via STOP THESE THINGS

https://ift.tt/1igwxH3

July 19, 2025 at 07:57PM

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/dXQTw9v

July 19, 2025 at 04:03PM

The pretence that expensively imported biomass is a climate benefit becomes ever more hollow. No sooner do its ’emissions’ reach the atmosphere than politicians demand yet more expense on carbon capture. All paid for by onerous charges added to people’s power bills of course.
– – –
Drax power station has been crowned the UK’s ‘largest single source of carbon emissions’ yet again, with emissions rising 16% from last year, says E&T.

Located near Selby in North Yorkshire, Drax started life as a coal-fired power station when it was opened in 1974, but started co-firing biomass by 2010 in response to government concerns about the UK’s carbon emissions.

According to a report from think tank Ember, Drax has now been the UK’s top emitter for the last 10 years running. It was found to emit more than the next four largest polluters combined and more than the six most emitting gas power plants combined.

Its emissions are equivalent to over 10% of the UK’s total transport emissions and nearly 3% of the country’s territorial total.

The wood pellets burned by the power plant have an equivalent carbon intensity to coal – which is considered to be the most carbon-intensive fossil fuel – but are burned at higher volumes due to their low energy density, meaning that burning wood emits more CO2 than coal or gas per kWh of electricity.

The two fuels are not directly equivalent, however, as biomass is sometimes considered to be a climate-friendly fuel due to its renewable nature and the fact that the initial tree growth sequesters carbon from the atmosphere. On the downside, it takes up significant amounts of land to grow that could otherwise be used for food crops.

Also, while the crop itself sequesters carbon, this does not negate the emissions associated with their agricultural upkeep, such as fertilisers and chemicals or the carbon cost of harvesting, processing and transporting the fuel.

Despite its year-on-year emissions increase, Ember said that Drax received around £2m per day in subsidies in 2024 – an average of £10 per household. The power station burned 7.6 million tonnes of wood, 99% of which was imported.

Although subsidy cuts are expected to halve support from 2027, Drax is still projected to remain the UK’s biggest emitter until 2030.

“Imported biomass is not clean power – it’s the UK’s biggest single source of climate-damaging carbon emissions,” said Ember analyst Frankie Mayo. “Yet Drax continues to receive millions in public funds and is set to remain the UK’s top emitter through 2030.”
. . .
For the first time in decades, no coal power plant appeared on the list of top 25 largest emitters following the closure of Ratcliffe-on-Soar last year.

Full article here.
– – –
Image: Drax power station, Yorkshire

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/tz42n8H

July 19, 2025 at 01:34PM

Higher Than 1981!

An analysis of summer sea ice areas in the West Arctic including the NW Passage by the Canadian government ,shows that ice area levels remain above average.

Hat-tip: Snowfan

The Canadian Ice Service data show that the sea ice areas in the period from June 25 to July 16, 2025 continue to be above average (far right) and even larger than at the beginning of the measurements in 1981 (far left).

This year, for the period June 25 – July 16, the levels are the third highest in over 20 years. Data source: Canada Ice Service for sea ice areas in the Western Arctic.

via NoTricksZone

https://ift.tt/Gc9QbyP

July 19, 2025 at 12:28PM