Author: Iowa Climate Science Education

Rachel’s Black Hole

By Paul Homewood

bh-overlay-1

Rachel from Accounts has apparently discovered a black hole!

Well, Rachel, here are some suggestions to fill it!

  • Shut down DESNZ – Saving £14.0bn (incl Capital Spend) – the Department serves no useful purpose.
  • End subsidies for heat pumps – Saving £2.2bn, the potential cost if govt targets of 300,000 a year are met
  • Levelise car taxes for EVs – currently EV drivers do not pay fuel duty. Instead they should pay extra vehicle tax of £1000 – Saving £1.3bn
  • Abolish all climate aid – Saving £11.6bn over five years, or £2.3bn a year

TOTAL SAVING  – £19.8bn a year

All of these savings could be made with little more than a stroke of the pen. None would involve any changes to existing laws, or involve breach of contract.

And they would all have the benefit of fairness and equity. After all, why should some motorists subsidise others with EVs. Why should I subsidise my next-door neighbour’s heat pump?

Go on, Rachel! Make a name for yourself, before you get sucked into that black hole!

    via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

    https://ift.tt/sEcJZFU

    November 23, 2024 at 07:48AM

    Harris:Quidnish DCNN 0411 – Incorrect Classification.

    57.78007 -6.89739 Met Office CIMO Assessed Class 3 Installed 1/9/1997

    Obviously being a northern and westerly location in the Outer Hebrides (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) stations like this are critically important for weather prediction. By the same token the local climate is significantly different here even to places on the same latitude over on the east coast of Scotland such as Banff. The issue with this site is that its readings are added to the national climate record from a very improperly sited station with an even stranger quality assessment.

    Harris:Quidnish is a regular regional star performer in the “Climate Extremes” league tables both regionally and even occasionally nationally. This national rating in winter months when easterly continental winds prevail is not surprising, these Isles are often very mild when the rest of the UK is very cold. The most recent appearance was yesterday when notably east coast Scotland temperatures were not much above freezing and the UK highest was equally westerly at only 9.9°C on the Isles of Scilly.

    So what is the problem with Quidnish? The below image is orientated with the house to the north.

    Basically this screen has been installed under a metre from a south facing wall (albeit a natural formation) on a significantly sloping site. Another perspective indicates it must be quite a squeeze to get around the front to open the northwards facing door that screens must have. This is an automatic site but still requires regular inspection.

    And why must screen doors be on the north face? So as not to have undue warming effects when opened to take readings or make inspections from thermometers facing that direction. In this case the instruments are continually picking up on the south facing wall’s inevitable effects and hence clearly inaccurate at times. However, that has not stopped the Met Office from assessing this site as CIMO class 3 and by their own standards (Excellent, Good, Satisfactory & Unsatisfactory) this is classed as the second best (a minority high grade) of “Good”.

    A reminder of what the Met Office say about weather station siting:

    Very clearly this falls into the “Undesirable site” qualification. What do the WMO standards require for Class 3?

    How can this site possibly meet “At more than 10 m from artificial heat sources and reflective surfaces (buildings, concrete surfaces, car parks, etc.); Or is it a case that rock formations do not count as they are neither “concrete” surfaces nor artificial? Surely the “etc” covers rock outcrops under 1 metre away.

    The Class 3 and “Good” classifications for this site are clearly not appropriate. Again this may seem I am being pernickety but clearly there was no shortage of space in the immediate vicinity to have installed the screen both further away from rock formations and on more level ground. My personal view is that it is not appropriate to include this site’s readings in the historic temperature record. I welcome any views on this.

    via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

    https://ift.tt/HPf1iMg

    November 23, 2024 at 06:47AM

    Wind Speeds Dropping, Rainfall Similar to a Century Ago – the Climate News You Won’t Hear in the Mainstream

    From THE DAILY SCEPTIC

    by Chris Morrison

    Back to Biblical times and beyond, great floods and storms were the promised punishments for those who sinned against the fashionable orthodoxies and beliefs. It is of course a natural go-to for modern day prophets of climate doom. Needless to say, inconvenient scientific facts are unwelcome in the Latter Day Church of Net Zero, so alarmists are cautioned to stop reading here. The rest of us can digest recent research by Paul Homewood on the British climate in 2023 and published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation. This notes that sea level rises are showing no acceleration over multi-decadal scales and rainfall is not becoming more extreme, while storms have become less powerful over recent years.

    It has become slightly warmer than it used to be, notes Homewood, “but the U.K. climate has changed very little in recent years”. Long-term trends are dwarfed by the natural variability of British weather, he continues, and there is no evidence that weather is becoming more extreme. “Nothing in the data indicates that climate will become more extreme in future,” he concludes.

    Homewood observes that sea levels have been rising at between 1.3mm and 2mm a year around the U.K. after taking into account vertical land movement, and there has been no acceleration in the rate of rise on multi-decadal scales. But sea level rises are an easy hit for climate alarmists promoting the Net Zero political fantasy. Residents of Gloucester were alarmed in 2022 by local newspaper reports that their Cathedral, set at 19 metres above sea level, would be flooded by 2050. In the same year, the Mirror added to the gaiety of the nation with a story stating that large parts of the Midlands would be under water. Coastal towns in Hampshire, Essex, Sussex and Kent were at serious risk, it was claimed. Belgium, Germany, Northern France and half of the Netherlands “are expected to be under water by 2100”.

    All of this is the work of Climate Central, a Green Blob-funded operation that specialises in ready-to-publish stories for particularly dozy journalists. In its own words, it “provides authoritative information to help the public and policymakers make sound decisions about climate and energy”. Apart from flooding laughs, it seems we have Climate Central to thank for the establishment in the U.K. of World Weather Attribution. It claims to have “initiated conversations with leading researchers and key journalists about bringing attribution science into the news cycle”. Rarely can Green Blob money have been better spent. The pseudoscience of attributing individual weather events to human-caused climate change is well established with “key journalists” ready to peddle all the unprovable claims under the covering banner of ‘scientists say’.

    Meanwhile back in the real world it is not apparent that rising sea levels in the U.K. and elsewhere – relatively tiny compared to those just 4,000 years ago – present much danger in the near future. Many Pacific island are growing in size due to natural accretion, while a recently published science paper has published the startling news that low-lying Bangladesh has grown in size over the last 34 years by 3,274 km2 to reach 137,656 km2. Bangladesh and its position on the Bay of Bengal has long been a poster alarm for coastal flooding and population displacement. However, the vast majority of the recent land expansion is shown to have been the consequence of receding relative sea levels along the coasts and synchronous seaward coastal land growth.

    Earlier this year a senior meteorologist at the Met Office told the BBC that storms in the U.K. were becoming “more intense” due to climate change. In fact the opposite is true, with Paul Homewood noting that this is confirmed by the Met Office, which has made it clear that the Burns Storm in 1990, the Boxing Day Storm in 1998 and the Great Storm of 1987 were very much more severe than any storm in the last decade.

    The above illustration shows clearly the decline in wind speeds going back over 50 years. One annual analysis of top wind gusts at Bingley is said to confirm this trend and suggests that wind speeds have been falling.

    The British Isles are rainy places and plenty of climate mischief can be made from all the natural variations to be expected given its northern location near the top of the Atlantic Ocean. “Why is it raining so much,” asked Ben Rich of the BBC last April. Hardly headline stuff one might think since similar sentiments have probably occurred to everyone who has ever lived in these sodden lands. According to Rich, the Met Office predicts that by 2070, winters in the U.K. will be up to 30% wetter than they were in 1990, while rainfall will be up to 25% more intense.

    No doubt computer models are behind this crystal ball gazing but the actual evidence of recent trends suggests something more modest. Homewood notes that annual rainfall in England and Wales has been increasing since 1980 but the 10-year average is at a similar level to earlier periods such as the 1870s and 1920s. There was a significant rise in rainfall in Scotland during the 1980s, he observed, but there has been little change in trend since. Meanwhile, rainfall trends in Northern Ireland have barely changed since 1931. As to rainfall becoming “more intense”, Homewood notes that in England and Wales only seven days have exceeded 30mm since records began in 1931, but none of these have occurred since 2000.

    Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.

    via Watts Up With That?

    https://ift.tt/GWYM5xS

    November 23, 2024 at 04:14AM

    Low-Lying Bangladesh Growing in Size

    By Paul Homewood

     

    A new study has analysed how rivers and the coast have changed over the years in Bangladesh:

     

     

     image

    https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43217-024-00207-4.pdf

    There is a lot of technical stuff, but one surprising finding is that that low-lying Bangladesh has grown in size over the last 34 years.

    image

    image

    image

    This of course goes against the commonly held belief that land is being eroded away by storms and rising seas.

    As the maps show, it is a mixed bag. Some area have seen a loss of land, but this is more than offset by gains elsewhere.

    But none of this should come as a surprise, because this is how deltas work. They are always in a constant state of flux, as river channels move around, mud banks erode away, all to be replaced by silt brought from upstream.

    via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

    https://ift.tt/ZLJ2umw

    November 23, 2024 at 03:51AM