Category: Uncategorized

Australian Coal War Threatens To Overthrow Green Climate Consensus

Australian Coal War Threatens To Overthrow Green Climate Consensus

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF)
http://www.thegwpf.com

Liberal Party conservatives are demanding Malcolm Turnbull allow so-called clean coal to qualify as a low emissions fuel and be eligible for incentives if he wants party room support to implement a Clean Energy Target.

The moves put hopes of bipartisan support for the Finkel review and an end to the climate wars in doubt because Labor, which is prepared to drop its support for a more robust emissions intensity scheme and negotiate a CET, will not back the coal demand.

After former prime minister Tony Abbott hit out on Monday, labelling the CET advocated by Chief Scientist Alan Finkel as a “magic pudding” and a “tax on coal”, shadow energy minister Mark Butler demanded the Prime Minister rein in the rebels.

“If Malcolm Turnbull doesn’t pull his party room into line, pretty quickly, he’s going to completely lose control of this process before it even begins,” he said.

Tony Abbott labelling the CET advocated by Chief Scientist Alan Finkel as a "magic pudding" and a "tax on coal".
Tony Abbott labelling the CET advocated by Chief Scientist Alan Finkel as a “magic pudding” and a “tax on coal”. Andrew Meares

In an interview with The Australian Financial Review, Dr Finkel said a CET placed no prohibition on coal but during the preparation of his report, the modelling showed there was little investment appetite for coal-fired power because the economics did not stack up.

 “In our model, we allowed for the possibility but none of them came in, purely on economic grounds,” he said.

Dr Finkel also defended his work from attacks by conservatives, including Senator Eric Abetz, who accused him of using dodgy modelling to back his claim that a CET was the best option in terms of lower power prices. It would have slightly more effect than an emissions intensity scheme in lowering prices and would make power about $90 a year cheaper than the current approach of doing nothing.

“I’m as confident as I can be but I do realise that models are as good as the assumptions on which they are based,” he said.

“We tried to be extremely open. We tried to be as open as we can, as thoughtful as we can.”

Chief Scientist Dr Alan Finkel's review of the electricity market promises lower prices under a Clean Energy Target.
Chief Scientist Dr Alan Finkel’s review of the electricity market promises lower prices under a Clean Energy Target. Alex Ellinghausen

He said, for example, that the business as usual scenario was based on currently legislated policies and “sensible” interest rates “and we did not assume we would be saved by commercially unproven technology”. These include geothermal technology and carbon capture and storage, which other studies have claimed will be producing up to 40 per cent of power by 2050.

In a report to government on Friday, Dr Finkel recommended a CET be adopted after 2020 to ensure a stable transition towards cleaner energy sources while Australia still met its Paris agreement of reducing emissions by 26 per cent to 28 per cent on 2005 levels by 2030.

Full post

via The Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF) http://www.thegwpf.com

June 12, 2017 at 08:25AM

The 9th Circus is back with another ban on the Travel Ban

The 9th Circus is back with another ban on the Travel Ban

via Defeat Climate Alarmism
https://defyccc.com

From the today’s 9th Circuit Appeals Court decision: “We conclude that the President, in issuing the Executive Order, exceeded the scope of the authority delegated to him by Congress.”

President’s authority is defined in the Constitution.  It is not delegated by Congress.

“In suspending the entry of more than 180 million nationals from six countries, suspending the entry of all refugees, and reducing the cap on the admission of refugees from 110,000 to 50,000 for the 2017 fiscal year, the President did not meet the essential precondition to exercising his delegated authority …”

President exercises authority he has under Constitution.  And does the Court really want entry of 180 million nationals from Iran, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen?

Executive Order 13780 is a softened version of Executive Order 13769, which had been illegally stricken down by the same Court.

via Defeat Climate Alarmism https://defyccc.com

June 12, 2017 at 08:10AM

Denmark is killing Tesla

Denmark is killing Tesla

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

Denmark is killing Tesla (translation – electric car sales plummet after Denmark cuts subsidies)

http://ift.tt/2rxkRzY

Now who would have guessed it!

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT http://ift.tt/16C5B6P

June 12, 2017 at 07:48AM

Standing up to the G-7 Climate Bully!

Standing up to the G-7 Climate Bully!

via Watts Up With That?
http://ift.tt/1Viafi3

What’s the best way to deal with a bully?  Punch him (or her) in the nose.  It appears that President Trump just punched the G-7 climate bully in the nose…

Isolating Trump

Merkel’s G-20 Climate Alliance Is Crumbling

The German chancellor had been hoping to isolate Donald Trump on climate issues at the upcoming G-20 summit in Hamburg. But Merkel’s hoped-for alliance is crumbling, underscoring Germany’s relative political weakness globally. Many countries are wary of angering the United States.

By Christiane Hoffmann, Peter Müller and Gerald Traufetter

June 09, 2017 06:49 PM

German Chancellor Angela Merkel had actually thought that Canada’s young, charismatic prime minister, Justin Trudeau, could be counted among her reliable partners. Particularly when it came to climate policy. Just two weeks ago, at the G-7 summit in Sicily, he had thrown his support behind Germany. When Merkel took a confrontational approach to U.S. President Donald Trump, Trudeau was at her side.

But by Tuesday evening, things had changed. At 8 p.m., Merkel called Trudeau to talk about how to proceed following Trump’s announced withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement. To her surprise, the Canadian prime minister was no longer on the attack. He had switched to appeasement instead.

What would be wrong with simply striking all mentions of the Paris Agreement from the planned G-20 statement on climate, Trudeau asked. He suggested simply limiting the statement to energy issues, something that Trump would likely support as well. Trudeau had apparently changed his approach to Trump and seemed concerned about further provoking his powerful neighbor to the south.

The telephone call made it clear to Merkel that her strategy for the G-20 summit in early July might fail. The chancellor had intended to clearly isolate the United States. at the Hamburg meeting, hoping that 19 G-20 countries would underline their commitment to the Paris Agreement and make Trump a bogeyman of world history. A score of 19:1.

[…]

From the G-6 to the G-3

But even before Trump announced the American withdrawal from the Paris Agreement that evening in the White House Rose Garden, it had become clear in Berlin that they would miss their first target. Led by the Italian G-7 presidency, the plan had been for a joint reaction to Trump’s withdrawal, an affirmation from the remaining six leading industrial nations: We remain loyal to Paris.

Suddenly, though, Britain and Japan no longer wanted to be part of it. British Prime Minister Theresa May didn’t want to damage relations with Trump, since she would need him in the event of a hard Brexit, the Chancellery surmised last week. And given the tensions with North Korea, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe couldn’t put his country’s alliance with the U.S. at risk. In other words: Climate policy is great, but when it comes to national interests, it is secondary.

[…]

It is a defeat for Merkel, and not just when it comes to climate policy. It is also a setback for her claim to leadership on the global stage. Germany’s geopolitical influence, the incident shows, remains limited. When it comes to power, security and interests, Germany is a not a global player, but a mid-sized power that isn’t even able to keep Europe together.

[…]

Hope Fades

In parallel, though, Merkel’s advisers are working on an “Action Plan on Climate, Energy and Growth,” a document that had initially been planned for the 19 in Merkel’s original 19:1 calculation. But hope is fading that enough heads of state and government can be found to sign the document.

[…]

There are widespread concerns that a whole list of countries might pull back out of fear of the consequences for their relations with Trump – something they aren’t willing to risk over the question as to how hot it might be on the planet in 100 years. Indeed, the Chancellery has begun recalibrating its view of success, now content to settle for a situation in which no other country joins the U.S. in withdrawing from the Paris Agreement.

[…]

Ultimately, the end result could be that the issue is largely ignored. The G-20 isn’t a climate conference, officials are saying, and the conflicts might be better suited for the next global climate summit, scheduled to take place in Bonn at the end of the year.

The German population, of course, would almost certainly prefer to see the chancellor stand up to Trump. If Merkel, who has staked a significant portion of her political legacy on climate change, were to exclude climate from the G-20 summit, she could face accusations of caving in to the U.S. president.

[…]

Der Spiegel

Had Hillary Clinton won the Election last year, the G-20 would have been unanimous in their endorsement of  the Paris climate agreement.  Now, they can only count on three of the G-7 nations in their efforts to isolate the United States with a 19:1 G-20 climate proclamation.

via Watts Up With That? http://ift.tt/1Viafi3

June 12, 2017 at 07:12AM