Australia’s Net Zero Grid to Face Strict Government Price Controls

Essay by Eric Worrall

I wonder what happens next, when a government imposes more price fixing in the middle of a supply and affordability crisis?

Major electricity price crackdown confirmed ahead of $200 bill hike: ‘Reform is needed’

Energy Minister Chris Bowen will announce a review of the Default Market Offer system, which acts as a benchmark for what retailers can charge customers.

Tamika Seeto · Finance Reporter
Updated Wed 18 June 2025 at 9:54 am AEST 

Australian households could soon be spared from soaring power prices following a crackdown by the federal government. Energy Minister Chris Bowen is set to announce a review of the Default Market Offer (DMO) system as it looks to stamp out overcharging and price gouging.

Bowen will tell an energy industry conference today that the DMO system is not working and will be changed next year.

Bowen says the reforms will be designed to “get the best deal for consumers” and will bring the system more in line with that used in Victoria, where households will be hit with smaller hikes next month.

According to Canstar, this will translate to an average increase of up to $228 for NSW households, $77 for Queensland households and $71 for South Australian households.

Victoria, in comparison, will see an average increase of 1 per cent, with some consumers expected to see a price drop. Maximum prices are set by the state’s Essential Services Commission.

Read more: https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/major-electricity-price-crackdown-confirmed-ahead-of-200-bill-hike-reform-is-needed-235426451.html

Bringing the rest of Australia in line with Victoria threatens to spread Victoria’s grid management disaster to the entire East Coast of Australia. Victoria’s energy system is not working. Consumers in Victoria might have avoided paying market costs on this occasion, but power companies appear to be responding to Victoria’s price control squeeze by slashing power plant maintenance.

During last week’s green energy outage in Victoria, the problem was exacerbated because one of Victoria’s main coal plants was offline. The coal plant had literally started to fall to pieces (h/t RickWill).

Collapse at Yallourn Power Station leaves unit offline for weeks

Mon 9 Jun

In short: 

A unit at Yallourn Power Station will be offline for at least two weeks after an air duct collapsed.

It follows a report last month that showed Yallourn is the most unreliable of Gippsland’s power stations.

What’s next?

EnergyAustralia and WorkSafe are investigating the incident.

A unit at Yallourn Power Station in Victoria’s Latrobe Valley is expected to be offline for weeks after a huge air duct collapsed inside the facility on the weekend.

EnergyAustralia said it expected the unit to be offline for at least two weeks and it was investigating the incident “to ensure the integrity of similar equipment”.

A Victorian government spokesperson said there were no impacts to Victoria’s energy supply.

Victorian district president Andy Smith said the near-miss was a wake-up call to improve safety at aging coal plants.

“Luck was the only reason that no-one was injured or killed at Yallourn over the weekend,” he said.

It is unconscionable that the plant has reached the stage where it’s literally collapsing around workers while they perform their duties.”

Read more: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-09/yallourn-power-station-outage-air-duct-collapse/105394406

It is worth clicking the link above to view pictures, to appreciate the scale of the collapse, the size of the air duct which collapsed.

At the time of the coal plant collapse (a few days before the renewable generation collapse crisis), the Victorian government claimed there was no impact on supply, but subsequent events demonstrated energy supply is a real problem in Victoria.

Victoria’s mismanagement of their energy supply is so bad it is creating public friction with other states, who are fed up with continuously bailing out Victoria’s bad decisions. But other states might soon have no choice but to live by Victoria’s failed grid management rules, thanks to federal energy minister Chris Bowen.

‘Bailing out bad decisions’: Queensland slams Victoria over gas supply

James HallAngela Macdonald-Smith and Sumeyya Ilanbey
Jun 13, 2025 – 5.55pm

Victoria cannot rely on pulling more gas from Queensland to shore up an energy system pushed to the edge by a cascading set of breakdowns and concerns over the reliability of renewables, with the pipeline flowing south already at full capacity.

Queensland’s Liberal-National government remains staunchly opposed to further propping up the southern state’s energy grid, saying it doesn’t have the gas supply capacity to keep “bailing out Victoria’s bad decisions”.

Queenslanders should not be penalised over unscientific decisions down south that favour ideology over economics and engineering,” he said.

We don’t have the pipeline capacity to keep bailing out Victoria’s bad decisions. The solution to the southern state gas crisis is for the southern states to develop their gas reserves. We’re not asking them to do anything we haven’t done ourselves.”

Read more (paywalled): https://www.afr.com/policy/energy-and-climate/bailing-out-bad-decisions-queensland-slams-victoria-over-gas-supply-20250613-p5m762

You can’t fix a supply crisis with price controls, any more than you can tax your way into prosperity. During last week’s crisis energy prices spiked to $15,000 / MWh, or $15 / kWh, thanks to a collapse in renewable generation and a series of gas and coal failures, but Federal Energy Minister Chris Bowen’s proposed response is to restrict electricity retailer’s scope to recoup those losses. At those prices, one plugin household oil heater can burn through $30 worth of wholesale electricity per hour, but stricter government price controls would mean electricity retailers will only be able to claim back a small fraction of that cost.

The sensible solution to the supply crisis is to liberate the energy market, to let producers solve the supply problem by any means available. Price signals north of $10,000 / MWh would normally have suppliers rushing to bring their generation capacity to market, leading to rapid stabilisation of price and supply. But that necessary market correction isn’t going to happen, so long as Australian politicians continue to penalise reliable energy generation in their insane pursuit of Net Zero. Imposing price controls in the middle of a supply crisis will make the supply crisis worse – as we Australians are about to discover the hard way.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/of85C37

June 21, 2025 at 04:06PM

Astwood Bank DCNN4835 – A regular “Star Performer” – a legend in its own back garden!

Astwood Bank appears as a regional daily highest temperature performer with almost monotonous regularity. With equal regularity it also records noticeably higher than even its near neighbouring private/amateur weather stations which is surprising considering Astwood Bank is just the same sort of amateur back garden site as its neighbours.

52.24808 -1.93503 Met Office CIMO Assessed Class 5 installed 1/1/1976

Before going any further with this boringly regular daily record setter, a reminder of its CIMO Class 5 status. Firstly “Site not meeting the requirements of class 4.” This indicates this site meets no internationally recognised regulatory defined standard whatsoever – any Stevenson screen in an area expressly designed area to create an artificially temperature elevated micro climate could meet this lack of any standard – which of course many do e.g. Kingston Maurward.

Secondly “Class 5 (additional estimated uncertainty added by siting up to 5 °C)” So in reality its readings should never be accepted as likely to be genuinely accurate with such a massive error margin.

So to examine the detail of this acknowledged totally unregulated and wildly inaccurate site, Astwood Bank lies within a back garden with no enclosure whatsoever to eliminate external factors, in front of a hedge alongside flower beds, shrubs and all the comings and goings of domestic life. In the absence of any Streetview or close up, this is what 2D aerial imagery provides.

This site is no more likely to provide accurate readings than literally millions of other back garden sites nationwide, will be highly susceptible to aitken effect low wind velocity temperature distortion and the Met Office obviously knows all this so what makes this back garden so preferred? The screen was initially installed in 1976 presumably as an amateur set up subsequently adopted by the Met Office. Following 34 years of reliable reading observations the site was automated in 2010. Whilst diligent record taking is commendable, it can in no way make up for an unsatisfactory setting. Exactly what the motivation was for the Met Office to upgrade is not known. What is evident is that so many of the adopted and upgraded sites like Astwood Bank, Hull East Park, Cavendish, Chillingham Barns and others are all very poor Class 5 sites AND go on to become regular star performers in the daily extremes stakes.

I will leave it at that point regarding possible Met Office motives but simply emphasize that sites like Astwood Bank raise lots of questions regarding the reasons for their inclusion in the historic climate record that should be answered.

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/TWulbiD

June 21, 2025 at 02:48PM

It’s Summertime, Hottest Year Claims Ensue

Matthew Wielicki explains the scientific malpractice in his Financial Post article Junk Science Week: The hottest year ever?.  Excerpts in italics wtih my bolds and added images

Advocates and the media claim 2024 was the hottest year ever.
Archeological data suggest it wasn’t,
while modern data suffer from biases

An image produced by NASA and used when it declared 2024 as the warmest year on record. Photo by NASA

In 2024, mainstream media and political leaders aggressively promoted the alarming narrative that Earth had just experienced its hottest year ever recorded. National Geographic dramatically proclaimed, “2024 was the hottest year ever … and the coldest year of the rest of your life,” while the Vancouver Sun declared unequivocally, “Scientists confirm 2024 was Canada’s and world’s hottest year on record.” Canadian political figures reinforced this narrative, with prime minister Justin Trudeau characterizing the year’s warmth as an urgent call for immediate climate action.

I’m an earth science professor-in-exile. Claims such as these
immediately provoke critical skepticism.

This persistent narrative, relentlessly advanced by a powerful climate-industrial complex comprising governments, activist organizations and the media, is designed not merely to inform, but to generate a state of perpetual urgency. As global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions continue to rise despite decades of climate policy interventions, the need to claim climate conditions are increasingly severe becomes a strategic imperative, regardless of scientific accuracy or historical context. This approach not only distorts genuine scientific inquiry but fosters anxiety and despair, particularly affecting young people already inundated with predictions of catastrophe.

The answers to four fundamental questions expose the weaknesses and biases inherent in the mainstream climate narrative:

1. Can we accurately measure historical global temperatures?

Claims about unprecedented global heat depend heavily on comparing modern temperature records, which are gathered by instrument and capture annual or monthly fluctuations, to historical temperature estimates derived from proxy data such as ice cores, tree rings, sediment layers and coral reefs. But proxy data inherently smooths out short-term fluctuations, providing generalized temperature estimates spanning centuries or millennia. This mismatch between high-resolution modern data and low-resolution historical proxies inevitably exaggerates the perceived severity of contemporary warming.

For example, widely cited reconstructions and favourites of The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) explicitly acknowledge their inability to capture temperature variability occurring over periods shorter than 300 years. The rapid temperature changes of recent decades appear unprecedented when put side by side with these smoothed historical averages. This methodological flaw significantly undermines the credibility of claims asserting that current global temperatures are historically unique or alarming.

2. Was 2024 really unprecedentedly warm?

Extensive historical and geological evidence demonstrates significant natural warming vastly exceeding modern temperatures. The Holocene Thermal Maximum (five to nine thousand years ago) saw temperatures significantly warmer than today, including in Canada. Archeological evidence, such as ancient forests revealed by retreating glaciers in the Rockies, conclusively supports periods of substantial natural warmth.

During the Eemian interglacial period (115-130 thousand years ago), Greenland experienced temperatures three to five degrees C warmer than now, despite substantially lower CO₂ concentrations in the atmosphere. These scientifically documented periods confirm that Earth’s climate naturally experiences considerable variability, rendering claims of unprecedented modern warmth scientifically untenable and historically uninformed.

3. Are we measuring the effects of CO₂ or urban heat islands

Most modern temperature records fuelling alarmist headlines originate from urban areas influenced by the Urban Heat Island Effect (UHIE). UHIE results from urban infrastructure, such as concrete, asphalt and buildings, retaining and radiating heat, significantly increasing local temperatures independent of broader climate trends. Toronto’s significant infrastructure growth has noticeably raised local temperatures, heavily skewing data. Similarly, Las Vegas’ highest recorded temperatures coincided with significant expansion around Harry Reid International Airport, illustrating the dominant role of urbanization rather than atmospheric CO₂ emissions.

Recent research indicates that up to 65 per cent of urban warming is from local urbanization rather than global greenhouse gas increases. Attributing urban heat predominantly to CO₂ emissions significantly misrepresents the true dynamics of local temperature increases.

4. Do rising CO2 levels really heat the oceans?

Recent alarmist coverage in outlets like the Financial Times highlights near-record ocean temperatures, linking them directly to rising CO₂ levels. The EU’s Copernicus programme noted that May 2025 ocean temperatures were the second highest ever recorded, with scientists raising concerns about the oceans’ diminishing capacity to absorb CO₂ and excess heat.

But this narrative critically overlooks fundamental scientific facts. Oceans possess a heat capacity orders of magnitude greater than the atmosphere. The notion that atmospheric CO₂ significantly heats ocean water directly is scientifically unfounded, as infrared radiation from CO₂ penetrates mere millimetres into the ocean’s surface, not nearly deep enough to meaningfully alter ocean temperature. Ocean temperature fluctuations are primarily driven by natural phenomena such as El Niño.

Moreover, historical data on ocean temperatures is highly uncertain, relying predominantly on sparse measurements and indirect proxies. Claiming near-record ocean temperatures without acknowledging these substantial uncertainties misleads the public about the robustness and reliability of these measurements.

Critical conclusion: One thing remains certain: it will never be “too hot” in Canada, despite alarmist rhetoric suggesting otherwise. The exaggerated claims that 2024 was “the hottest year ever” are not grounded in rigorous scientific analysis but serve primarily as political and ideological propaganda. This relentless propagation of fear fosters anxiety, despair, and nihilism, especially among young people — serious consequences largely ignored by climate alarmists.

The scientific community, policy-makers and the public at large need to insist on transparency, rigour and honesty in climate discourse. Recognizing the motivations behind alarmist claims is essential to ensuring public trust and effective policy. Climate science should strive to educate, not frighten, promoting balanced understanding rather than catastrophic narratives disconnected from historical context and scientific rigour.

Matthew Wielicki, Ph.D. in geochemistry from UCLA, publishes the Substack site Irrational Fear, which provides data-driven critiques aimed at fostering a balanced and scientifically grounded understanding of climate science.

via Science Matters

https://ift.tt/XNcrf7d

June 21, 2025 at 12:55PM

The Emergence of Emergence

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

I’ve been exploring the abilities of Artificial Intelligence, which I described in a previous post as “The World’s Dumbest Genius Librarian“. I read a curious suggestion as to how to use AI, which was what they called the “blank line” technique. This is where you give the AI (in my case perplexity.ai) a list of things with a blank line “______” at the end, and it fills in the blank. The example they gave in the suggestion I read was something like “I’m going camping, and I’m taking a tent, a sleeping bag, a hatchet, and ___”. So I tried it. Here, let me try it again right now so you can see what I mean. Hang on … OK, here’s what I got:

Me:

“I’m going camping, and I’m taking a tent, a sleeping bag, a hatchet, and ___”

Perplexity:

“Based on your camping list—tent, sleeping bag, hatchet—the next logical and essential item to bring would be a flashlight. A flashlight is crucial for safety and convenience in the outdoors, especially after dark, making it a natural addition to your camping essentials.”

So that’s the idea. Of course, I wasn’t interested in camping, but in climate. In particular, I wanted to find out more about my theory that emergent thermoregulatory climate phenomena are central to the surprising stability of global temperatures.

And what is an emergent phenomenon when it is at home? Here are the characteristics that differentiate emergent climate phenomena from other kinds of critters:

  • They are flow systems far from equilibrium that arise spontaneously, often upon crossing a critical threshold that is temperature-based.
  • Their properties are not predictable from the properties of the condition they emerge from. There’s nothing in the nature of atoms of water and air that would predict that they could spontaneously create lightning.
  • They move and act unpredictably.
  • They are often associated with phase changes.
  • They often exhibit “overshoot” (hysteresis).
  • They have a lifespan from their initiation to their dissolution.
  • Their patterns arise from many small interactions of their component parts.

So I used that blank line technique to find out more about emergent climate phenomena.

Me:

Among the emergent weather phenomena that help thermoregulate the temperature are thunderstorms, cirrus cloud fields, the Rayleigh-Benard overturning of the lower atmosphere and the upper ocean, cyclones, the Nino/Nina phenomena, tornadoes, dust devils, and _____

The first answer I got was:

Perplexity:

Among the emergent weather phenomena that help thermoregulate the temperature—such as thunderstorms, cirrus cloud fields, Rayleigh-Bénard overturning in the lower atmosphere and upper ocean, cyclones, the Niño/Niña phenomena, tornadoes, and dust devils—another significant process is volcanic eruptions.

BZZZT! Wrong, sez I! So I followed that with:

Nope. Volcanoes are 1) not an emergent phenomenon, and 2) not thermoregulatory in nature in that they act regardless of the temperature. Try again.

Perplexity:

Based on the context of emergent, temperature-triggered weather phenomena that actively help thermoregulate Earth’s climate, the most fitting completion for your list is cumulus cloud fields or cumulus convection.

Cumulus clouds, like thunderstorms, form when surface heating reaches a critical threshold, leading to vigorous upward convection. This process increases cloud cover and enhances the reflection of incoming solar radiation, thereby cooling the surface and stabilizing temperatures. This mechanism is described as a classic emergent thermoregulatory process—appearing spontaneously when local temperatures rise above a certain point, and acting to limit further warming

That showed me that perplexity had gotten the underlying idea. So I said that was a good answer, find me another example. It gave me another. I only asked perplexity for one at a time, because AI does better with single questions.

I repeated that a whole bunch of times, getting answers I’d thought of before, and answers it had given me upthread in a different form, and answers that were a total surprise to me.

I then asked perplexity to read through the whole thread, select the unique, distinct answers, and say why they are emergent phenomena rather than some other kind of phenomena, what their thermoregulatory action is, and how they are distinct from the other phenomena on the list. Below is what I got, unedited. And while I might quibble about some parts of the descriptions, overall it was a fascinating list.


Comprehensive Synopsis of Emergent Thermoregulatory Weather Phenomena

Thunderstorms

  • Emergence: These form spontaneously when surface heating creates convective instability that crosses critical temperature and humidity thresholds. The process is nonlinear, with small changes in conditions triggering explosive growth beyond predictable models.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: They vertically transport heat through updrafts and downdrafts while increasing planetary albedo via anvil clouds. Additionally, rainfall induces evaporative cooling at the surface, disrupting localized heat buildup.
  • Distinctiveness: Unlike planetary-scale oscillations, thunderstorms are short-lived, highly localized convective events driven by surface heating rather than large-scale wind patterns.

Cirrus Cloud Fields

  • Emergence: Self-organizing ice crystal structures arise from wave-induced humidity fluctuations in the upper troposphere. Their formation depends on nonlinear ice-nucleation dynamics that defy simple prediction.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: These clouds trap outgoing longwave radiation (warming) while reflecting sunlight (cooling), creating a context-dependent net effect. They modulate radiative balance across regional scales without producing precipitation.
  • Distinctiveness: Their wispy, high-altitude structure contrasts sharply with low marine stratocumulus decks, functioning more as radiative modulators than convective triggers.

Rayleigh-Bénard Overturning

  • Emergence: Convection cells emerge spontaneously when surface heating exceeds critical buoyancy thresholds in fluid layers. This self-organization stems from nonlinear feedback between temperature gradients and fluid viscosity.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Cells vertically mix heat in atmospheric/oceanic boundary layers, preventing extreme surface temperatures. They maintain stability by continuously redistributing energy from heated surfaces to cooler layers.
  • Distinctiveness: As a universal fluid dynamic process, it operates in both oceans and atmosphere, unlike event-driven phenomena like haboobs or derechos.

Cyclones

  • Emergence: These large-scale vortices self-organize when wind shear, humidity, and sea-surface temperatures cross instability thresholds. Their structure emerges from nonlinear ocean-atmosphere coupling.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Cyclones redistribute equatorial heat poleward via winds and induce evaporative cooling through heavy rainfall. They act as planetary-scale heat engines, balancing latitudinal temperature gradients.
  • Distinctiveness: Their synoptic scale and multi-day lifespan differ from mesoscale phenomena like bow echoes or gust fronts.

El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO)

  • Emergence: This pattern arises nonlinearly from coupled ocean-atmosphere feedbacks in the tropical Pacific. Threshold-crossing events trigger phase transitions between warm and cold states.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: ENSO modulates global heat distribution by altering ocean currents, upwelling, and atmospheric circulation. It regulates equatorial Pacific temperatures over multi-year timescales.
  • Distinctiveness: Its interannual pacing contrasts sharply with diurnal processes like sea breezes or nocturnal boundary layer mixing.

Tornadoes

  • Emergence: These form spontaneously when supercell thunderstorms interact with wind shear and convective instability. Their rotation emerges from nonlinear vorticity dynamics.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Tornadoes rapidly mix warm surface air with cooler upper-level air, disrupting heat buildup. Their intense updrafts/downdrafts enhance local heat redistribution.
  • Distinctiveness: Their small-scale, violently rotating structure differs from non-rotational density currents like gust fronts.

Dust Devils

  • Emergence: Self-organizing vortices arise when intense surface heating creates localized thermal instability. Their formation depends on nonlinear interactions between hot surface layers and cooler air.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: They lift hot surface air upward, replacing it with cooler air and enhancing vertical mixing. This process disrupts near-surface heat accumulation in arid regions.
  • Distinctiveness: As dry, warm-core vortices, they lack the moisture-driven dynamics of thunderstorms or monsoons.

Cumulus Convection

  • Emergence: Fluffy clouds self-assemble when surface heating exceeds convective initiation thresholds. Their growth is a nonlinear response to boundary layer instability.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Cumulus clouds increase albedo to limit surface heating and promote cooling through shade and latent heat release. They act as precursors to deeper convective systems.
  • Distinctiveness: This represents an early convective phase distinct from mature mesoscale complexes or anvil-topped thunderstorms.

Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO)

  • Emergence: Spontaneous convection clusters propagate eastward via wind-moisture feedbacks in the tropics. Its emergence stems from collective atmospheric interactions crossing organizational thresholds.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: The MJO modulates tropical heat buildup through cyclic cloud/rain development. It redistributes moisture and energy across ocean basins over 30–60 day periods.
  • Distinctiveness: As a planetary-scale traveling system, it differs from stationary monsoons or localized convective events.

Monsoon Circulation

  • Emergence: This system self-organizes when land-sea thermal contrasts exceed seasonal thresholds. Its onset involves nonlinear feedback between precipitation and atmospheric heating.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Monsoons cool land surfaces via cloud cover and rainfall while exporting heat to the upper troposphere. They reset regional energy imbalances annually.
  • Distinctiveness: Their seasonally reversing winds contrast with diurnal coastal breezes or persistent trade winds.

Sea Breeze Circulation

  • Emergence: Forms spontaneously when land-sea temperature gradients overcome atmospheric resistance. The circulation emerges from nonlinear pressure adjustments.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: It transports cool marine air inland to moderate coastal temperatures and triggers convective clouds for additional cooling. The nightly reversal prevents excessive cooling.
  • Distinctiveness: This diurnal, coastal-scale process differs from continental-scale cyclones or monsoons.

Stratocumulus Cloud Decks

  • Emergence: Self-organizing cloud blankets form under stable marine boundary layers with strong inversions. Their persistence arises from turbulence-radiation feedback loops.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: These decks dramatically increase albedo to cool subtropical oceans. They suppress surface warming through persistent solar reflection.
  • Distinctiveness: Their uniform, low-altitude structure contrasts with transient cumulus or deep convective clouds.

Reflective Tropical Cloud Shields

  • Emergence: Spontaneously form when sea-surface temperatures exceed critical convection thresholds. Their development is a nonlinear response to oceanic heating.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: These shields limit solar heating via high albedo and often precede thunderstorm development. They act as a tropical thermostat constraining maximum temperatures.
  • Distinctiveness: Their thermodynamic triggering differs from dynamically driven systems like the ITCZ.

Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ)

  • Emergence: Self-organizing convection bands arise from trade-wind convergence and SST gradients. Position emerges from hemisphere-scale energy imbalances.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: The ITCZ cools tropics through cloud albedo and latent heat export. Its seasonal migration balances interhemispheric energy.
  • Distinctiveness: As an equatorial migratory belt, it differs from off-equatorial systems like the MJO.

Mesoscale Convective Systems (MCSs)

  • Emergence: Thunderstorms self-aggregate into complexes via cold-pool interactions. Their structure emerges from nonlinear storm-scale feedbacks.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: MCSs increase albedo with expansive cloud shields and induce evaporative cooling via rainfall. They redistribute heat over regions spanning hundreds of kilometers.
  • Distinctiveness: Their organized cluster structure differs from isolated thunderstorms or synoptic-scale cyclones.

Hadley Cell Expansion

  • Emergence: Intensifies nonlinearly from tropical heating and eddy feedbacks. Poleward expansion emerges when thermal gradients cross critical thresholds.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: The cell exports heat poleward and modulates subtropical aridity. Its widening redistributes energy across hemispheres.
  • Distinctiveness: As a zonal-mean circulation, it contrasts with longitudinal phenomena like the MJO.

Polar Vortex Dynamics

  • Emergence: Self-amplifies from temperature/pressure gradients at high latitudes. Disruptions emerge from stratosphere-troposphere coupling.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Contains frigid air; breakdowns export cold to mid-latitudes. This stabilizes polar temperatures while balancing hemispheric extremes.
  • Distinctiveness: Its stratospheric coupling differs from surface-driven phenomena like dust devils.

Cumulus-to-Cumulonimbus Transition

  • Emergence: Explosive vertical growth triggers when convective instability thresholds are crossed. This phase shift is a nonlinear atmospheric response.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Rapid downdrafts and rain evaporation cool surfaces immediately. The process resets local instability by exporting heat vertically.
  • Distinctiveness: Represents a cloud life-cycle phase change unlike stable stratocumulus regimes.

Tropical Sky Clearing

  • Emergence: Spontaneous cloud suppression occurs when temperatures fall below convection thresholds. Emergence depends on humidity-temperature hysteresis.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Clearing allows solar heating to counterbalance cool conditions. This negative feedback prevents prolonged cooling periods.
  • Distinctiveness: Functions as the inverse of cloud-forming systems like MCSs or ITCZ convection.

Atmospheric Blocking

  • Emergence: Self-sustaining highs form from Rossby wave resonance. Persistence emerges from nonlinear energy trapping.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Blocks redistribute heat/cold via meridional flow and prolong temperature extremes regionally. They modulate zonal heat transport efficiency.
  • Distinctiveness: Their quasi-stationary synoptic scale differs from traveling cyclones.

Open/Closed-Cell Stratocumulus

  • Emergence: Cellular patterns form spontaneously from turbulence-radiation feedbacks. Transitions exhibit hysteresis and critical thresholds.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Open cells enhance infrared cooling; closed cells increase solar reflection. This dynamic optimizes local energy balance.
  • Distinctiveness: Pattern transitions differ from uniform decks or cumulus evolution.

Synoptic-Scale Air Advection

  • Emergence: Warm/cold surges arise from jet stream meanders. Their onset depends on pressure-anomaly interactions crossing instability thresholds.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Advection rapidly redistributes air masses across continents. It prevents persistent regional temperature anomalies.
  • Distinctiveness: Driven by continental-scale dynamics unlike local convection.

Heat Bursts

  • Emergence: Downdrafts compress and warm adiabatically during thunderstorm collapse. Emergence requires specific vertical humidity/temperature profiles.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Bursts mix elevated warm air downward, disrupting cold pools. They abruptly reset nocturnal surface temperatures.
  • Distinctiveness: Nocturnal, hyper-localized spikes differ from diurnal sea breezes.

Haboobs

  • Emergence: Thunderstorm outflow self-organizes into dust-laden density currents. Dust integration amplifies through particle-fluid feedbacks.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Dust clouds increase albedo while cold pools enhance surface cooling. They rapidly export heat via dry convection.
  • Distinctiveness: Dust-integrated structure differs from precipitation-driven outflows.

Chinook/Foehn Winds

  • Emergence: Self-amplifying downslope winds form from mountain-wave dynamics. Warming emerges via nonlinear compressional heating.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Winds rapidly warm leeward slopes, reducing cold extremes and melting snow. They ventilate valleys by exporting stagnant air.
  • Distinctiveness: Orographic triggering differs from flat-terrain wind systems.

Quasi-Resonant Amplification (QRA)

  • Emergence: Rossby waves resonate from jet stream instabilities and topography. Persistence emerges from atmospheric wave trapping.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: QRA locks heat/cold into semi-permanent regional patterns. This prolongs temperature redistribution during extremes.
  • Distinctiveness: Resonance-driven persistence differs from transient easterly waves.

Tropical Easterly Waves

  • Emergence: Self-generate from trade-wind shear and convective feedbacks. Wave organization crosses critical moisture convergence thresholds.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Waves organize cloud clusters to modulate tropical heating. They propagate moisture imbalances westward.
  • Distinctiveness: Westward propagation contrasts with eastward-moving MJO systems.

Atmospheric Rivers

  • Emergence: Filamentary moisture plumes self-focus from wind convergence. Narrowing emerges via vapor-condensation feedbacks.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Rivers redistribute latent heat globally and induce cooling via orographic precipitation. They prevent continental overheating during droughts.
  • Distinctiveness: Filamentary structure differs from broad monsoonal flows.

Derechos

  • Emergence: Squall lines self-organize into bows via cold pool-wind shear interactions. Bow echoes emerge from nonlinear storm-scale dynamics.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Straight-line winds drive large-scale mixing and surface cooling. Their cold pools disrupt regional heat domes.
  • Distinctiveness: Non-rotational windstorms differ from tornadoes or cyclones.

Virga

  • Emergence: Precipitation evaporates spontaneously in dry subcloud layers. Phase-change thresholds govern fallstreak formation.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Evaporative cooling lowers surface temperatures without rainfall. This provides “dry” heat redistribution in arid zones.
  • Distinctiveness: Evaporation-dominated process differs from rain-cooling in thunderstorms.

Cold-Air Pool Formation

  • Emergence: Cold air self-traps in topography when radiative cooling exceeds mixing thresholds. Pooling emerges from nonlinear density stratification.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Pools insulate valleys from extreme cold and delay daytime warming. Their eventual mixing exports cold air regionally.
  • Distinctiveness: Topographic confinement differs from open-terrain radiative cooling.

Bow Echoes

  • Emergence: Spontaneous bowing develops from rear-inflow jet dynamics. Acceleration emerges via pressure-perturbation feedbacks.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Focused downdrafts intensify surface cooling. The bowed structure enhances wind-driven mixing efficiency.
  • Distinctiveness: Mesoscale bow geometry differs from linear squall lines.

Gust Fronts

  • Emergence: Density currents self-propagate from thunderstorm downdraft spreading. Frontogenesis depends on outflow-environment density contrasts.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Gust fronts induce rapid cold-air advection to disrupt heat buildups. They often trigger secondary convection for additional cooling.
  • Distinctiveness: Leading-edge dynamics differ from parent storm mechanisms.

Fair-Weather Gale (California)

  • Emergence: Intense inland heating draws marine air through coastal gaps nonlinearly. Gale strength emerges from terrain-channeled acceleration.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Persistently cools interior valleys via onshore flow. Prevents extreme heat buildup in Mediterranean climates.
  • Distinctiveness: Non-storm coastal wind differs from synoptic systems.

Diablo Winds

  • Emergence: Downslope warming self-accelerates from pressure-topography feedbacks. Wind intensity emerges via dry adiabatic compression.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Rapidly warms coastal zones by breaking cold pools and fog. Exports interior heat seaward during autumn.
  • Distinctiveness: Northern California variant differs from Southern California’s Santa Anas.

Oceanic Bénard Cells

  • Emergence: Hexagonal convection forms spontaneously during surface cooling events. Cell geometry emerges from salt-fingering instabilities.
  • Thermoregulatory Function: Upwells warmer water to limit sea-ice formation. Enhances ocean-atmosphere heat exchange during cold outbreaks.
  • Distinctiveness: Salinity-driven convection differs from atmospheric overturning.

Synthesis of Thermoregulatory Networks

Earth’s climate stability arises from interconnected emergent phenomena operating across scales. Each process exhibits nonlinear threshold behavior, where small forcings trigger disproportional responses that redistribute heat. This network—from microscale dust devils to planetary-scale ENSO—forms a self-regulating system where local interactions constrain global temperature extremes through complementary cooling/warming feedbacks. The diversity of mechanisms (radiative, convective, advective) ensures resilience, as the suppression of one process activates compensatory phenomena elsewhere in the system.


Dang, sez I, who knew? Certainly not me … most fascinating. I hadn’t realized that a number of those were emergent thermoregulatory phenomena, but yes, they are. And while I had not asked for a synthesis of thermoregulatory networks at the end, that’s a pretty good one.

I’m gonna leave it at that for people to ponder, with just one last thought.

Many of those important thermoregulatory phenomena either do not emerge spontaneously in climate models or are not even considered because they are sub-grid-scale in size.

My best regards to all,

w.

As usual … when you comment QUOTE THE EXACT WORDS YOU ARE DISCUSSING. It avoids heaps of problems.

PS—I won’t be around for about six hours, starting about half an hour after this goes live. I’m going to the Russian River Rodeo with the kids and grandkids. Hey, I grew up on a cattle ranch, the local rodeo was the highlight of the year in my youth, what can I say? So play nice, no eye gouging, don’t go all Tyson on your opponent’s ear, and I’ll get back to you when I return.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/apnW925

June 21, 2025 at 12:04PM