CO2 Sustains Greenhouse Farming Revolution

By Vijay Jayaraj

The world would be safer if industrial emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) were stopped, according to the teachings of many schools, the regulatory schemes of some governments and the hyperbolic public relations campaigns of a climate industrial complex. But the truth is happier: CO2 is an irreplaceable plant food that is increasing.

Carbon dioxide – the gas branded as public enemy number one – is not destroying the planet. It’s enhancing life on it. Across the globe, elevated CO2 levels are supercharging plant growth and delivering bountiful crop harvests at unprecedented rates. 

Why does this matter? Because future generations could benefit from rejecting the hysteria and embracing common sense and well-established facts.

Since the start of the 20th century, atmospheric CO2 has risen from around 300 parts per million (ppm) to over 420 ppm. If you believe some headlines, this is tantamount to a death sentence. But if you’re a farmer – or a scientist focused on plant physiology – this increase looks like a gift. 

Studies show that crops such as tomatoes, cucumbers, lettuce and grains grow faster and yield more under higher CO2 concentrations. This phenomena has been verified by observations of plants in the world at large and in controlled environments over many decades. 

People taking advantage of this knowledge have contributed to an agricultural revolution. From Israel’s Negev Desert to Kenya’s Rift Valley, farmers are proving that CO2 is not a villain but an ally in feeding a growing population. 

Greenhouse Boom: Food Where There Was None 

Greenhouse farming employs tent-like structures with controlled environments to grow crops. Unlike open-field agriculture, which is susceptible to the risks of weather and pests, greenhouses provide stable ecosystems that extend growing seasons and manage lighting and temperature. In addition, greenhouses can artificially elevate CO2 to levels two or three time higher than ambient atmospheric concentrations. 

These farmers achieve what nature cannot – predictable, abundant harvests in deserts, tundra and urban sprawl. The benefits include lower water use, reduced reliance on pesticides, year-round production and higher yields.

In a study, researchers assessed the proliferation of greenhouse farming in 119 countries, including 22 in Africa. Greenhouses now cover more than 5,000 square miles of land worldwide, 40 times the agricultural area under cover four decades ago.

China has 60% of the world’s greenhouse farms. Some of the largest are in Weifang, China, (82,155 hectares) and Almeria, Spain (35,117 hectares). 

CO2-enriched greenhouses now supply a significant portion of urban vegetable demand in China, a country once plagued by food shortages and famine. “Rice, cucumbers, eggplants, and tomatoes provide off-season supply to the whole country,” says Chinese researcher Xiaoye Tong.

In the Hotan Prefecture of the Xinjiang desert, farmers grow tomatoes, cucumbers, and melons in greenhouses having CO2 levels up to 1,200 ppm, triple the outdoor concentration. 

Greenhouses in this region have enabled the development of fast-breeding rice, reducing the growth cycle to just 75 days by leveraging vertical soil-less cultivation and artificial light control. The Desert Greenhouse Project in Xinjiang’s Shawan Oasis has over 2,100 units that can produce annually about 19,000 tons of vegetables and fruits in more than 30 varieties. 

“The rate of expansion is the most dramatic in China, but the increase is a global phenomenon,” says Tong. For example, India’s greenhouse horticultural sector is growing by more than 6% annually. India’s government is fueling this growth through subsidies under the National Horticulture Mission, which covers up to 50% of setup costs. 

The Metrolina Greenhouses in Huntersville, North Carolina, consists of 8 million square feet of heated indoor growing space, making it the largest single-site, heated greenhouse in the U.S.

In Spain, Novagric built the largest single-module greenhouses that cultivate high-yield tomato plants. Production rose from 21 kilograms of tomatoes per square meter to a record 30 kilograms of cherry tomatoes, and the yield is expected to continue rising. 

You don’t need a Ph.D. to see through the haze. Ask yourself: If CO2 is so harmful, why do farmers pump it into greenhouses? Why are crop yields breaking records as CO2 levels rise? The answers are in biology, not ideology.

Plants evolved when CO2 levels were five times higher than today. CO2 emissions from the burning of fossil fuels are restoring the carbon dioxide that was removed from the atmosphere when coal, oil and natural gas were formed from the remains of flora and fauna in swamps and seas millions of years ago. A deficiency of atmospheric carbon dioxide is being rectified.

In the meantime, greenhouse farming, fueled by this life-giving molecule, will be part of a promising future free of hunger.

Vijay Jayaraj is a Science and Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Fairfax, Virginia. He holds an M.S. in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, both in the U.K., and a bachelor’s in engineering from Anna University, India.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/UBLDxh1

July 1, 2025 at 12:05PM

Berlin Moves To Ban Autos From Inside The City. Widespread Chaos Looms

Just 12 car trips person per year would be allowed!

The Berlin Constitutional Court has declared the “Berlin car-free” referendum admissible, paving the way for a possible drastic reduction in car traffic.

Hat-tip: Blackout News

Cars may soon be banned in Berlin. Image generated by Grok 3 AI 

The court found that the aim of promoting health and climate protection is a legitimate legislative objective and that the draft does not violate fundamental rights.

There is no constitutional right to individual road use.

The initiative aims for a car-free Berlin center in which private car trips would be limited to just twelve per person per year. Exceptions would be for police, emergency services and people with mobility impairments. Delivery traffic and special cases such as services would be able to be approved digitally. The proponents argue that the aim is not to replace combustion engines with electric cars, but to reduce the total number of vehicles around the city center.

“We have won, right down the line: the future of Berlin belongs to safety, climate protection and the health of all Berliners – and not to unrestrained car traffic,” said the Volksentscheid Berlin autofrei (Referendum Berlin car-free) in a statement.

170,000 signatures needed for a referendum

Next, the initiative must collect 170,000 signatures within four months in order to bring about a binding referendum.

The initiative, however, faces opposition from various groups. Business associations, such as the Association of Business Associations in Berlin and Brandenburg (UVB), have warned that a widespread car ban would be a severe blow to the economy in the capital region. They fear reduced customer access, especially for businesses that rely on delivery services or customers traveling by car.

There are also concerns that restricting car use would interfere with property rights, as car owners within the affected zone would be limited in how they could use their vehicles near their homes. Many residents and businesses rely on cars for their daily commutes, deliveries, and other activities. The proposed restrictions, allowing only 12 private car trips per person per year within the city’s S-Bahn ring.

Critics also point to the current state of public transport infrastructure, expressing concerns about “significant bottlenecks” and overcrowding if a large number of car users switch to public transport. While Berlin has an extensive public transport network, it probably isn’t robust enough to handle such a massive shift.

The current conservative-led Senate under Mayor Kai Wegner (CDU) has actively opposed traffic reduction policies, campaigning against bicycle lane expansion, speed limits, and parking reductions. Residents should be able to choose their mode of transport, including cars.

While the court has deemed the initiative legally permissible, there remains a number of hurdles, including a potential referendum. Past experiences with referendums in Berlin show that implementation can be challenging due to political resistance.

There are also questions about how the 12-trip limit per person would be enforced, raising concerns about bureaucracy and data privacy.

Donate – choose an amount

via NoTricksZone

https://ift.tt/IRMWngJ

July 1, 2025 at 10:28AM

Weybourne WMO03488 – Class 1 Excellence or a suspect performer?

52.94940 1.12229 Met Office CIMO Assessed Class 1 Installed 1/1/1986

Weybourne is a primary weather site run by the University of East Anglia who are home to the (in)famous Climate Research Unit. I have been intending to review this site for a long time as instinct suggested to me there was something just “not quite right” about it but could not put my finger on it. And then reader Dave Ward (a regular imagery contributor) added his expertise which suddenly allowed everything to slot into place. Is Weybourne really Class 1 or is it a suspect site – here is the Talkshop evidence.

Tim Channon reviewed this one back in 2012 and whilst he felt Class 1 by site measurement and general vista he did express elements of reservation about tracks and the like in the area. In notes on his review and other sites he noted an occasional “spikiness” to readings at certain sites with Weybourne being one.

When I reviewed nearby Holbeach I also noted an unexplained spikiness that I could not pin down and started a “back burner” period of keeping an eye out for future recurrences to find a possible cause.

Weybourne is a major atmospheric research centre and probably one of the best equipped Met Office sites in the UK. The site does offer guided tours for those interested in such detail but is not something that could be described as a tourist attraction in any way. It is a retired RAF site but I gave no consideration to what remained of the aviation facilities which were originally mainly air defense emplacements and a grass landing strip. Curiously the Stevenson screen and more mundane instruments are about 110 metres from the main equipment but there was no close up imagery.

And then Dave Ward forwarded me some more excellent photography this time for Cromer weather station for further site analysis and was also able to offer his local knowledge to issues surrounding the two (yes, two) sites named Santon Downham in two different counties!

I asked him if he could assist with any imagery or opinions on Weybourne……I struck Gold.

Morning, Ray.

I hadn’t realised the screen was so close to the runway. If its using fast responding electronic sensors I now feel it could be influenced by aircraft movements – let me explain: It may not that obvious but the longest (main) runway, 16/34 slopes, downhill towards the beach. Not a great slope – I make it about 2% using Google Earth – but enough to be a major consideration in take off & landing, particularly for heavier or low powered aircraft. You also have to consider the terrain on the respective approaches – there’s nothing but sea to the North, but the other end has Muckleburgh Hill to contend with. One is always taught to take off and land into wind, which is fine in ideal circumstances with flat runways, but that doesn’t apply here. With an offshore breeze only those with a really powerful machine would take off to the the South and climb straight ahead – getting airborne and then immediately banking left is the only option, and even this is not without some risk. From my own experience (and observations) the majority land uphill and take off downhill. The latter would be the most likely to affect the screen as they would naturally be using full power (and wishing for more!), while typically be getting off the ground about the time they pass it. The heat produced by a 150-250hp flat four isn’t remotely comparable to the turbofans on a big jet, but wing tip vortices are greatest at low speeds and high angles of attack, exactly what applies on take off and the final stages of landing.

Most pilots never experience just how powerful these can be, but I have and lived to tell the tale! I once got a bit too close behind another similar microlight, and suddenly found myself being rolled sharply one way then back the other, before normal flight resumed. Fortunately, I was not close to the ground or I wouldn’t be typing this. Microlights usually get off the ground very quickly, and light helicopters land and take off near the parking area, so it’s the bigger 4 – 5 seaters which need all the runway. If there’s any westerly component to the wind an uphill landing or downhill take off has a good probability of disturbing the air around the screen, and could account for at least some of the temperature “spikes” seen at Weybourne. Unfortunately, being a small airfield, there’s no “real time” online movements information to compare with. Visiting pilots are requested to “Book In” at the old caravan:”

I am certainly not about to question Dave’s expert experience! Together with lots of aerial imagery Dave supplied (from aircraft taking off and landing) I was able to locate the screen with exact reference to these movements. This link includes numerous images which include the screen and in the video it appears in remarkably close proximity to the aircraft visible from 15 to 18 seconds in the run. This still below to aid identification indicates the screen to the bottom left in the large enclosure.

This second video shows the aircraft touching down almost directly alongside the screen at 1 minute 5 seconds onwards.

https://www.mistralaviation.co.uk/Lunch_Landings/Weybourne/

Clearly at this stage this is currently no more than loose circumstantial evidence though Dave has kindly offered to collate some aircraft movement timings data for me to ultimately cross check with any potential readings spikes. However, I do find it very strange that the Met Office seems not to have considered this possibility given the known rapid reaction of modern PRTs as I detailed in my review of Lentran. Although this site has been a major site for a long time it is worth noting it was an “hourly obs” site for most of its history with trained observers taking hourly manual readings. This was not the same as the minute averaged continuous read outs of much more recent times from automated PRTs.

Pending the results of further findings, I am still not convinced this screen location fully meets Class 1 standard. In the modern era of very transient heat bursts being detected that earlier would not have been solely due to instrumentation change, coupled with a meteorological averaging system skewed to reporting of extremes, Weybourne could very easily be over recording by variable and largely unknown amounts solely based on the aviation activity.

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/3ZiU9aW

July 1, 2025 at 09:00AM

CFACT’s Donna Jackson to Congress: “Environmental justice agenda is a costly step in the wrong direction.”

"Families struggling with failing schools, drugs and high prices don’t want a government spending billions on solar panels, EV charging stations and bike paths." WATCH NOW

via CFACT

https://ift.tt/F65Uodj

July 1, 2025 at 08:28AM