Category: Daily News

Inside Solar: Rethink Time (straight talk from an advocate)

“Now that the subsidies are gone, are you going to fold your tent, or create a business that is a survivor?” – (Doug Houseman, below)

Electricity expert and solar advocate Doug Houseman (we debate on LinkedIn) recently posted on the new reality for the subsidy-entitled solar industry. He is reacting to the Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill rollback (but not elimination!) of the Inflation Reduction Act, Investment Tax Credit, and Production Tax Credit.

“Today the world changed,” he began. “With the passage of the Mega bill energy assurance went away.”

It was that solar and wind developers and installers had a pretty good idea of what subsidies they would get, the subsidies were untouchable, and stable for decades. A little change here and there, but largely they stayed the same. Even though it made little sense to provide subsidies to rooftop solar, it was very stable too. Now they are not.

Houseman continued:

Tomorrow is a good day to reflect on your business and what you are going to do/change to make it grow without subsidies. How you are going to improve what you do, so you can lower your cost to the customer. Rooftop solar has been going up in cost, not down for the last decade, higher material costs, more expensive labor, insurance costs rising and so forth.

Is it robots, drones, cranes, or what to reduce the risk of getting it on the roof? What do you do to lower your business risk, and with it insurance costs. How do you take the bite out of marketing and quoting? How do you increase your win rate? How do you reduce your cost of capital and your maintenance burden, while increasing customer satisfaction?

Now that the subsidies are gone, are you going to fold your tent, or create a business that is a survivor?

Kudos to Doug Houseman. It is a new era, and it is time for the solar industry to get down to free market size. That starts off the grid, not on it, if the past is any guide.

The post Inside Solar: Rethink Time (straight talk from an advocate) appeared first on Master Resource.

via Master Resource

https://ift.tt/ugoSaCK

August 5, 2025 at 01:10AM

Back To The Future

The National Academy of Sciences asks “When could scientists have first known about climate change?” National Academy of Sciences on X: “When could scientists have first known about climate change? A thought experiment by #NASmembers Ben Santer, Susan Solomon & … Continue reading

via Real Climate Science

https://ift.tt/g5Zu91z

August 5, 2025 at 12:59AM

BBC & Melting Glaciers In Switzerland

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

h/t Philip Bratby

In a small village in Switzerland’s beautiful Loetschental valley, Matthias Bellwald walks down the main street and is greeted every few steps by locals who smile or offer a handshake or friendly word.

Mr Bellwald is a mayor, but this isn’t his village. Two months ago his home, three miles away in Blatten, was wiped off the map when part of the mountain and glacier collapsed into the valley.

The village’s 300 residents had been evacuated days earlier, after geologists warned that the mountain was increasingly unstable. But they lost their homes, their church, their hotels and their farms.

Lukas Kalbermatten also lost the hotel that had been in his family for three generations.”The feeling of the village, all the small alleys through the houses, the church, the memories you had when you played there as a child… all this is gone.”

Though the disaster shocked Switzerland, some two thirds of the country is mountainous, and climate scientists warn that the glaciers and the permafrost – the glue that holds the mountains together – are thawing as the global temperature increases, making landslides more likely. Protecting areas will be costly.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj4w9ggzxv4o

BBC INDEPTH? Don’t make me laugh.

A properly objective report would have also mentioned the downhill march of Swiss glaciers in the Little Ice Age.

My review of Brian Fagan’s excellent book, The Little Ice Age, gives a flavour of just how dreadful those times were. [Sections in italics are direct quotes]:


We tend to regard alpine landscapes today such as those in Switzerland as being picturesque and think that the people there live in a beautiful rural idyll. It was not always so. In the 16th Century the occasional traveller would remark on the poverty and suffering of those who lived on the marginal lands in the glacier’s shadow. At that time Chamonix was an obscure poverty stricken parish in “a poor country of barren mountains never free of glaciers and frosts…half the year there is no sun…the corn is gathered in the snow…and is so mouldy it has to be heated in the oven”. Even animals were said to refuse bread made from Chamonix wheat. Avalanches caused by low temperatures and deep snowfall were a constant hazard. In 1575 a visitor described the village as “a place covered with glaciers…often the fields are entirely swept away and the wheat blown into the woods and onto the glaciers”.

In 1589 the Allalin glacier in Switzerland descended so low that it blocked the Saas valley, forming a lake. The moraine broke a few months later, sending floods downstream. Seven years later 70 people died when similar floods from the Gietroz glacier submerged the town of Martigny.

As the glaciers relentlessly pushed downslope, thousands of acres of farm land were ruined and many villages were left uninhabitable such as La Bois where a government official noted “where there are still six houses. all uninhabited save two, in which live some wretched women and children…Above and adjoining the village there is a great and horrible glacier of great and incalculable volume which can promise nothing but the destruction of the houses and lands which still remain”. Eventually the village was completely abandoned.

The same official visited the hamlet of La Rosiere in 1616 and found “The great glacier of La Rosiere every now and then goes bounding and thrashing or descending…There have been destroyed 43 journaux of land with nothing but stones and 8 houses, 7 barns and 5 little granges have been entirely ruined and destroyed”.

Alpine glaciers, which had already advanced steadily between 1546 and 1590, moved aggressively forward again between 1600 and 1616. Villages that had flourished since medieval times were in danger or already destroyed. During the long period of glacial retreat and relative quiet in earlier times, opportunistic farmers had cleared land within a kilometer of what seemed to them to be stationary ice sheets. Now their descendants paid the price with their villages and livelihoods threatened.

Between 1627 and 1633 Chamonix lost a third of its land through avalanches, snow, glaciers and flooding, and the remaining hectares were under constant threat. In 1642 the Des Bois glacier advanced “over a musket shot every day, even in August”.

By this time people near the ice front were planting only oats and a little barley in fields that were under snow for most of the year. Their forefathers had paid their tithes in wheat. Now they obtained but one harvest in three and even the grain rotted after harvesting. “The people here are so badly fed they are dark and wretched and seem only half alive”.

In 1715 the village of Le Pre-du-Bar vanished under a glacier caused landslide. The glacial high tide in the Alps came around 1750 and gradually the glaciers began their retreat, much to the relief of the people who lived there.


The BBC might like to consider that none of these villages were there three hundred years ago because the glaciers were there instead.

I somehow doubt anybody in Switzerland would want a return to those days.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/ALYG94Z

August 5, 2025 at 12:02AM

Utility Bills Spiking As America’s Power Demand Takes Off

From THE DAILY CALLER

Daily Caller News Foundation

Audrey Streb
DCNF Energy Reporter

Electricity costs are surging as America’s power needs climb, driven in part by the growing demand from power-hungry artificial intelligence (AI) data centers, according to data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA).

Residential electricity prices have risen nationwide by about 6.5% between May 2024 and May 2025, according to EIA data. The build out of power-hungry data centers needed to sustain AI development in the coming years is expected to put significant upward pressure on U.S. electricity demand, which could drive prices higher yet if available supply does not grow quickly.

“If we are going to keep the lights on, win the AI race, and keep electricity prices from skyrocketing, the United States must unleash American energy,” Energy Secretary Chris Wright said in July as the Department of Energy (DOE) released a report on the U.S. electricity grid that states that blackouts could increase by a factor of 100 by as soon as 2030 if America fails to replace aging energy infrastructure. “In the coming years, America’s reindustrialization and the AI race will require a significantly larger supply of around-the-clock, reliable, and uninterrupted power.” (RELATED: Blackouts Coming If America Continues With Biden-Era Green Frenzy, Trump Admin Warns)

Only five states saw a drop in electricity prices from May 2024 to May 2025, including Nevada, Hawaii, Iowa, North Dakota and Montana, EIA data shows. States that saw the biggest spike in residential electricity bills in that period included Maine, Connecticut and Utah.

U.S. electricity demand is expected to reach unprecedented levels in the coming years, surging 25% by 2030, according to data from the EIA and a recent ICF International report. After years of relatively flat demand, the sharp rise has prompted an “urgent need” for more electricity resources, according to the major grid watchdog North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC).

Growing expectation for the re-industrialization of America is also contributing to rising U.S. energy demand, and aging energy infrastructure that is not being replaced fast enough is straining the grid, according to some energy sector experts.

The Trump administration has drawn attention to America’s growing electricity needs and has moved to ramp up dispatchable energy sources like coalnuclear and natural gas. In contrast, the Biden administration touted green energy sources like wind and solar as the future of American electricity, an approach the Trump administration and some energy experts have criticized as relying on intermittent and less effective power sources.

“You never know if these energy sources will actually be able to produce electricity when you need it — because you don’t know if the sun will be shining or the wind blowing,” Wright wrote in June.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/1ObXZJx

August 4, 2025 at 08:02PM