Category: Daily News

German Professor: 2022-2024 Warming Mostly Linked To Natural Factors, Not CO2

In his latest newsletter, German professor Fritz Vahrenholt reports how the global average temperature has decreased in June and early July 2025, and has seen a downward trend since January 2025. The deviation from the long-term average of satellite measurements is +0.48 degrees Celsius, with values continuing to drop in July.

Despite this global development, German public broadcasters and parties like the Green Party have been spreading panic about the summer heat. There are even preposterous demands for “heat days off” from work. The number of so-called summerlike days (i.e. temps 25°C and over) has increased from an average of 20-30 in the 1950s to 40-50 per year today.

However, according to Vahrenholt, the primary cause of the current warming observed between 2022 and 2024 is primarily natural phenomena and not CO2. These natural factors are 1) a strong El Niño and 2) an increase in direct solar radiation, attributed to the reduction of aerosols.

Based on NASA CERES satellite measurements from the last 25 years, 80% of the warming is due to cloud thinning and the resulting increase in direct shortwave solar radiation, while only 20% is attributed to the CO2 greenhouse effect. The climate models have not predicted an increase in shortwave radiation and that fewer clouds would actually weaken the greenhouse effect, contradicting the models.

Annual sunshine anomaly in hours for Germany since 1950. More sunshine means warmer temperatures. Reference period is  1961-1990. Source: DWD. 

Vahrenholt also cites a connection between the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) and cloud formation and sunshine duration. During high ocean temperatures, clouds are said to be more permeable, allowing more sunlight to pass through. This correlation is supported by a publication in Nature Scientific Reports, showing that sunshine duration follows the cycles of Atlantic temperatures (AMO).

Vahrenholt concludes that current climate policies in Europe and Germany, aiming for net-zero CO2 emissions by 2045, are based on inadequate models because they don’t sufficiently account for the essential mechanisms of warming (especially the role of clouds and direct solar radiation).

In summary, CO2 human CO2 emissions are not the primary driver of our climate. Instead, the main drivers are natural cycles and changes in aerosol concentrations and cloud formation.

Donate – choose an amount

via NoTricksZone

https://ift.tt/iSxNWGF

July 10, 2025 at 01:51AM

MET OFFICE CAUGHT OUT CHEATING ON TEMPERATURE RECORDS

Super sleuth, Ray Sanders has caught out the Met Office again cooking the books on temperature measurements. This shameless lot are trying to brazen it out, hoping their previous good reputation will make people think they are pillars of society. But as case after case start mounting they will find it gets harder and harder. 

 Wattisham WMO03590 – “we do not attribute unmodified values from one station to another station.” Oh yes you do.  | Tallbloke’s Talkshop

via climate science

https://ift.tt/VgiY9er

July 10, 2025 at 01:33AM

NOAA’s 2020 Prediction Bust: “U. S. Winter Outlook: Cooler North, Warmer South”

Editor’s Note: Master Resource’s founder and editor, Rob Bradley, is currently struggling with the aftermath of torrential flooding in the Texas Hill Country. Until he can return to work, he has asked me to post “classic” MR entries. Yesterday, he called in to suggest the following blog post would be a suitable classic. It ran initially at MR on March 11, 2021. —Roger Donway, Managing Editor

By way of introduction, Rob writes: “To critics, NOAA not only provides information but misinformation based on climate models and attribution studies. The post below provides the example of NOAA’s prediction leading into the Texas Winter of 2020–2021.”

“NOAA’s timely and accurate seasonal outlooks and short-term forecasts are the result of improved satellite observations, more detailed computer forecast modeling, and expanding supercomputing capacity,” said Neil Jacobs, Ph.D., acting NOAA administrator. (below)

Cold extremes decrease and warm extremes increase in a warmer world, and cold extremes tend to be more sensitive to global warming than the warm ones. (emphasis added) Science Bulletin, below

Humility in the face of unknowns is a worthy attribute. And when it comes to the Earth’s climate, in the whole and regionally, a prediction can be worse than no prediction.

Enter climate models, the Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and politics. And a very bad result for the South this winter. The lack of weatherization in Texas for traditional power plants, in particular, might well have been influenced by the climate narrative of warmer winters.

NOAA Misfire

The October 15, 2020, Press Release from NOAA speaks for itself.

NOAA’s winter forecast for the U.S. favors warmer, drier conditions across the southern tier of the U.S., and cooler, wetter conditions in the North, thanks in part to an ongoing La Nina. Forecasters at NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center — a division of the National Weather Service — are also closely monitoring persistent drought during the winter months ahead, with more than 45% of the continental U.S. now experiencing drought.

“NOAA’s timely and accurate seasonal outlooks and short-term forecasts are the result of improved satellite observations, more detailed computer forecast modeling, and expanding supercomputing capacity,” said Neil Jacobs, Ph.D., acting NOAA administrator. “From expansive and multi-hazard winter storms to narrow but intense lake effect snow, NOAA will provide the necessary information to keep communities safe.”

Currently, large areas of drought extend over the western half of the U.S., with parts of the Northeast also experiencing drought and near-record low stream flows. With a La Nina climate pattern in place, southern parts of the U.S. may experience expanded and intensifying drought during the winter months ahead. 

“With La Nina well established and expected to persist through the upcoming 2020 winter season, we anticipate the typical, cooler, wetter North, and warmer, drier South, as the most likely outcome of winter weather that the U.S. will experience this year,” said Mike Halpert, deputy director of NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center.

Temperature

The greatest chances for warmer-than-normal conditions extend across the Southern tier of the U.S. from the Southwest, across the Gulf states and into the Southeast. More modest probabilities for warmer temperatures are forecast in the southern parts of the west coast, and from the Mid-Atlantic into the Northeast. Above-average temperatures are also favored for Hawaii and western and northern Alaska. 

Below-normal temperatures are favored in southern Alaska and from the northern Pacific Northwest into the Northern Plains, with equal chances for below-, near- or above-average temperatures in the remaining regions….

About NOAA’s seasonal outlooks

NOAA’s seasonal outlooks provide the likelihood that temperatures and total precipitation amounts will be above-, near- or below-average, and how drought conditions are favored to change. The outlook does not project seasonal snowfall accumulations; snow forecasts are generally not predictable more than a week in advance. 

Seasonal outlooks help communities prepare for what is likely to come in the months ahead and minimize weather’s impacts on lives and livelihoods. Empowering people with actionable forecasts and winter weather safety tips is key to NOAA’s effort to build a more Weather-Ready Nation.

Climate Model Misfires

Data-hound Bjorn Lomborg recently exposed the “global weirding” argument that the human influence produces the opposite of global warming.

CBS [Ben Tracy] & Kerry say “Many people wrongly believe that climate change only relates to temperatures increasing, not decreasing.” But the reality is that *all* climate models show less frost, fewer cold days, fewer cold nights.

Lomborg then links to graphs showing that ALL Climate Models predict fewer cold days and cold nights. He then links to “Future extreme climate changes linked to global warming intensity,” Science Bulletin (December 30, 2017), where the authors state:

Based on the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) daily dataset, we investigate changes of the terrestrial extreme climates given that the global mean temperature increases persistently under the Representative Concentration Pathways 8.5 (RCP8.5) scenario.

Compared to preindustrial conditions, more statistically significant extreme temperatures, precipitations, and dry spells are expected in the 21st century. Cold extremes decrease and warm extremes increase in a warmer world, and cold extremes tend to be more sensitive to global warming than the warm ones.

When the global mean temperature increases, cold nights, cold days, and warm nights all display nonlinear relationships with it, such as the weakening of the link projected after 3 °C global warming, while the other indices generally exhibit differently, with linear relationships.

“Global Weirding” to the Rescue

In trying to square the record cold with global warming, CBS & Kerry (above) settled on the term “global weirding.”

Ben Tracy,  senior national and environmental correspondent for CBS, asked guest John Kerry about the recent cold snap:

Some people get hung up on the term “global warming” and say, “well, I thought everything’s supposed to get warmer?” I heard one scientist say this is really “global weirding.” Is that a better way to think of this?

Kerry answered:

I think it’s a very appropriate way to think of it. It’s directly related to the warming even though your instinct is to say, “wait a minute. This is the new ice age.” But it’s not. It is coming from the global warming and it threatens all the normal weather patterns.

Where did the catch-all “global weirding” come from? Thomas Friedman might have popularized it in the New York Times eleven years ago:

Avoid the term “global warming.” I prefer the term “global weirding,” because that is what actually happens as global temperatures rise and the climate changes. The weather gets weird. The hots are expected to get hotter, the wets wetter, the dries drier and the most violent storms more numerous.

The fact that it has snowed like crazy in Washington while it has rained at the Winter Olympics in Canada, while Australia is having a record 13-year drought is right in line with what every major study on climate change predicts: The weather will get weird; some areas will get more precipitation than ever; others will become drier than ever.

Conclusion

If climate change causes everything, it causes nothing. Global weirding is the (central planning, one-world-government) emperor’s new clothes. If that term were not politically correct, or if a fossil fuel company pulled out the explanation for a financial or operational failure, it would be laughed out of the park.

The post NOAA’s 2020 Prediction Bust: “U. S. Winter Outlook: Cooler North, Warmer South” appeared first on Master Resource.

via Master Resource

https://ift.tt/M9CQFWi

July 10, 2025 at 01:14AM

America Must Lead on Seafloor Mineral Development

By Alina Voss

An untapped energy savior might just be sitting on the ocean floor. From AI to defense to clean energy, critical minerals remain pivotal to securing the United States’ competitive edge. Unfortunately, supply chains remain precariously dependent on foreign control, often from adversarial nations like China, leaving the country vulnerable to price shocks, trade restrictions, and supply disruption. While bipartisan efforts are gathering momentum around ideas to strengthen U.S. mineral security through efforts like reviving domestic mining, strategic alliances, and even recycling programs, land-based deposits alone may not be enough to meet the explosive growth in demand anticipated over the coming decades. We may need to look deeper for solutions, specifically to the ocean floor.

Polymetallic nodules, potato-sized rocks found scattered across the seafloor, particularly in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ), between Hawaii and Mexico. These nodules are rich in four of the same minerals needed to fuel clean energy supply chains: nickel, cobalt, copper, and manganese. Unlike terrestrial sources, which often contain only one or two of these metals and require energy-intensive processing, seafloor nodules contain all four in high purity and are loosely embedded in sediment, meaning they can be collected with minimal crushing or waste rock removal. The CCZ alone is estimated to hold more nickel and cobalt than all known land-based reserves combined. They represent a rare convergence between vast untapped mineral resources and emerging technology in deep sea robotics and AI-powered collection technologies. If harnessed responsibly, it could prove determinative for the future of American clean energy security.

To catalyze the emergence of a domestic seafloor minerals industry, federal support should mirror successful precedents in space and semiconductor policy (like the COTS program or CHIPS act) by leveraging targeted public-private partnerships, milestone-based R&D funding, and interagency coordination. These mechanisms align well with President Trump’s broader industrial strategy, especially his second-term push to reassert American leadership in critical technologies. The development of deep-sea collection systems requires the same precision robotics, long-duration autonomy, and AI-driven sensor fusion technologies now prioritized in Trump’s Executive Orders on domestic energy dominance, which already task agencies like DOE, DARPA, and NSF with advancing advanced manufacturing and next-gen energy. The seafloor minerals sector presents an ideal testbed to apply those mandates, driving innovation while securing access to four of the most strategically important metals for both defense and clean tech. As the administration reforms permitting timelines, retools the Department of Energy’s innovation programs, and expands national security-driven procurement, now is the moment to integrate seafloor minerals into America’s critical mineral toolkit.

Despite the opportunities for seafloor minerals to bolster American environmental impacts through advancing clean energy, a wave of critique has arisen, largely arguing that using seafloor minerals will have negative environmental impacts. Claims that seafloor nodule collection could impede the ocean’s ability to store carbon dioxide continue to circulate, despite little evidence. Not to mention, experts say that this alarmism neglects the counterfactual that the amount of carbon dioxide released by seafloor mineral collection is “negligibly tiny” when compared with emissions of on-land mining activities.

Letting geopolitical rivals lead on nodule development or critical minerals more broadly is a strategic mistake both for U.S. supply chain and environmental policy. The short window of opportunity, particularly for the Trump administration, to shape the critical mineral industry for the better is a make-or-break moment in gaining the technological edge for the coming decades of American industry. The U.S. should take swift, targeted action by forging strategic alliances with allies like Japan and Australia to coordinate exploration, recognizing nodules as “domestic content” when first landed in the U.S., unlocking manufacturing incentives, and finally by expanding federal R&D and streamlining permitting.

The United States has a rare opportunity to secure not only the security of its supply chains but also the future of its clean energy industry by responsibly advancing seafloor mineral development. With strategic investment, smart regulation, and proactive utilization of the resources available to us, America can shape the rules of the game while securing access to the critical materials that power 21st-century technologies. 

Alina Voss is a fellow with ConservAmerica.

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/JylpZ0M

July 10, 2025 at 12:05AM