Category: Uncategorized

Freak June blizzard shuts down bike relay

Freak June blizzard shuts down bike relay

via Ice Age Now
http://ift.tt/2qcAwB3


First time in the race’s history.

___________________________

For the first time in its 25-year history, the Kluane Chilkat International Bike Relay was officially shut down by a freak June blizzard. The blizzard left the road covered in black ice and several inches of snow.

Many cyclists who had camped near Haines Junction, Yukon, on Friday night woke up to near-freezing temperatures and heavy snow. Some tents collapsed under the weight of the snow.

“This was totally shocking,” said Jason LaChappelle of the Wayward Salamanders, who had camped out for the night.

Four men on unicycles were the only team – out of more than 1,300 participants – to complete the route.

Even for the Yukon, a snowstorm in mid-June is unusual.

The race stretches some 148 miles (238 km) from Haines Junction, Yukon, to Haines, Alaska, with an elevation gain of more than 1,300 feet (400 m).

See several photos:
http://ift.tt/2rRRvJa

Thanks to Glenn Cuthbert for this link


The post Freak June blizzard shuts down bike relay appeared first on Ice Age Now.

via Ice Age Now http://ift.tt/2qcAwB3

June 20, 2017 at 02:26PM

Eighth Major Report Finds Water Contamination From Fracking ‘Has Not Been Observed’

Eighth Major Report Finds Water Contamination From Fracking ‘Has Not Been Observed’

via Climate Change Dispatch
http://ift.tt/2jXMFWN

A report by a Texas-based research organization found hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, has not led to widespread water contamination in the Lone Star state, further contradicting claims from environmentalists.

The Academy of Medicine, Engineering and Science of Texas (TAMEST) released its study Monday, concluding that contamination of drinking water from fracking “has not been observed in Texas.” The report noted that fracking is “highly unlikely” to contaminate drinking water aquifers, which are often far away from where the oil or natural gas is extracted.

“This study is yet another indication that the campaign to shut down fracking is based on politics, not science,” Steve Everley, spokesman, Texans for Natural Gas, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“If fracking were a credible risk to groundwater, we would know about it in Texas, which produces more oil and natural gas than any other state. The fact that such an incident hasn’t been observed here is further confirmation that fracking is safe and well-regulated,” Everley said.

The report also noted that fracking has helped Texas’s economy and reduced energy-related emissions. TAMEST is Texas’ version of the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

TAMEST’s study also notes that fracking has had other beneficial impacts on Texas, including making the state’s cleaner and reviving local economies.

This is another major study in the U.S. to conclude fracking is not a major risk to drinking water supplies.

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) published a study earlier this month that found no instances of water contamination from fracking in 116 wells across the energy-rich regions of Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a five-year study in 2016 that found fracking was not causing widespread groundwater contamination. A 2014 report by National Energy Technology Laboratory, which is run by the Energy Department, made a similar finding.

Reports by state level regulators have come to similar conclusions.

Environmentalists at the blog Ecowatch responded to such studies by arguing, “millions of Americans know that fracking contaminates groundwater and for the EPA to report any differently only proves that the greatest contamination from the industry comes from its influence and ownership of our government.”

Even scientists whose research was directly financed by environmentalists couldn’t find evidence that fracking contaminates groundwater.

“Our funders, the groups that had given us funding in the past, were a little disappointed in our results,” Amy Townsend-Small, the lead researcher of a University of Cincinnati study, told Newsweek last April. “We haven’t seen anything to show that wells have been contaminated by fracking.”

Read more at Daily Caller

via Climate Change Dispatch http://ift.tt/2jXMFWN

June 20, 2017 at 02:04PM

Sustainable ethanol from carbon dioxide? A possible path

Sustainable ethanol from carbon dioxide? A possible path

via Climate Change Dispatch
http://ift.tt/2jXMFWN

Stanford scientists have designed a copper catalyst that produces ethanol from carbon dioxide and water.

Most cars and trucks in the United States run on a blend of 90 percent gasoline and 10 percent ethanol, a renewable fuel made primarily from fermented corn. But to produce the 14 billion gallons of ethanol consumed annually by American drivers requires millions of acres of farmland.

A recent discovery by Stanford University scientists could lead to a new, more sustainable way to make ethanol without corn or other crops. This promising technology has three basic components: water, carbon dioxide and electricity delivered through a copper catalyst. The results are published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

“One of our long-range goals is to produce renewable ethanol in a way that doesn’t impact the global food supply,” said study principal investigator Thomas Jaramillo, an associate professor of chemical engineering at Stanford and of photon science at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.

Scientists would like to design copper catalysts that selectively convert carbon dioxide into higher-value chemicals and fuels, like ethanol and propanol, with few or no byproducts. But first they need a clear understanding of how these catalysts actually work. That’s where the recent findings come in.

Copper crystals

For the PNAS study, the Stanford team chose three samples of crystalline copper, known as copper (100), copper (111) and copper (751). Scientists use these numbers to describe the surface geometries of single crystals.

“Copper (100), (111) and (751) look virtually identical but have major differences in the way their atoms are arranged on the surface,” said Christopher Hahn, an associate staff scientist at SLAC and co-lead lead author of the study. “The essence of our work is to understand how these different facets of copper affect electrocatalytic performance.”

In previous studies, scientists had created single-crystal copper electrodes just 1-square millimeter in size.

“With such a small crystal, it’s hard to identify and quantify the molecules that are produced on the surface,” Hahn explained. “This leads to difficulties in understanding the chemical reactions, so our goal was to make larger copper electrodes with the surface quality of a single crystal.”

To create bigger samples, Hahn and his co-workers at SLAC developed a novel way to grow single crystal-like copper on top of large wafers of silicon and sapphire.

“What Chris did was amazing,” Jaramillo said. “He made films of copper (100), (111) and (751) with 6-square centimeter surfaces. That’s 600 times bigger than typical single crystals.

Catalytic performance

To compare electrocatalytic performance, the researchers placed the three large electrodes in water, exposed them to carbon dioxide gas and applied a potential to generate an electric current.

The results were clear. When a specific voltage was applied, the electrodes made of copper (751) were far more selective to liquid products, such as ethanol and propanol, than those made of copper (100) or (111). The explanation may lie in the different ways that copper atoms are aligned on the three surfaces.

“In copper (100) and (111), the surface atoms are packed close together, like a square grid and a honeycomb, respectively” Hahn said. “As a result, each atom is bonded to many other atoms around it, and that tends to make the surface more inert.”

But in copper (751), the surface atoms are further apart.

“An atom of copper (751) only has two nearest neighbors,” Hahn said. “But an atom that isn’t bonded to other atoms is quite unhappy, and that makes it want to bind stronger to incoming reactants like carbon dioxide. We believe this is one of the key factors that lead to better selectivity to higher-value products, like ethanol and propanol.”

Ultimately, the Stanford team would like to develop a technology capable of selectively producing carbon-neutral fuels and chemicals at an industrial scale.

“The eye on the prize is to create better catalysts that have game-changing potential by taking carbon dioxide as a feedstock and converting it into much more valuable products using renewable electricity or sunlight directly,” Jaramillo said. “We plan to use this method on nickel and other metals to further understand the chemistry at the surface. We think this study is an important piece of the puzzle and will open up whole new avenues of research for the community.”

Read more at ScienceDaily

via Climate Change Dispatch http://ift.tt/2jXMFWN

June 20, 2017 at 02:04PM

Sustainable ethanol from carbon dioxide? A possible path

Sustainable ethanol from carbon dioxide? A possible path

via Principia Scientific International
http://ift.tt/1kjWLPW

Most cars and trucks in the United States run on a blend of 90 percent gasoline and 10 percent ethanol, a renewable fuel made primarily from fermented corn. But to produce the 14 billion gallons of ethanol consumed annually by American drivers requires millions of acres of farmland. A recent discovery by Stanford University scientists […]

Click title above to read the full article

via Principia Scientific International http://ift.tt/1kjWLPW

June 20, 2017 at 01:52PM