UAH Global Temperature Update for September, 2024: +0.96 deg. C

The Version 6 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for September, 2024 was +0.96 deg. C departure from the 1991-2020 mean, up from the August, 2024 anomaly of +0.88 deg. C.

The linear warming trend since January, 1979 remains at +0.16 C/decade (+0.14 C/decade over the global-averaged oceans, and +0.21 C/decade over global-averaged land).

The following table lists various regional LT departures from the 30-year (1991-2020) average for the last 21 months (record highs are in red):

YEAR MO GLOBE NHEM. SHEM. TROPIC USA48 ARCTIC AUST
2023 Jan -0.04 +0.05 -0.13 -0.38 +0.12 -0.12 -0.50
2023 Feb +0.09 +0.17 +0.00 -0.10 +0.68 -0.24 -0.11
2023 Mar +0.20 +0.24 +0.17 -0.13 -1.43 +0.17 +0.40
2023 Apr +0.18 +0.11 +0.26 -0.03 -0.37 +0.53 +0.21
2023 May +0.37 +0.30 +0.44 +0.40 +0.57 +0.66 -0.09
2023 June +0.38 +0.47 +0.29 +0.55 -0.35 +0.45 +0.07
2023 July +0.64 +0.73 +0.56 +0.88 +0.53 +0.91 +1.44
2023 Aug +0.70 +0.88 +0.51 +0.86 +0.94 +1.54 +1.25
2023 Sep +0.90 +0.94 +0.86 +0.93 +0.40 +1.13 +1.17
2023 Oct +0.93 +1.02 +0.83 +1.00 +0.99 +0.92 +0.63
2023 Nov +0.91 +1.01 +0.82 +1.03 +0.65 +1.16 +0.42
2023 Dec +0.83 +0.93 +0.73 +1.08 +1.26 +0.26 +0.85
2024 Jan +0.86 +1.06 +0.66 +1.27 -0.05 +0.40 +1.18
2024 Feb +0.93 +1.03 +0.83 +1.24 +1.36 +0.88 +1.07
2024 Mar +0.95 +1.02 +0.88 +1.35 +0.23 +1.10 +1.29
2024 Apr +1.05 +1.25 +0.85 +1.26 +1.02 +0.98 +0.48
2024 May +0.90 +0.98 +0.83 +1.31 +0.38 +0.38 +0.45
2024 June +0.80 +0.96 +0.64 +0.93 +1.65 +0.79 +0.87
2024 July +0.85 +1.02 +0.68 +1.06 +0.77 +0.67 +0.01
2024 Aug +0.88 +0.96 +0.81 +0.88 +0.69 +0.94 +1.80
2024 Sep +0.96 +1.21 +0.71 +0.97 +1.56 +1.54 +1.16

The full UAH Global Temperature Report, along with the LT global gridpoint anomaly image for September, 2024, and a more detailed analysis by John Christy, should be available within the next several days here.

Lower Troposphere:

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/tlt/uahncdc_lt_6.0.txt

Mid-Troposphere:

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/tmt/uahncdc_mt_6.0.txt

Tropopause:

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/ttp/uahncdc_tp_6.0.txt

Lower Stratosphere:

http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/tls/uahncdc_ls_6.0.txt

via Roy Spencer, PhD.

https://ift.tt/XT3mf46

October 2, 2024 at 06:58AM

Germany Risks being Left behind…Big Tech Confirms CO2 Neutrality Only Possible With Nuclear Power

From the NoTricksZone

By P Gosselin

Germany’s green movement was propelled mainly by activists opposed to nuclear power in the 1980s and 90s. Since then, Germany has shut down its entire fleet of nuclear power reactors and is struggling to keep the lights on with renewable energy, mainly wind and sun.

Today German activists are focused on shutting down the remaining fossil fuel power, which in a normal world would make nuclear power attractive again. But not for the fundamentalist enviro-nutjobs. However, they may need to give in if they want to continue enjoying the amenities of the modern digital world and smartphones.

Blackout News here reports. “After Oracle and Microsoft, Google also plans to power its data centers with nuclear power.” apparently, wind and sun just don’t make the grade. CO2-neutrality just won’t be possible without nuclear power.

“Google’s leadership confirms the company is working on large-scale data centers that require over 1 gigawatt of electricity. Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google and Alphabet, spoke last week at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh about the potential use of small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) for power generation,” reports Blackout News, citing powermag.

According to reports, Google is currently forming a team to research alternative energies without CO₂ emissions and plans to use small modular nuclear reactors to power its AI data centers.

“We are now working on data centers with over 1 gigawatt of power. Two years ago, we wouldn’t have imagined that, and all of that requires energy,” said Pichai in Pittsburgh.

Today, many of Google’s data centers operate on a basis of about 90 percent CO2-free. But 100% won’t be possible without nuclear, it appears.

Pichai said he sees money going into SMRs …for nuclear energy and that he’s optimistic about the medium to long term energy needs being met.

As AI expands, so is the interest in data centers, which require enormous amounts of power to operate. Oracle CEO Larry Ellison plans to invest more than 10 billion dollars in building data centers and Microsoft aims to restart the reactor at the decommissioned Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania to meet the energy requirements for AI.

“Microsoft last week said it wants to restart a reactor at the shuttered Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania to power its AI needs. The company in January said a demonstration project in Wyoming, as part of a collaboration with Caterpillar and Ballard Power, showed how hydrogen fuel cells can provide power for a data center,” reports powermag here.

Amazon Web Services plans to buy power from the 2.5-GW Susquehanna nuclear plant for its nearby data center campus.

Big Tech’s move to nuclear energy to power its data centers show that green energies like wind and sun alone cannot meet the energy needs of our modern digital world.

Read entire article at powermag.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/ewLWHXM

October 2, 2024 at 04:06AM

CFACT helps light up Cape May beach to save whales

The Cairn lighting was done in a show of solidarity with other “anti-wind, save the whale” activities taking place during the same time in Norway and Scotland.

via CFACT

https://ift.tt/avxDSeJ

October 2, 2024 at 03:43AM

Can a survey of climate scientist opinions on future temperatures be called a study?

Paris Agreement
This article is headed: ‘Most climate scientists foresee temperature rise exceeding Paris Agreement targets, study finds’. Publishing a study about what people – IPCC scientists in this instance – foresee seems an odd concept, but it serves as another excuse to promote catastrophism, which is probably the main point of it in the run-up to COP29.
– – –
A new survey of climate experts reveals that a majority believe the Earth to be headed for a rise in global temperatures far higher than the 2015 Paris Agreement targets of 1.5 to well-below 2°C, says Phys.org.

The study was published in Communications Earth & Environment. It also shows that two-thirds of respondents—all of them authors on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)—believe we may succeed in achieving net zero CO2 emissions during the second half of this century.

This indicates some optimism that mitigation efforts may be starting to bend the emissions curve toward what would be needed to achieve the Paris temperature goal.

A majority also acknowledged the potential for atmospheric CO2 removal, with a median response indicating a belief that the technology could remove up to five gigatons of carbon dioxide (GtCO2) a year by 2050. That is at the lower end of the range believed to be necessary to meet the Paris targets.

“We wanted to survey some of the top climate experts in the world to get some insight into their perceptions of different future climate outcomes,” says the paper’s lead author, Seth Wynes, a former postdoctoral fellow at Concordia, now an assistant professor at the University of Waterloo.

“These scientists also engage in important climate change communication, so their optimism or pessimism can affect how decisionmakers are receiving messages about climate change.”

More is needed to avert catastrophe
The 211 respondents to the survey were generally pessimistic about reaching the Paris targets given current policies, with 86% estimating warming above 2˚C by 2100. The median estimate was 2.7˚C, which is expected to have catastrophic consequences for the planet.

Full article here.

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/twn4do2

October 2, 2024 at 03:41AM