Category: Daily News

A Blobocrat Court rules that perfect weather is a “human right”

By Jo Nova

The Blob makes another move to expand their empire

A group of unelected officials in something called the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) has decided that humans have the “right” to a stable climate and thus, you have the right to pay for it. The court that nobody has heard of says “states have legal obligations to protect people alive today and future generations from the impacts of climate breakdown.”

This includes the obligation to cut emissions, and to guard against the threat of climate disinformation. (Yes, they know they are lying.)

Personally I’d prefer to have the right to free speech, real science, and laws written in simple English:

Countries must protect human right to a stable climate, court rules

Isabella Kaminski, The Guardian

There is a human right to a stable climate and states have a duty to protect it, a top court has ruled.

“Top court”, my foot.

Like pagan sorcery, the government is expected to stop storms, floods and droughts. Even though this is an impossible fantasy the mere attempt at managing the illusion of it will employ tens of thousands of lawyers, accountants, technicians, diplomats […]

via JoNova

https://ift.tt/NAxZbIc

July 5, 2025 at 01:23AM

Saturday

8.9 out of 10 based on 8 ratings

via JoNova

https://ift.tt/dnLAh8F

July 5, 2025 at 01:23AM

Four Reasons Why This 4th of July Is Better

By Larry Behrens

As Americans fire up their grills and head out on road trips, there’s something to celebrate this Independence Day: energy sanity is making a comeback.

This year, there’s a little more freedom on the menu. After years of being shackled by a radical green agenda, 2025 is shaping up to be the year we finally hit the brakes and throw it in reverse.

Here are four reasons why this 4th of July is better than the last:

1. Gas prices are over 31 cents cheaper

According to AAA, the national average for gasoline is more than 31 cents cheaper per gallon than it was last year at this time. That may not sound like much—until you fill up your tank and realize that’s nearly $5 per fill up in a 15-gallon tank. Better yet, gas is now a whopping $1.83 cheaper per gallon than the record highs we saw under Joe Biden just three years ago. 

That’s not an accident. It’s the result of prioritizing American energy, not punishing it.

2. You don’t live in California or Washington

While much of America is seeing relief at the pump, California and Washington are doubling down on failure.

In California, gas prices—already the highest in the nation—are about to skyrocket by 65 cents a gallon thanks to regulations and a state gas tax hike. 

Meanwhile, in Washington, gas prices have actually gone up 10 cents from last year, bucking the national trend. And on July 1st, the state is tacking on a new 6-cent-per-gallon gas tax, because nothing says “happy Independence Day” like making driving unaffordable. 

If you’re not in those states, breathe a sigh of relief—and maybe send a thank-you card to your local leaders who haven’t lost their minds.

3. The war against our appliances is over

This Independence Day, go ahead and crank the air conditioner and fire up that gas grill—because the federal assault on your home appliances is over.

The Biden administration’s war on dishwashers, water heaters, stoves, and ceiling fans has been halted. The savings are real as the cost of replacing everything Joe Biden wanted you to replace in your house was near $10,000 per home. And that’s even before you buy that electric vehicle! This year, the senseless effort to force every American into higher costs and worse performance has officially been scrapped. 

Be sure to celebrate by using your appliances freely—without guilt, government overreach, or green lecturing.

4. The Big Beautiful Bill beats back the Green New Scam

Remember the so-called Inflation Reduction Act? It turned out to be a massive slush fund for green special interests and Chinese supply chains. But now, the Big Beautiful Bill is finally pulling the plug.

Washington, D.C. is proposing to phase out wasteful green energy tax credits, and even better—impose a new tax on wind and solar projects that rely on Chinese components.  If your so-called clean energy plan depends on slave labor and subsidies, maybe it’s not that clean after all.

Last year, Americans were told to accept high prices, appliance mandates, and dependence on China—all in the name of a green fantasy. This year, we’re turning the page.

Gas is cheaper. Appliance tyranny is dead. Green grift is getting taxed. And a little common sense is finally clawing its way back into Washington, D.C.

So, this 4th of July, as you hit the road, flip the burgers, and crank the AC, remember this: we’re proudly celebrating America’s independence— but we’re also reclaiming our own.

From gas tanks to grill flames, freedom is back—and it runs on American energy.

Larry Behrens is an energy expert and the Communications Director for Power The Future. He has appeared on Fox News, ZeroHedge, and NewsMax speaking in defense of American energy workers. You can follow him on X/Twitter @larrybehrens

This article was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/wBTyl7m

July 5, 2025 at 12:04AM

Inter-American Court Rules Nations Must Reduce Emissions and Censor Skeptics

Essay by Eric Worrall

An international body which thinks it can dictate climate policy and free speech policy to the United States.

Countries must protect human right to a stable climate, court rules

Costa Rica-based inter-American court of human rights says states have obligation to respond to climate change

Isabella Kaminski Fri 4 Jul 2025 07.53 AEST

There is a human right to a stable climate and states have a duty to protect it, a top court has ruled.

In the strongly worded and wide-ranging 300-page document setting out its perspective on the climate emergency and human rights, the court says states have legal obligations to protect people alive today and future generations from the impacts of climate breakdown. That includes taking “urgent and effective” actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions based on the best available science, to adapt, to cooperate internationally, and to guard against the threat of climate disinformation.

The IACHR’s founding purpose is to interpret and apply the American convention on human rights, a treaty ratified by members of the Organization of American States (OAS). But its newly published opinion takes into account a broad range of national, regional and international laws and principles. And it affirms that the findings not just apply only to signatories of the convention but to all 35 members of the OAS, which includes the US and Canada.

The inter-American court of human rights is the second of four top courts to publish an advisory opinion on climate change.

The first court to publish its opinion, the international tribunal for the law of the sea, concluded last year that greenhouse gases are pollutants that are wrecking the marine environment, and states have a legal responsibility to control them.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/jul/03/countries-must-protect-human-right-to-a-stable-climate-court-rules

Court judgement links:

Press release: https://www.corteidh.or.cr/comunicados_prensa.cfm?lang=en&n=2151
Consultative opinion page: https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/OC-32-2025/index-eng.html
Consultative opinion (?) – Spanish, dated 29th May: https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_32_esp.pdf

There may be a more recent document, please post in comments if you find it.

The 29th May consultative opinion I found contains lots of references to “desinformación”, including this apparent call for censorship of dissenting views;

529. Finalmente, teniendo en cuenta el papel determinante que desempeñan en esta
materia las empresas, los desarrolladores de tecnología digital, las plataformas
tecnológicas, las redes sociales y los medios de comunicación, la Corte enfatiza la
necesidad de que, conforme a lo señalado en el Pacto para el Futuro, los Estados
colaboren con dichos actores para fortalecer la alfabetización mediática e informativa.
Esta colaboración debe orientarse a que las personas usuarias adquieran habilidades
y conocimientos que les permitan interactuar de manera crítica, segura y consciente
con los contenidos digitales. En suma, este Tribunal subraya que el acceso a
información veraz y confiable en el contexto de la emergencia climática hace necesario
el compromiso conjunto de los Estados y los actores privados para prevenir y
contrarrestar la desinformación.

GOOGLE Translate:

529. Finally, taking into account the determining role they play in this matter companies, digital technology developers, platforms technological technologies, social networks and the media, the Court emphasizes the need that, in accordance with what is indicated in the Pact for the Future, the States collaborate with these actors to strengthen media and information literacy. This collaboration should be aimed at ensuring that users acquire skills and knowledge that allows them to interact critically, safely and consciously with digital content. In short, this Court emphasizes that access to truthful and reliable information in the context of the climate emergency makes it necessary the joint commitment of States and private actors to prevent and counteract misinformation.

Read more: https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_32_esp.pdf

The article references a previous agreement by an international body to start charging a carbon tax on all global shipping. The following is the WUWT article on the previous international tribunal for the law of the sea ruling;

I doubt this nonsense judgement will have any impact on the USA, at least under the current administration. The Trump administration responded in the lead up to the previous ITLOS tribunal judgement (see above) with a threat of retaliation against any nation which tries to impose carbon taxes on US shipping.

Trump tells countries to ax talks on shipping carbon tax, or else

The attack on the shipping deal is part of a wider U.S. rejection of policies to fight climate change.

APRIL 9, 2025 10:50 AM CET

BY FONIE MITSOPOULOU

LONDON — The Trump administration has upended what it calls “blatantly unfair” talks to set a carbon tax on international shipping and has vowed “reciprocal measures” to shield U.S. ships from any fees, according to a letter seen by POLITICO.

It was circulated to many embassies of the other countries in attendance by the U.S. government. It was seen by POLITICO, having been obtained by an industry group via a national delegation, and was confirmed by other participants in the talks.

The letter stated: “President Trump has made it clear that the U.S. will not accept any international environmental agreement that unduly or unfairly burdens the U.S. or the interest of the American people.”

Read more: https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-scrap-maritime-decarbonization-talks/

The Trump administration and Vice President Vance have also taken a firm line against attempts by overseas bodies to censor American free speech.

JD Vance says US could drop support for NATO if Europe tries to regulate Elon Musk’s platforms

Republican vice presidential nominee says ‘Germans and other nations’ – not Russia – would ‘have to fund Ukraine’s reconstruction’ 

Gustaf Kilander
Washington DC
Tuesday 17 September 2024 22:39 BST

JD Vance has suggested that American support for NATO should be predicated on the European Union not regulating Elon Musk and his X social media platform, formerly known as Twitter.

The Republican vice presidential nominee and Ohio senator claimed in an interview with YouTuber Shawn Ryan that a top EU official had threatened to arrest the billionaire if he allowed former President Donald Trump back on X. 

“The leader, I forget exactly which official it was within the European Union, but sent Elon this threatening letter that basically said, ‘We’re going to arrest you if you platform Donald Trump,’ who, by the way, is the likely next president of the United States,” Vance said in the interview published last week.

Read more: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/jd-vance-elon-musk-x-twitter-donald-trump-b2614525.html

I’m guessing any nation which attempts to use this absurd judgement as an excuse to loot US companies or punish US social media companies will face a similarly vigorous response from the Trump Administration.

It is unfortunate the court consultative opinion only appears to be available in Spanish. If any fluent Spanish speakers have time to wade through 234 pages of legalise, or can find more recent documents, please post any other interesting clauses in the court ruling in comments. This would be a useful exercise even if an English version of the ruling is made available, sometimes different language versions of documents contain substantial discrepancies.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/w9RG3WL

July 4, 2025 at 08:03PM