Category: Daily News

Friday

0 out of 10 based on 0 rating

via JoNova

https://ift.tt/4UwjhYf

August 21, 2025 at 09:40AM

Comment on the most honest climate assessment in years

Energy Secretary Chris Wright has asked the public to engage with this important work and kick off a meaningful dialogue. 

via CFACT

https://ift.tt/0LM7EOZ

August 21, 2025 at 09:24AM

How CO2 both Warms and Cools our Atmosphere

By Jim Steele

Focusing only on CO2’s warming effect distorts our understanding of how the atmosphere warms and cools. More importantly it ignores how CO2 is critical for cooling our atmosphere.  Oxygen and nitrogen comprise 99% of our atmosphere. Those molecules do not absorb or emit radiation. Our air is heated by collisions with solar heated surfaces and warmer atmospheric molecules. So, we must understand how oxygen and nitrogen shed their absorbed energy, so it can exit back to space.

Only the sun’s radiation adds heat to our world. Of the arriving solar heat 30% is reflected without warming the earth. 20% warms the atmosphere directly and only 50% warms the earth’s surface.

About 25% of that surface heat (12 units) gets radiated back to space immediately at wavelengths that are not affected by greenhouse gases.

About 14% (7 units) of the surface heat warms the air above via surface collisions with that heated air carried away from the surface by rising convection.

Slightly less than 50% (23 units) of the surface heat causes evaporation with moist convection also carrying heat away from the surface.

The surface only radiates 16% (8 units) of absorbed heat away, which is however also intercepted by greenhouse gases, primarily water and CO2. But greenhouse gases redirect some of that heat back to the surface and slow the earth’s cooling rate.

Eventually at the top of our atmosphere (the troposphere) greenhouse gases must radiate about 58% of all incoming solar heat back to space.

This diagram illustrates the physics showing how the earth cools by radiating infrared heat back to space according to Planck’s Law.

The 320k dashed line represents how much heat via each infrared wavelength should theoretically radiate back to space if there is no interference from greenhouse gases. Here, its from the Sahara desert’s surface when the surface is heated to 47 Celsius. This theoretical line is based on solid reproducible & trustworthy science.

The other dashed lines represent how much heat each wavelength should radiate from cooler temperatures. These cooler temperatures happen at higher altitudes as seen in the table on the right.

The solid black line represents what wavelengths of heat that satellites actually detected leaving earth. The thin red lines are model predictions. Only infrared heat with wavelengths between 10 and 13 microns as well as between 8 and 9.5 match theory. That’s because greenhouse gases do not interfere with those wavelengths, allowing 25% of the surface heat to escape immediately.

Water vapor absorbs infrared wavelengths between 14 & 25 microns as well and between 6 & 8 microns. Satellites detect those wavelengths but with intensities suggesting the heat has radiated from cooler temperatures. Satellites can’t detect the latent heat absorbed during water’s evaporation at the surface, but satellites do see the heat once released when water vapor cools and condenses to form clouds and rain at 1 to 4 kilometers of altitude.  Above water vapor’s condensation altitudes, water vapor provides an insignificant greenhouse effect as the air is very dry.

CO2 primarily absorbs infrared centered around 15 micron wavelengths but satellites do not detect any heat from 15 micron wavelengths being emitted from the surface or lower atmosphere. So, a second critical question is why don’t satellites detect 15 micron wavelengths until the top of the troposphere and stratosphere? Radiant heat proven to be absorbed and emitted by CO2.

Greenhouse theory argues infrared absorbed by CO2 is trapped near the surface according to the following model.

Surface heat radiates upward but some is intercepted by greenhouse gases.

Those gases absorb the infrared heat but then quickly emit it.  However, about half is redirected back towards the surface, slowing the surface’s cooling rate.

The infrared that continues upwards is again intercepted sending half back towards the surface

The same dynamic continues so by 2 to 4 kilometers altitude, virtually no surface radiation absorbed and emitted by CO2 escapes.  So, satellites simply don’t detect it.

The same diminishing dynamic reduces the amount of infrared emitted from higher altitudes that can reach the surface. So, most scientists believe warming via a greenhouse effect happens mostly in the lowest atmosphere.

But this dynamic only partially explains atmospheric warming.

That greenhouse theory does not account for how collisions, as illustrated by Newton’s Cradle, that transfer energy from greenhouse gases to non-greenhouse gases and vice versa.

Water and CO2 do not trap absorbed infrared heat, but quickly emit it in just milliseconds after it is absorbed. This is called the relaxation time.

Now compare well studied collision frequencies to relaxation times.

Near the surface, nitrogen molecules can collide with CO6 billion times in just one second. So, before a COmolecule can relax and emit any radiation, nitrogen will collide 600,000 times with COand steal it’s absorbed energy and transfer it to other atmospheric molecules via more collisions.

Collisions with nitrogen and oxygen constantly steal heat from COand because nitrogen and oxygen don’t radiate that heat,  satellites don’t detect any wavelengths centered around 15 microns until COemits that heat in the stratosphere.

Heat trapped by oxygen and nitrogen can only lose that collisionally absorbed heat by transferring energy back to a greenhouse gas via more collisions.  Only then can greenhouse gases radiate that energy back to space. However, COwill only radiate heat back to space where heat stealing collisions are greatly reduced, and that only happens in the less dense  upper troposphere and stratosphere, exactly where satellites detect 15 micron wavelength emissions back to space.

Heated air constantly convects to the upper atmosphere, but without CO2, there would be no shedding of the air’s  absorbed energy. There would only be runaway warming.

Greenhouse warming in the lower atmosphere is balanced by CO2 cooling in the stratosphere. This explains why CO2 concentrations do not correlate with earth’s temperatures over millions of years!


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/OyKk43M

August 21, 2025 at 08:06AM

The Truth Behind Britain’s Wildfires

By Paul Homewood

 

 There’s a lot to unpack here.

This was the headline in the Guardian last week:

 

 image

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/14/2025-on-track-to-beat-uk-record-for-wildfires-warn-firefighters

As usual with the Guardian, they are misinforming you.

Below is the actual data from EFFIS:

 

image

seasonal-trend_ba_GBR_2006_2024_2025(1)

seasonal-trend_bacum_GBR_2006_2024_2025(1)

https://forest-fire.emergency.copernicus.eu/apps/effis.statistics/seasonaltrend

As you can see, about three quarters of the wildfire area to date occurred in February and March, which as we know were very dry months this year. Clearly however this cannot be blamed on climate change because the Met Office keep telling us that winters are supposed to be getting wetter as a result!

But more to the point, that big spike in the first week of April was accounted for by a series of gigantic fires in the Mountains of Mourne, believed to have been started deliberately:

image

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2025/06/21/mountains-of-mourne-wildfires/

 

Since that outbreak, nothing out of the ordinary has occurred.

But behind all of this data, a real problem seems to be emerging, which has been picked up on X:

image

https://x.com/artemisfornow/status/1957335292970438931

The Telegraph also have the story:

Labour’s rewilding plans risk sparking a surge in wildfires across Britain, gamekeepers have claimed.

The Government is proposing to ban winter burning – a traditional upland management technique that reduces the amount of fuel for potential fires – from more than half of all peatland in England.

It is claimed the changes will help to “re-wet” Britain’s peat bogs, reduce the risk of wildfires and cut carbon emissions.

Environmentalists want to preserve peat bogs because they soak up vast quantities of carbon. But landowners and gamekeepers have claimed that, far from protecting the environment, the burning restrictions will instead leave Britain’s moors and heaths at the mercy of wildfires that will be “too large to fight”.

Winter burns create firebreaks in upland areas by forming strips where there is less flammable foliage, thereby limiting the speed at which wildfires can spread.

But in 2021, the burns were banned from areas of “deep peat” – where it extends for 40cm or deeper – in conservation areas, totalling 222,000 hectares of land.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) is now consulting on plans to extend the burning restrictions to 368,000 hectares of peat by lowering the threshold for “deep peat” to 30cm.

The department argues that wetter peat will reduce the chance of wildfires. But gamekeepers have warned the changes would leave swathes of the countryside vulnerable.

Full story here.

The 2030 Agenda is a global framework established by the United Nations to address pressing challenges like poverty, inequality, climate change, and environmental degradation by 2030. It includes 17 Sustainable Development Goals, including biodiversity loss.

We can also see a connection here with the recent wildfires in Spain, mostly in Galicia – the Telegraph reported this week;

In Galicia, large stretches of unmanaged vegetation and depopulated villages in forested land have led to the build-up of wildfire fuel, said Adrian Regos, an ecologist at the Biological Mission of Galicia, a research institute.

We also know that exactly the same phenomenon of abandoned plantations in Maui was the reason why the fires got out of hand there a couple of years ago. There the well managed plantations of a few years ago have since been abandoned and overgrown with savanna like invasive grasses, which act as a tinderbox.

As I say, a lot to unpack.

But it is simplistic in the extreme to blame any of these fires on climate change.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/wb5ALGD

August 21, 2025 at 04:27AM