By Paul Homewood
So the whole charade trundles on for another year:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c8jykpdgr08t
So, poor nations, who demanded $1.3 trillion, were eventually forced to accept $300 billion, a figure widely derided:
And India’s representative made it absolutely clear that the money would not alter her country’s energy policies:
But it is all academic anyway, as they won’t even get that much if the US pulls out, as expected to.
The UK’s share of $300bn, if averaged out by GDP, would be about $18 billion, or $36 billion if Trump pulls out, which is nearly three times the current Overseas Aid budget.
In all likelihood, most of the money will be provided, as now, by repayable loans and private sector investment. Neither of these are of much use for the Third World, as they cannot afford the repayments or the profits businesses will look to extract.
Needless to say, developing countries will not be obliged to cut emissions in return for their Danegeld. Back in the heady days of 2009, the naive Barack Obama believed that throwing dollar bills around would magically lower the world’s emissions. We now know the reality!
Nor is there any obligation for China, India or Middle Eastern oil states, all still classified as “developing”, to cough up a penny.
And more fundamentally, COP29 never even addressed the issue of emission reductions. No new pledges were made, no NDCs updated. No even a timetable for discussing them in future.
Perhaps the most ludicrous part of the Conference was the first day agreement on carbon markets.
As the BBC explain, a poor country with lots of trees can sell carbon credits to richer nations, so they can continue to burn fossil fuels.
Apparently carbon emissions are alright, as long as you pay a penance!
Meanwhile I look forward to Ed Miliband telling where Rachel from Accounts is going to find all the money he has signed away.
via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT
November 24, 2024 at 03:31AM
