Winter sea ice ‘supercharges’ Southern Ocean’s CO2 uptake, say researchers – but lack of data is an issue


The researchers seem to start with the premise that everything climate can be related to CO2 levels and those alone, which skews any normal logic. At least they do admit that shortage of data is a problem in trying to understand factors causing natural variation in the ocean carbon cycle in this region. But whether their focus on CO2 is going to be productive in climate terms is open to question, given such an approach usually leads to overestimates of future warming.
– – –
Summary:
A breakthrough study has uncovered that the Southern Ocean’s power to pull carbon dioxide from the atmosphere fluctuates dramatically depending on winter sea ice, says Science Daily.

When sea ice lingers longer into winter, the ocean absorbs up to 20% more CO2, thanks to a protective effect that blocks turbulent winds from stirring up deeper, carbon-loaded waters.

This subtle seasonal shield plays a vital role in buffering our planet against climate change [Talkshop comment – alarmist waffle]. But here’s the twist: winter data from the Southern Ocean is notoriously scarce due to its brutal conditions, meaning we might be missing a key piece of Earth’s climate puzzle, says the University of East Anglia. [Talkshop comment – or we might not be].
= = =
New research reveals the importance of winter sea ice in the year-to-year variability of the amount of atmospheric CO2 absorbed by a region of the Southern Ocean.

In years when sea ice lasts longer in winter, the ocean will overall absorb 20% more CO2 from the atmosphere than in years when sea ice forms late or disappears early. This is because sea ice protects the ocean from strong winter winds that drive mixing between the surface of the ocean and its deeper, carbon-rich layers.

The findings, based on data collected in a coastal system along the west Antarctic Peninsula, show that what happens in winter is crucial in explaining this variability in CO2 uptake.

The study was led by scientists at the University of East Anglia (UEA), in collaboration with colleagues from the Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI, Germany), British Antarctic Survey (BAS, UK) and Institute of Marine Research (IMR, Norway). It is published today in the journal Communications Earth & Environment.

The global ocean takes up about a quarter of all CO2 that humans emit into the atmosphere. The Southern Ocean is responsible for about 40% of this and the researchers wanted to know why it varies so much from year to year.

Source here.
– – –
Image: Antarctic sea ice [credit: BBC]

via Tallbloke’s Talkshop

https://ift.tt/693cZ4a

June 21, 2025 at 08:11AM

Oil Companies Sued Over Death of Woman during 2021 Pacific Northwest Heat Wave

From Legal Insurrection

A review of the marketing of “heat domes”, the history of American heat waves, and the real statistics behind temperature-related deaths.

Posted by Leslie Eastman 

The daughter of a woman who died of “overheating” has filed a groundbreaking wrongful death lawsuit against seven major oil and gas companies in Washington State, alleging that their actions led to her mother’s death during a historic heatwave in June 2021.

The lawsuit, considered the first of its kind in the United States, specifically targets ExxonMobil, BP, Chevron, Shell, ConocoPhillips, Phillips 66, and Olympic Pipeline Company.

The New York Times reviews the case, and of course, its coverage makes the fossil fuel companies look like polluting villains.

Numerous independent investigations, including recent inquiries by Congress, have revealed that many major oil companies and their trade groups spread disinformation about climate change and worked to hold back the clean energy industry.

And scientists around the world overwhelmingly agree that fossil fuel emissions have caused significant planetary warming in recent decades.

Average global temperatures in 2024 were more than 1.5 degrees Celsius, or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, higher than those the planet experienced at the start of the industrial age, leading to extreme heat, violent weather, rising seas and melting glaciers.

While the death of anyone during a heat event is sad, I think there is a lot to unpack here for a more complete understanding of the press and its destructive “climate crisis” coverage.

On June 28, 2021, Seattle experienced unprecedented temperatures, reaching as high as 108°F, which marked the city’s hottest day on record. Juliana Leon, a 65-year-old woman, was driving home from a medical appointment when she was overcome by the extreme heat. Her vehicle’s air conditioning was not working, and she had rolled down the windows, but the intense outdoor conditions proved fatal. A passerby found her unconscious in her car, and emergency responders were unable to revive her. Her official cause of death was hyperthermia, or overheating.

Misti Leon’s lawsuit argues that the oil companies named as defendants knew for decades that their products would contribute to climate change and lead to deadly weather events, yet they concealed and downplayed these risks from the public.

It’s worthwhile to point out that globally, Earth’s temperature averages are among the coldest that have been determined for the last 485 million years.

Much of the press coverage is focused on the “historic heat dome”, which is a weather phenomenon in which a persistent area of high atmospheric pressure traps hot air over a large region for an extended period, sometimes days or even weeks. This high-pressure system acts like a lid or cap, preventing the hot air from rising and escaping, which intensifies the heat at the surface.

The press is ginning up more fear about future “heat domes“.

During this historic heat wave, more than 250 people in the Pacific Northwest succumbed to the heat. In Western Canada, more than 400 people perished. Excessive heat is the No. 1 weather-related hazard-yielding fatality in the world. In fact, it kills more people than all other weather-related hazards — including hurricanes, floods, tornados and winter storms — combined.

However, it turns out that moderate cold is even more deadly to humans than excessive heat.

Globally, cold deaths are 9 times higher than heat-related ones. In no region is this ratio less than 3, and in many, it’s over 10 times higher. Cold is more deadly than heat, even in the hottest parts of the world.

Referring to the term “heat dome”, an AI search of the term reveals that “heat dome” first came into heavy use in 2011, according to a New York Times investigation into its growing popularity, which corresponds to the promotion of “global warming”.

The phrase had been used occasionally before then: one analysis found the term appeared 66 times in media between 1980 and 2000, yet its frequency increased dramatically to 700 mentions between 2010 and 2019, and it has remained widely used since. The American Meteorological Society officially added “heat dome” to its glossary in March 2022.

Yes, because marketing and language are important when you have snake oil to sell.

In the old days, long days of high temperatures used to be called “heat wave”, and the most severe heat wave in U.S. history occurred during the Dust Bowl era in the summer of 1936. Temperatures soared above 100°F (38°C) for prolonged periods, with some areas in North Dakota reaching 120°F (49°C) and Illinois seeing temperatures over 110°F.

Fossil fuel usage was not the factor here. Poor land management practices, which are also a contributing factor to the supposed ‘climate’ problems we face today, have played a role.

Several companies named in the lawsuit did not respond to requests for comments from the “impartial media.” A Chevron spokesperson did go on the record with a pitch-perfect remark.

Chevron Corporation counsel Theodore Boutrous Jr. said in a statement: “Exploiting a personal tragedy to promote politicized climate tort litigation is contrary to law, science, and common sense. The court should add this far-fetched claim to the growing list of meritless climate lawsuits that state and federal courts have already dismissed.”

While it is said that a woman died, 100% of all people will eventually do so. The woman also chose to drive on an extremely hot day without air conditioning and to continue to do so despite discomfort (not choosing to pull over into shade). That’s not the fault of the American petroleum industry.

I will conclude that the fossil fuels the energy companies can’t extract, transport, and sell today may make both summers and winters more expensive and potentially lethal tomorrow.

Image by perplexity.ai.


Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

via Watts Up With That?

https://ift.tt/Ujl6cnz

June 21, 2025 at 08:02AM

Solihull Battery Would Have Stopped Spanish Blackouts!!!

By Paul Homewood

 

While I was googling the Spanish blackouts, I came across this little story:

 

 image

The creation of a battery energy storage system to help prevent blackouts similar to the one suffered in Spain recently has been given the go-ahead by Solihull planners.

Applicant Conrad Energy (Developments) II Limited submitted the plan to develop land at Burton Green Farm, near Solihull, last September.

The systems – to store electricity to be used during fluctuations or in the event of a blackout – was earmarked for agricultural fields surrounded by mature field boundaries and woodland.

“With new renewables coming online it is essential we have the storage in order to have energy available when the wind isn’t blowing or the sun isn’t shining ,” he said.

“We have seen that recent example in Spain (in April) where they had an over reliance on solar which caused a meltdown of their system.”

Full story here.

The idea that this tiny 100 MW storage plant would have avoided Spain’s blackouts is absurd. For a start, batteries cannot supply system inertia. Once the blackouts took hold, no amount of battery storage would have made any difference at all.

Furthermore Burton Green will be of no use at all when the wind stops blowing for two weeks.

This attempt to build an industrial scale storage site in the countryside is just a money grabbing attempt to play the system – whether buying power when it is cheap and selling when it is high, or just getting paid millions in subsidies for grid balancing.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/O5uh9dX

June 21, 2025 at 05:40AM

Spain’s Govt Blames Everything But The Real Culprit For Blackouts

By Paul Homewood

 

 image

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62d8k8edgxo

So that’s alright then! Nothing to worry about.

Nothing to do with the Spanish government’s obsession with renewable energy! Just blame it all on bureaucrats and capitalism.

Except, of course, it was solar power which was at front and centre of the blackouts, a fact which even the whitewash report could not disguise.

The catalyst for the blackout was a sudden loss of 2.2GW of electricity at Granada substation in southern Spain. The report does not appear to address why this happened, which you might have thought was crucial! But it is believed that one or two solar farms stopped transmitting because of negative prices – these resulted from too much solar generation for too little demand, and this is exactly how the market is supposed to work; negative prices lead to less generation, thus bringing the system into balance.

However solar power now makes up such a large part of Spain’s electricity (about 60% at the time of the blackouts), that the very system of negative pricing is a threat in itself to the grid.

As soon as that 2.2GW disappeared, voltages in the local grid plummeted, leading to a complicated chain reaction of grid disconnections. Within 30 seconds the entire Iberian peninsula was experiencing a complete blackout.

The Government whitewash tried to put the blame on the grid operator Red Eléctrica not making sure enough gas power was on the system at the time, which might have provided enough inertia to provide the crucial seconds needed to stabilise the system.

The report, by the way. was presented by Sara Aagesen, Spain’s minister of “ecological transition and demographic challenge” – I suggest that in future, the Spanish Government makes sure its energy system is run by an energy expert, rather than a climate activist. According to Grok:

Aagesen graduated from the Complutense University of Madrid with a degree in chemical engineering, specializing in environmental affairs. Since 2002, she has worked extensively in climate action and energy transition, starting at the Spanish Office for Climate Change (OECC)

But it is Spanish government policy to minimise and eventually get rid of gas power. It was only two weeks before the blackouts that they were bragging that Spain’s grid ran entirely on renewable energy for the first time ( a claim, by the way, which was fake!).

You can hardly overload your grid with intermittent renewables and then complain that there was not enough gas power to deal with those problems of intermittency. Neither can you mandate those renewables and then blame the grid operator for failing to deal with the problems created.

Despite the BBC’s distortions, the facts are very, very simple. If Spain had been running their grid with considerably more gas power and considerably less solar power, those blackouts categorically would not have occurred.

What is noticeable is that since the blackout, Spain has kept much more gas power running. Just before the blackouts, only 2GW of gas power was being produced, 7% of the total load.

In the last day or two, gas power has not dropped below 5GW.

Coincidence? I think not!

image

image

https://www.energymonitor.ai/power/live-eu-electricity-generation-map/

Engineering & Technology have a much more factual review of the report than the BBC’s propaganda here.

via NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE KNOW THAT

https://ift.tt/hZYdEaW

June 21, 2025 at 05:21AM