associated British Ports, which was awarded £3m to construct the plant.

Once the plant is operational by the end of this year, the team say it will be capable of extracting 100 tonnes of CO2 from the atmosphere each year.

https://www.edp24.co.uk/news/24577876.lowestoft-project-pioneers-climate-change-technology/

 

Given that the UK emits 327m tonnes of CO2 every year, the 100 tonnes that will be extracted represents 10 seconds worth!

And the EDP do not tell us how much energy this plant will use.

And another £3 million down the drain.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/NCkIRaT

September 13, 2024 at 11:50AM

Saturday

0 out of 10 based on 0 rating

via JoNova

https://ift.tt/G7cuHAs

September 13, 2024 at 10:00AM