WHO Warns Global Warming is Causing Dangerous Heat Stress

Essay by Eric Worrall

If only there was a way to avoid dangerous daytime temperature extremes.

WHO, WMO issue new report and guidance to protect workers from increasing heat stress

22 August 2025 
Joint News Release
Geneva

The World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) have published a new joint report and guidance highlighting the growing global health challenges posed by extreme heat on workers.

As climate change drives more frequent and intense heatwaves, many workers who are regularly exposed to dangerous heat conditions are already feeling the health impacts of rising temperatures, in particular, manual workers in sectors such as agriculture, construction and fisheries. Increasing heat episodes are also leading to health issues for vulnerable populations in developing countries, such as children, older adults and low-income populations.

“Heat stress is already harming the health and livelihoods of billions of workers, especially in the most vulnerable communities,” said Dr Jeremy Farrar, WHO Assistant Director-General, Health Promotion, Disease Prevention and Care. “This new guidance offers practical, evidence-based solutions to protect lives, reduce inequality, and build more resilient workforces in a warming world.”

The new report and technical guidance, entitled Climate change and workplace heat stress draws on five decades of research and evidence, highlighting that the health and productivity of workers are severely impacted by rising temperatures. WMO reports that 2024 was the hottest year on record. Daytime temperatures of more than 40°C and even above 50°C are becoming increasingly common, a clear indication that immediate action is needed to address the worsening impact of heat stress on workers worldwide.

“Occupational heat stress has become a global societal challenge, which is no longer confined to countries located close to equator – as highlighted by the recent heatwave in Europe,” said WMO Deputy Secretary-General Ko Barrett. “Protection of workers from extreme heat is not just a health imperative but an economic necessity.”

Key findings

The report and guidance outline key issues related with health impacts of extreme heat.

  • The frequency and intensity of extreme heat events have risen sharply, increasing risks for both outdoor and indoor workers.
  • Worker productivity drops by 2–3% for every degree above 20°C.
  • Health risks include heatstroke, dehydration, kidney dysfunction, and neurological disorders, all of which hinder long-term health and economic security.
  • Approximately half the global population suffers adverse consequences of high temperatures.

To tackle these challenges, the report calls for the implementation of occupational heat action plans, tailored to specific industries and regions, and developed in collaboration with employers, workers, unions, and public health experts.

Recommended actions

The guidance lays out a clear path for governments, employers, and health authorities to mitigate the growing risks of extreme heat on working populations. The recommended actions include:

  • Develop occupational heat-health policies with tailored plans and advisories that consider local weather patterns, specific jobs, and worker vulnerabilities;
  • Focus on vulnerable populations with special attention given to middle-aged and older workers, individuals with chronic health conditions, and those with lower physical fitness who can be more susceptible to the effects of heat stress;
  • Education and awareness raising for first responders, health professionals, employers, and workers to recognize and properly treat heat stress symptoms, which are often misdiagnosed;
  • Engage all stakeholders from workers and trade unions to health experts and local authorities in the co-creation of heat-health strategies that are locally relevant and widely supported.
  • Design solutions that are not only effective but also practical, affordable and environmentally sustainable, ensuring policies can be implemented at scale.
  • Embrace innovation by adopting technologies that can help safeguard health while maintaining productivity.
  • Support further research and evaluation to strengthen the effectiveness of occupational heat-health measures and ensure maximum protection for workers worldwide.

The report and technical guidance by WHO and WMO complement the findings of the recent International Labour Organization (ILO) reports which highlight that more than 2.4 billion workers are exposed to excessive heat globally, resulting in more than 22.85 million occupational injuries each year.

“This report represents a critical milestone in our collective response to the growing threat of extreme heat in the world of work,” said Joaquim Pintado Nunes, ILO’s Chief of Occupational Safety and Health and the Working Environment. “Aligned with the ILO’s mandate to promote safe and healthy working environments as a fundamental right, it offers robust, evidence-based guidance to help governments, employers and workers confront the escalating risks of climate change. Together with WHO and WMO, we call for urgent, coordinated action to safeguard the health, safety and dignity of the more than 2.4 billion workers exposed to excessive heat worldwide.”

Call to action

This guidance serves as a critical resource for policymakers, public health officials, and employers in mitigating the escalating impact of workplace heat stress. It aligns with key United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, calling for decisive actions that protect vulnerable workers, reduce poverty, and promote sustainable economic growth. Immediate implementation of policies and programmes that safeguard worker health and productivity in the face of climate change is essential.

In the context of accelerating climate crisis, this guidance serves as a vital tool to help countries respond decisively, protecting lives, livelihoods and economies from the growing threat of extreme heat

Media Contacts

WHO Media Team
World Health Organization 
Email: mediainquiries@who.int

WMO Media
World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 
Email: media@wmo.int

Source: https://www.who.int/news/item/22-08-2025-who-wmo-issue-new-report-and-guidance-to-protect-workers-from-increasing-heat-stress

Hilariously the press release page doesn’t appear to contain a link to the report, as of the time of writing this article. But I tracked down a copy on the WMO website.

I flipped through the report, but I won’t bother reproducing any of it here – the report itself seems as nonsensical as the press release. Unusually for a climate report it mentions the possibility of adaption – the report first acknowledges the possibility of working at night on page 42. If you do want to read the report I recommend downloading it and reading it locally on your computer via a button on the bottom left of their reader, their online PDF reader sucks.

Working at night, especially in industries like construction, is routine in the tropics, but there were plenty of other adaptions to excess heat which were developed before modern electric lighting. For example in Spain they have a long standing tradition of an afternoon Siesta, sleeping through the hottest part of the day.

In Australia we also have traditional ways of dealing with the heat.

The following comedy advertisement from a decade ago upholds our proud Aussie tradition of heat adaption, watch it to the end, it isn’t what it seems.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/4dWBGxy

August 23, 2025 at 12:01PM

Surplus Arctic Ice late August 2025

After a sub-par March maximum, by end of May 2025 Arctic ice closed the gap with the 19-year average. Then in June the gap reopened and in July the melting pace matched the average, abeit four days in advance of average. In mid-August MASIE showed the Arctic ice extent matching the 19-year average. Now with a week to go Arctic ice has been above average for the last five days, by over +200k km2 yesterday.

During August the average year loses 1.9M km2 of ice extent.  MASIE on day 213 was 308k km2 down, and the gap closed steadily, going into surplus on day 230. Note 2020 and 2024 were well  below average mid-August.  2024 ended nearly average, while 2020 went down almost off the chart. Meanwhile SII v.4 started August ~400k km2 lower than MASIE, increasing to 600k km2 yesterday.  More on what happened to SII in footnote.

The regional distribution of ice extents is shown in the table below. (Bering and Okhotsk seas are excluded since both are now virtually open water.)

Region 2025234 Ave. Day 234 2025-Ave. 2020234 2025-2020
 (0) Northern_Hemisphere 5665223 5452280 212942 4947191 718032
 (1) Beaufort_Sea 912878 636530 276349 802063 110815
 (2) Chukchi_Sea 456078 382204 73873 382512 73565
 (3) East_Siberian_Sea 597683 465057 132626 248241 349443
 (4) Laptev_Sea 210514 216232 -5718 36330 174184
 (5) Kara_Sea 3533 70094 -66561 23616 -20083
 (6) Barents_Sea 0 18103 -18103 342 -342
 (7) Greenland_Sea 124456 195018 -70562 227692 -103236
 (8) Baffin_Bay_Gulf_of_St._Lawrence 63370 40548 22822 13063 50308
 (9) Canadian_Archipelago 371460 348507 22954 356783 14677
 (10) Hudson_Bay 21111 34968 -13858 35329 -14218
 (11) Central_Arctic 2902590 3043900 -141310 2820550 82040

The table shows large surpluses in Eurasian basins  Beaufort, Chukchi and E. Siberiano more than offsetting deficits in Central Arctic, Kara and Greenland seas. Hudson Bay is mostly open water at this time of year. 2025 exceeds the average ice extents by 212k km2, or 4%, and is 718k km2 greater than 2020, or 0.7 Wadhams of ice extent.

Why is this important?  All the claims of global climate emergency depend on dangerously higher  temperatures, lower sea ice, and rising sea levels.  The lack of additional warming prior to 2023 El Nino is documented in a post SH Drives UAH Temps Cooler July 2025.

The lack of acceleration in sea levels along coastlines has been discussed also.  See Observed vs. Imagined Sea Levels 2023 Update

Also, a longer term perspective is informative:

post-glacial_sea_level

Footnote Regarding  SII v.4

NSDIC acknowledged my query regarding the SII (Sea Ice Index) dataset. While awaiting an explanation I investigated further. My last download of the SII Daily Arctic Ice Extents was on July 30, meaning that the most recent data in that file was day 210, July 29. The header on that file was Sea_Ice_Index_Daily_Extent_G02135_v3.

Then on August 1, the downloaded file had the heading Sea_Ice_Index_Daily_Extent_G02135_v4. So it appears that these are now the values from a new version of SII. As I wrote in my query, since March 14 all of the values for Arctic Ice Extents are lower in this new record. The graph above shows the implications for August as an example of estimates from SIIv.4

The change started in January 2025 and will be the basis for future reporting.  The logic for this is presented in this document: Sea Ice Index Version 4 Analysis

In June 2025, NSIDC was informed that access to data from the Special Sensor Microwave
Imager/Sounder (SSMIS) onboard the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP)
satellites would end on July 31 (NSIDC, 2025). To prepare for this, we rapidly developed version
4 of the Sea Ice Index. This new version transitions from using sea ice concentration fields
derived from SSMIS data as input to using fields derived from the Advanced Microwave
Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) sensor onboard the Global Change Observation Mission – W1
(GCOM-W1) satellite.  On 29 July 2025, we learned that the Defense Department decision to terminate access to DMSP data had been reversed and that data will continue to be available until September 2026.

We are publishing Version 4, however, for these reasons:

• The SSMIS instruments are well past their designed lifespan and a transition to
AMSR2 is inevitable. Unless the sensors fail earlier, the DoD will formally end the
program in September 2026.
• Although access of SSMIS will continue through September 2026, the Fleet
Numerical Meteorology and Oceanography Center (FNMOC), where SSMIS data
from the DMSP satellite are downloaded, made an announcement that “Support
will be on a best effort basis and should be considered data of opportunity.” This
means that SSMIS data will likely contain data gaps.
• We have developer time to make this transition now and may not in the future.
• We are confident that Version 4 data are commensurate in accuracy to those
provided by Version 3.

 

via Science Matters

https://ift.tt/EhYzR5D

August 23, 2025 at 10:10AM

Sunday

0 out of 10 based on 0 rating

via JoNova

https://ift.tt/2m451nD

August 23, 2025 at 09:24AM

Natural Gas Price Trends

From NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

By Paul Homewood

It is a general consensus nowadays that gas prices are “high” and this is why electricity prices are also “high”.

But exactly how “high” are natural gas prices?

https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/news-and-insight/data/data-portal/wholesale-market-indicators

We all know of course that natural gas prices spiked just before the Ukraine war started, but they also fell back rapidly during the following 12 months or so.

In June this year, according to OFGEM, wholesale gas prices were 86.28p/therm, compared to 46.10p in January 2015, an increase of 87%. But we have also had something called inflation in the last ten years. Since January 2015, RPI has risen by 58%, so the real increase is much smaller than supposed:

https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/inflationandpriceindices/timeseries/chaw/mm23

The following chart takes out the inflationary effect and shows some very interesting results:

As we can see, real prices this year are no higher than they were in 2018.

As with all commodities, gas prices are always volatile, following the vagaries of supply and demand. Prices fell sharply in 2015 and 2016 as a result of a glut of supply. You may recall the price spikes between 2012 and 2014 when demand exceeded supply. That led to wells reopening and a glut, the seemingly never ending cycle we see in markets like oil and mining.

Prices obviously dipped to ridiculously low levels during COVID lockdowns as demand evaporated.

But ignoring COVID and Ukraine, current gas prices are not excessive by historical standards, and therefore cannot explain why electricity prices are so high now.

Tomorrow I’ll do the same exercise with electricity markets.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/H9T7uAI

August 23, 2025 at 08:06AM