Category: Uncategorized

TV weatherman goes off on climate skeptics: “put up or shut up”

TV weatherman goes off on climate skeptics: “put up or shut up”

via Watts Up With That?
http://ift.tt/1Viafi3

TV weatherman goes off on climate skeptics: “put up or shut up”

Greg Fischel, WRAL says on his Facebook page

Greg Fishel, WRAL-TV, Raleigh, NC

PUT UP OR SHUT UP

You know everybody reaches their breaking point and quite frankly I have reached mine with the folks who post all over the internet about the scientific fallacies of man induced climate change. All of them are guest bloggers or essayists. None of this stuff has ever been published in a peer reviewed atmospheric science or climate journal. But we live in an age today where higher education and research are no longer respected. Heck, think of all the money my parents wasted on my education when I could have waited for the age of twitter and Facebook and declared myself as an expert in the field of my choice. That’s sarcasm to illustrate asininity. But wait! Let’s say one of these guest essayers is a modern day Galileo, and has that critical piece to the puzzle that no other scientist has. Then they should submit their findings to one of the American Meteorological Society’s peer reviewed journals for publication. If they are rejected, and the author feels unfairly, then make public each and every one of the reviewers’ comments for the entire world to see. If there is bias and corruption in the peer review process, everyone needs to know about it so this flawed process can be halted and corrected. But ya know what? I doubt any of these folks has the guts to do this, and they’ll continue on with their pathetic excuse for science education. So prove me wrong bloggers and essayists. Submit your work the way real scientists do, and see where it takes you. Uncover that bias and corruption you’re so convinced is present. If you end up being correct, society will owe you a huge debt of gratitude. If you’re wrong, stop muddying the scientific waters with ideological trash.


Wow, I guess he doesn’t read beyond the AMS/BAMS much, because there are thousands of peer reviewed papers that question the claims of climate change.

Let’s help him out.

via Watts Up With That? http://ift.tt/1Viafi3

May 23, 2017 at 02:35AM

Understanding 99% Certainty Among Climate Scientists

Understanding 99% Certainty Among Climate Scientists

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

There is something fascinating about science.  One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.

  • Mark Twain

Thirty years ago, NASA’s top climate expert said he was 99% certain that the 1988 US drought was caused by the greenhouse effect.

10 Jul 1988, 29 – The Daily Spectrum

Droughts have become less common in the US over time, and there nothing particularly unusual about the 1988 drought.

Climate at a Glance | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)

Hansen later contradicted himself, but that is what 99% certain settled science is all about.

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

After decades of failed predictions, lies and junk science, Democrats recognize James Hansen as a prophet.

The Argus-Press – Google News Archive Search

via The Deplorable Climate Science Blog http://ift.tt/2i1JH7O

May 23, 2017 at 02:34AM

Study: weather patterns affect frost timing more than global warming

Study: weather patterns affect frost timing more than global warming

via Watts Up With That?
http://ift.tt/1Viafi3

From the UNIVERSITY OF UTAH

Weather patterns’ influence on frost timing

Air circulation affects frost more than global warming — for now

May 23, 2017– Gardeners know the frustration of a false spring. Coaxed outside by warm weather, some people plant their gardens in the spring only to see a sudden late frost strike at the plants with a killer freezer burn. Grumbling green thumbs, along with farmers and water supply managers, would benefit from more accurate predictions of the first and last frosts of the season.

This image shows the average day of the year with the last spring frost (left) and first fall frost (right). Cooler colors indicate an earlier day of the year. CREDIT Courtesy of Court Strong/University of Utah.

Such timing is in flux, however. The frost-free season in North America is approximately 10 days longer now than it was a century ago. In a new study, published today in Nature Communications, researchers from the University of Utah and the U.S. Geological Survey parse the factors contributing to the timing of frost in the United States. Atmospheric circulation patterns, they found, were the dominant influence on frost timing, although the trend of globally warming temperatures played a part as well.

“The frost-free season has been lengthening over the past century, and now we understand the changes in atmospheric circulation that are extremely strong in frost timing, even stronger than global warming,” says University of Utah atmospheric sciences professor Court Strong.

Weather and climate are complex systems, with many factors affecting what the particular weather conditions might be in a certain place at a certain time. Previous research, says Gregory McCabe, of the USGS in Denver has focused on the role of large-scale phenomena like El Niño. “I don’t think anyone has broken it down to look at the circulations patterns specific to the timing of frost,” McCabe says.

Strong and McCabe set out to investigate the relative contributions of the global warming trend and local atmospheric circulation patterns to the century-long lengthening of the frost-free season.

“If you ask a U.S. forecaster what determines the first fall frost, they’ll say a cold air mass coming down out of Canada, clearly due to circulation,” Strong says. “There’s a role for warming, but on the other hand forecasters will tell you there’s clearly a role for circulation as well.”

To more accurately capture regional, relatively small-scale circulation patterns, Strong and McCabe divided the United States into four regions, and examined separately how frost timing patterns varied in each region over 93 years of weather data.

The researchers found that atmospheric circulation patterns accounted for between 25 and 48 percent of the variation in frost timing. To put that in context, Strong says, remember that the frost-free season has lengthened by an average of 10 days over the past century. Three to five of those days can be accounted for by atmospheric circulation, while three days can be chalked up to global warming. Other factors, such as local cloud cover, may account for the remaining two to four days.

Although the results show that atmospheric circulation is the primary driver of frost timing, the warming trend exerts an influence over circulation beyond the general trend of warming temperatures. “We also found evidence that these circulation patterns themselves have been altered by global warming, especially in the Western U.S. and the Northwest,” Strong says. “Warming is an important part of this narrative despite this finding that circulation is a stronger driver historically.”

Next, Strong and McCabe will evaluate how well climate models capture the drivers of frost timing and look for ways the models can be improved. Better modeling of atmospheric patterns leads to more accurate forecast of future frost timing. “The year-to year variability in climate is controlled by these changes in atmospheric circulation,” McCabe says. “On top of that you have the warming trend. If you don’t get these patterns right then the simulations are going to have a lot of uncertainty in them.”

###

Full disclosure, the lead scientist used to be a roommate of mine, he’s a sensible and affable guy and former television meteorologist who worked at the same TV station as I did.

via Watts Up With That? http://ift.tt/1Viafi3

May 23, 2017 at 02:23AM

Why Are Global Warming Alarmists Afraid Of Nuclear Power?

Why Are Global Warming Alarmists Afraid Of Nuclear Power?

via Climate Change Dispatch
http://ift.tt/2jXMFWN

In the New York Times, David Leonhardt praises China and India for cutting carbon dioxide emissions, despite the fact that “Hundreds of millions of people in both China and India live in poverty, unable to afford basics—decent food, shelter, medical care, and education—that Westerners take for granted.” Pause here for a moment to reflect on […]

via Climate Change Dispatch http://ift.tt/2jXMFWN

May 23, 2017 at 02:07AM